Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Book Reviews

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Burgess J.P.: Which modal logic is the right one?. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40(1), 81–93 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fine, K., and S. Kuhn, Modal Logic, manuscript (1983-2016).

  3. Kuhn, S., Modal logic. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, London, 1998.

  4. Kuhn S.T.: Logical expressions, constants, and operator logic. The Journal of Philosophy 78(9), 487–499 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lemmon, E. J., and G. P. Henderson. Symposium: Is There Only One Correct System of Modal Logic?. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 33: 23–56, 1959.

  6. Lewis, D. K., Counterpart theory and quantified modal logic. The Journal of Philosophy (1968): 113–126.

  7. Linsky B., Zalta E.N.: In defense of the simplest quantified modal logic. Philosophical perspectives 8, 431–458 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, 20057, USA

    Steven T. Kuhn

Authors
  1. Steven T. Kuhn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven T. Kuhn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuhn, S.T. Book Reviews. Stud Logica 105, 217–226 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-017-9708-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-017-9708-1

Search

Navigation