Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding the role of facial asymmetry in human face identification

  • Published:
Statistics and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Face recognition has important applications in forensics (criminal identification) and security (biometric authentication). The problem of face recognition has been extensively studied in the computer vision community, from a variety of perspectives. A relatively new development is the use of facial asymmetry in face recognition, and we present here the results of a statistical investigation of this biometric. We first show how facial asymmetry information can be used to perform three different face recognition tasks—human identification (in the presence of expression variations), classification of faces by expression, and classification of individuals according to sex. Initially, we use a simple classification method, and conduct a feature analysis which shows the particular facial regions that play the dominant role in achieving these three entirely different classification goals. We then pursue human identification under expression changes in greater depth, since this is the most important task from a practical point of view. Two different ways of improving the performance of the simple classifier are then discussed: (i) feature combinations and (ii) the use of resampling techniques (bagging and random subspaces). With these modifications, we succeed in obtaining near perfect classification results on a database of 55 individuals, a statistically significant improvement over the initial results as seen by hypothesis tests of proportions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson T.W. 1984. An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis, 2nd Edn. Wiley, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Belhumeur P.N., Hespanha J.P., and Kriegman D. 1997. Eigenfaces vs. fisherfaces: Recognition using class specific linear projection. IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 19(7): 711–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L. 1996. Bagging predictors. Machine Learning 24(2): 123–140.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Burke P.H. and Healy M.J. 1993. A serial study of normal facial asymmetry in monozygotic twins. Annals of Human Biology 20(6): 527–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freund Y. and Schapire R. 1997. A decision-theoretic generalization of online learning and an application to boosting. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 55(1): 119–139.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hager J. and Ekman P. 1985. The asymmetry of facial actions is inconsistent with models of hemispheric specialization. Psychophysiology 22: 307–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho T.K. 1998. The random subspace method for constructing decision trees. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 20(8): 832–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanade T., Cohn J.F., and Tian Y.L. 1999. Comprehensive database for facial expression analysis. In: 4th IEEE International Conference on Automatic and Gesture Recognition. Grenoble, Fr.

  • Lim J.S. 1990. Two-Dimensional Signal and Image Processing. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y. and Palmer J. 2003. A quantified study of facial asymmetry in 3d faces. In: Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Workshop on Analysis and Modeling of Faces and Gestures.

  • Liu Y., Schmidt K., Cohn J., and Mitra S. 2003. Facial asymmetry quantification for expression-invariant human identification. Computer Vision and Image Understanding Journal 91(1/2): 138–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y., Schmidt K., Cohn J., and Weaver R.L. 2002. Human facial asymmetry for expression-invariant facial identification. In: Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG'02).

  • O'Toole. 1998. The perception of face gender: the role of stimulus structure in recognition and classification. Memory and Cognition 26(1): 146–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skurichina M. and Duin R.P.W. 1998. Bagging for linear classifiers. Pattern Recognition 31(7): 909–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skurichina M. and Duin R.P.W. 2000. Boosting in linear discriminant analysis. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 1857. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skurichina M. and Duin R.P.W. 2001. Bagging and the random subspace method for redundant feature spaces. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 2096. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R. and Gangstad S.W. (1999) Facial attractiveness. Transactions in Cognitive Sciences 3(12): 452–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troje N.F. and Buelthoff H.H. 1998. How is bilateral symmetry of human faces used for recognition of novel views? Vision Research 38(1): 79–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viola P. and Jones M. 2001. Robust real-time object detection. In: International Conference of Computer Vision.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sinjini Mitra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mitra, S., Lazar, N.A. & Liu, Y. Understanding the role of facial asymmetry in human face identification. Stat Comput 17, 57–70 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-006-9004-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-006-9004-9

Keywords

Navigation