Skip to main content
Log in

Bayesian inference for Gaussian excursion set generated Cox processes with set-marking

  • Published:
Statistics and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work considers spatial Cox point processes where the random intensity is defined by a random closed set such that different point intensities appear in the two phases formed by the random set and its complement. The point pattern is observed as a set of point coordinates in a bounded region W⊂ℝd together with the information on the phase of the location of each point. This phase information, called set-marking, is not a representative sample from the random set, and hence it cannot be directly used for deducing properties of the random set. Excursion sets of continuous-parameter Gaussian random fields are applied as a flexible model for the random set. Fully Bayesian method and Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation is adopted for inferring the parameters of the model and estimating the random set. The performance of the new approach is studied by means of simulation experiments. Further, two forestry data sets on point patterns of saplings are analysed. The saplings grow in a clear-cut forest area where, before planting and natural seeding, the soil has been mounded forming a blotched soil structure. The tree densities tend to be different in the tilled patches and in the area outside the patches. The coordinates of each sapling have been measured and it is known whether this location is in a patch or outside. This example has been a motivation for the study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, R.J.: The Geometry of Random Fields. Wiley, New York (1981)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, S., Carlin, B.P., Gelfand, A.E.: Hierarchical Modelling and Analysis for Spatial Data. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, P.G., Møller, J.: Bayesian analysis of deformed tessellation models. Adv. Appl. Probab. 35, 4–26 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chilès, J.-P., Delfiner, P.: Geostatistics: Modeling Spatial Uncertainty. Wiley, New York (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cressie, N.A.C.: Statistics for Spatial Data. Wiley, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Daley, D.J., Vere-Jones, D.: An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes. Vol. I: Elementary Theory and Methods, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • De Oliveira, V.: Bayesian prediction of clipped Gaussian random fields. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 34, 299–314 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Diggle, P.J., Tawn, J.A., Moyeed, R.A.: Model-based geostatistics (with discussion). Appl. Stat. 47, 299–350 (1998)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, L.P., Stoyan, D.: Modelling marked point patterns by intensity-marked Cox processes. Stat. Probab. Lett. 78, 1194–1199 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Illian, J., Penttinen, A., Stoyan, H., Stoyan, D.: Statistical Analysis and Modelling of Spatial Point Patterns. Wiley, Chichester (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lantuéjoul, C.: Geostatistical Simulation: Models and Algorithms. Springer, Berlin (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Magnussen, S., Allard, D., Wulder, M.: Poisson Voronoï tiling for finding clusters in spatial point patterns. Scand. J. For. Res. 21, 239–248 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mase, S.: The threshold method for estimating total rainfall. Ann. Inst. Stat. Math. 48, 201–213 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Møller, J., Waagepetersen, R.P.: Statistical Inference and Simulation for Spatial Point Processes. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Penttinen, A., Niemi, A.: On statistical inference for the random set generated Cox process with set-marking. Biom. J. 49, 197–213 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Revuz, D., Yor, M.: Continuous Martingales and Brownian Motion. Springer, Berlin (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rue, H., Held, L.: Gaussian Markov Random Fields: Theory and Applications. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2005)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schlather, M.: Simulation and analysis of random fields. R-News 1(2), 18–20 (2001)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Schlather, M., Ribeiro, P.J., Diggle, P.J.: Detecting dependence between marks and locations of marked point processes. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 66, 79–93 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M.: Interpolation of Spatial Data: Some Theory for Kriging. Springer, New York (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stoyan, D.: Interrupted point processes. Biom. J. 21, 607–610 (1979)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Stoyan, D., Kendall, W.S., Mecke, J.: Stochastic Geometry and its Applications. Wiley, Chichester (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mari Myllymäki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Myllymäki, M., Penttinen, A. Bayesian inference for Gaussian excursion set generated Cox processes with set-marking. Stat Comput 20, 305–315 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-009-9123-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-009-9123-1

Keywords

Navigation