Skip to main content
Log in

A strategy of multi-criteria decision-making task ranking in social-networks

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we formulate an interesting problem of multicriteria decision-making task ranking in social networks (MCDM-TR). MCDM-TR contains two phases: (1) finding a set of decision-making experts for tasks who not only complete the decision-making of the given task but also have the minimal communication cost among them; (2) ranking the decision-made tasks according to a certain decision standard. In this paper, we focus on these two phases and propose an efficient algorithm for multicriteria decision-making tasks in social networks. A case study of academic conferences quality evaluation system (ACQES) is also studied to illustrate our strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Algorithm 1
Algorithm 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. www.arnetminer.org.

  2. http://arnetminer.org/lab-datasets/expertfinding/.

References

  1. Umm-e-Habiba, Sohail A (2009) A survery on multi-criteria decision making approaches. In: Proceedings of international conference on emerging technologies, pp 321–325

    Google Scholar 

  2. Liu D, Stewart TJ (2003) Integrated object-oriented framework for MCDM and DSS modelling. Decis Support Syst, 38:421–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Putrus P (1990) Accounting for intangibles in integrated manufacturing (nonfinancial justification based on the analytical hierarchy process). Inf Strategy, 6:25–30

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boucher TO, McStravic EL (1991) Multi-attribute evaluation within a present value framework and its relation to the analytic hierarchy process. In: The engineering economist, vol 37, pp 55–71

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lappas T, Liu K, Terzi E (2009) Finding a team of experts in social networks. In: Proceedings KDD

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kargar M, An A (2011) Discovering top-k teams of experts with/without a leader in social networks. In: Proceedings CIKM, pp 985–994

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kempe D, Kleinberg JM, Tardos E (2003) Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In: Proceedings SIGKDD, pp 137–146

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chen W, Wang Y, Yang S (2009) Efficient influence maximization in social networks. In: Proceedings SIGKDD, pp 199–208

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hao F, Chen M, Zhu C, Guizani M (2012) Discovering influential users in micro-blog marketing with influence maximization mechanism. In: Proceedings GLOBECOM, pp 488–492

    Google Scholar 

  10. Li C, Sha M (2010) Team formation for generalized tasks in expertise social networks. In: Proceedings SocialCom, pp 9–16

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wi H, Oh S, Mun J, Jung M (2009) A team formation model based on knowledge and collaboration. Expert Syst Appl 36(5):9121–9134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Strnad D, Guid N (2010) A fuzzy-genetic decision support system for project team formation. In: Applied soft computing, pp 14–20

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chen SJ, Lin L (2006) Modeling team member characteristics for the formation of a multifunctional team in concurrent engineering. In: Symposium on collaborative technologies and systems, pp 306–311

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gaston M, Simmons J, Desjardins M (2004) Adapting network structures for efficient team formation. In: Proceedings of the AAAI fall symposium on artificial multi-agent learning

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cheatham M, Cleereman K (2006) Application of social network analysis to collaborative team formation. In: Proceedings of international symposium on collaborative technologies and systems, pp 306–311

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Anagnostopoulos A, Becchetti L, Castillo C, Gionis A, Leonardi S (2010) Power in unity: forming teams in large-scale community systems. In: Proceedings of CIKM

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lai YJ, Hwang CL (1994) Fuzzy multiple objective decision making methods and applications. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Fendel G, Spronk J (1983) Multiple criteria decision methods and applications. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Li D (2005) Multiattribute decision making models and methods using intuitionistic fuzzy sets. J Comput Syst Sci 7:73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shih HS, Shyur HJ, Lee ES (2005) An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making. Math Comput Model 45:801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yoon KP, Wang Y, Hwang CL (1995) Multiple attribute decision making: an introduction. Sage University Papers, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  22. Triantaphyllou E (2000) Multi-criteria decision making: a comparative study. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Triantaphyllou E, Shu B, Nieto Sanchez S, Ray T (1998) Multi-criteria decision making: an operations research approach. In: Encyclopedia of electrical and electronics engineering, pp 175–196

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiyuan Shi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shi, Z., Hao, F. A strategy of multi-criteria decision-making task ranking in social-networks. J Supercomput 66, 556–571 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-013-0934-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-013-0934-7

Keywords

Navigation