Skip to main content
Log in

Book Review: Jonathan Ginzburg, The Interactive Stance: Meaning in Conversation

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Asher, N., and A. Lascarides, Logics of Conversation. Cambridge University Press, 2003.

  2. Brown, P., and S. Levinson, Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics, 1978.

  3. Clear, J.H., The digital word. Chapter The British National Corpus. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1993, pp. 163–187.

  4. Fernández, R., J. Ginzburg, and S. Lappin, Classifying non-sentential utterances in dialogue: A machine learning approach. Computational Linguistics 33(3), 2007.

  5. Frampton, M., R. Fernández, P. Ehlen, M. Christoudias, T. Darrell, and S. Peters, Who is “you”?: Combining linguistic and gaze features to resolve secondperson references in dialogue. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, EACL ’09, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2009, pp. 273–281. Association for Computational Linguistics.

  6. Gabsdil, M., Clarification in spoken dialogue systems. In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Natural Language Generation in Spoken and Written Dialogue, Palo Alto, California, 2003, pp. 28–35.

  7. Ginzburg, J., The interactive Stance: Meaning for Conversation. Oxford University Press, 2012.

  8. Grice, P., Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, volume 3. Academic Press, New York, 1975, pp. 41–58.

  9. Keysar, B., D. J. Barr, and W. S. Horton, The egocentric basis of language use: Insights from a processing approach. Current directions in psychological science, 1998, pp. 46–50.

  10. Larsson, S., and D. R. Traum, Information state and dialogue management in the trindi dialogue move engine toolkit. Natural Language Engineering 6(3-4):323–340, September 2000.

  11. Liang, P., and C. Potts, Bringing machine learning and compositional semantics together. Annual Reviews of Linguistics (to appear), 0, 2014.

  12. Martin-Löf, Intuitionistic type theory. Mathematics, 1984.

  13. Pollard, C., and I. Sag, Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. University of Chicago Press, 1994.

  14. Purver, M., The Theory and Use of Clarification Requests in Dialogue. PhD thesis, King’s College, University of London, 2004. Supervised by Jonathan Ginzburg.

  15. Rieser, V., and J. Moore, Implications for generating clarification requests in taskoriented dialogues. In Proceedings of the Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL ’05, Stroudsburg, UPA, USA, 2005, pp. 239–246.

  16. Rodríguez, K., and D. Schlangen, Form, intonation and function of clarification requests in german task oriented spoken dialogues. In Proceedings of the Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue, SEMDIAL, 2004, pp. 101–108.

  17. E. Schegloff: Some sources of misunderstanding in talk-in-interaction. Linguistics 8, 201–218 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Skantze, G., Error Handling in Spoken Dialogue Systems. PhD thesis, KTH - Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden, 2007. Supervised by Rolf Carlson.

  19. Traum, D., A Computational Theory of Grounding in Natural Language Conversation. PhD thesis, Computer Science Dept., U. Rochester, USA, 1994. Supervised by James Allen.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luciana Benotti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Benotti, L. Book Review: Jonathan Ginzburg, The Interactive Stance: Meaning in Conversation. Stud Logica 103, 877–882 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-015-9624-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-015-9624-1

Navigation