Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effectiveness evaluation of Internet of Things-aided firefighting by simulation

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the emerging Internet of Things technology, the world is facing rapid changes in all areas; firefighting is no exception. Conventional firefighting is a dangerous occupation which involves saving lives and property from fires. The skills of firefighting have not changed greatly over the years; hence, using the IoT to aid firefighters is a way to improve their performance. Due to the lack of research on implementing the IoT in the firefighting domain, the objective of this study was to use the quantitative method to gain insights into the usefulness of using the IoT as an aid to firefighting. A Monte Carlo simulation was developed for processing the detailed firefighting interactions in situations of uncertainty. After the verification of the simulation model, the results showed that the search time ratios of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) to conventional firefighting for various levels of severity of fire were 30.09, 26.69, and 22.24%. The search and rescue time ratios of UAV to conventional firefighting were 48.27, 35.95, and 31.87%. The most important of these statistics is that at least 50% of the time spent by firefighters on the scene of the fire can be reduced by using the Internet of Things. All of the above data were analyzed usingt test, which showed significant improvement when the Internet of Things was implemented in firefighting. The contribution of this study is to present quantitative results for proving the value of integrating the Internet of Things into firefighting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hall JR (2014) The total cost of fire in the United States. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fahy RF, LeBlanc PR, Molis JL (2016) Firefighter Fatalities in the United States-2015. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy

    Google Scholar 

  3. Varone C (2012) Firefighter safety and radio communication. Fire Manag Today 156(3):14

    Google Scholar 

  4. Thiel A, Stambaugh H (2013) Improving firefighter communications, U.S. Fire Administration Technical Report 099. 1999. http://www.usfa.fema.gov

  5. Parker R, Bayne K, Clifford V (2014) Minimum fitness recommendations for rural fire personnel. New Zealand Fire Service Commission, Wellington

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bearman C, Owen C, Brooks B, Grunwald J (2013) Problems of maintaining elective teamwork during out of scale In: Proceedings of the Bushfire CRC and AFAC 2013 Conference Research Forum

  7. Li N, Yang Z, Ghahramani A, Becerik-Gerber B, Soibelman L (2014) Situational awareness for supporting building fire emergency response: information needs, information sources, and implementation requirements. Fire Saf J 63:17–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Weinschenk CG, Overholt KJ, Madrzykowski D (2014) Simulation of an attic fire in a wood frame residential structure—Chicago, IL. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Alberto DS, Bernabe C, Mart’ınez-de DJR, Baturone AO (2012) A WSN-based tool for urban and industrial fire-fighting. Sensors 12:15009–15035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schultz C, Bhatt M (2011) Toward accessing spatial structure from building information models. In: UDMS 2011: 28th Urban data management symposium, Delft, The Netherlands, Urban Data Management Society; OTB Research Institute for the Built Environment; Delft University of Technology, 28–30 Sep 2011

  11. Silvernail J (2016) Applying the principles of modern fire attack to the objectives of the fire service. 6 12 2014. http://modernfirebehavior.com/applying-the-principles-of-modern-fire-attack-to-the-objectives-of-the-fire-service/. Accessed 29 July 2016

  12. McCormack R (2016) Engine company operations: DICERS-VO for extinguishment. 30 7 2014. http://www.fireengineering.com/articles/2014/07/dicers-vo-protecting-the-egress.html. Accessed 29 July 2016

  13. Angulo R, Clark BA, Auch S (2012) Rules of engagement for structural firefighting—increasing firefighter survival. International Association of Fire Chiefs, Fairfax

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grant C, Hamins A, Bryner N, Jones A, Koepke G (2015) Research roadmap for smart fire fighting. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy

    Google Scholar 

  15. Averill JD, Peacock RD, Keeney RL (2009) Rethinking egress: a vision for the future. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pilemalm S (2011) Emergency response systems: concepts, features, evaluation and design. Center for Advanced Research in Emergency Response, Linköping

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hamins A, Averill JD, Gann RG, Bryner NP, Davis RD, Butry DT, Maranghides A, Yang JC, Madrzykowski D, Bundy MF, Manzello SL, Gilman JW, Amon FK, Mell WE (2012) Strategic roadmap for fire risk reduction in buildings and communities. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg

    Google Scholar 

  18. Roman J, Rodwell S (November/December 2014) Data Driven. NFPA J 40–50

  19. Hamins A, Bryner N, Jones A, Koepke G, Grant C, Raghunathan A (2014) Smart firefighting workshop summary report. NIST Special Publication, Arlington

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wani AR, Shabir S, Naaz R (2013) Augmented reality for fire & emergency services. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Recent Trends in Communication and Computer Networks, Hyderabad, India

  21. Aden ST, Bialas JP, Champion Z, Levin E, McCarty JL (2014) Low cost infrared and near-infrared sensors for UAVs. In: Proceedings of the ISPRS technical commission I symposium on international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, vol XL-1. Denver, CO, USA, pp 1–7, 17–20 Nov 2014

  22. Monares Á, Ochoa SF, Santos R, Orozco J, Meseguer R (2014) Modeling IoT-based solutions using human-centric wireless sensor networks. Sensors 14:15687–15713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Stanton NA, Plant KL, Roberts AP, Harvey C, Thomas TG (2015) Extending helicopter operations to meet future integrated transportation needs. Appl Ergon 47:364–373

  24. Bachrach A, He R, Prentice S, Roy N (2011) RANGE—Robust autonomous navigation in GPS-denied environments. J Field Robot 28(5):644–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Grzonka S, Grisetti G, Burgard W (2012) A fully autonomous indoor quadrotor. IEEE Trans Robot 99:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shen S, Michael N, Kumar V (2011) Autonomous multi-floor indoor navigation with a computationally constrained MAV. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Shanghai, China

  27. Bendig J, Bolten A, Bareth G (2012) Introducing a low-cost mini-UAV For thermal- and multispectral-imaging In: International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, vol XXXIX (B1). Melbourne, Australia, pp 345–349

  28. von Heimburg E, Ingulf Medbø J (2013) Energy cost of the Trondheim firefighter test for experienced firefighters. Int J Occup Saf Ergon (JOSE) 19(2):211–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Farmer CM (2015) Visualization of auditory masking for firefighter alarm detection. The University of Texas, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  30. Penders J et al (2011) A robot swarm assisting a human fire-fighter. Adv Robot 25(1):93–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Organization I.M. (2005) IAMSAR manual. International Maritime Organization, London

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Management, Shih Chien University, Kaohsiung, 84550, Taiwan

    Kuei Min Wang

  2. Department of Innovative Information and Technology, Tamkang University, Yilan County, 26247, Taiwan

    Lin Hui

Authors
  1. Kuei Min Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lin Hui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kuei Min Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, K.M., Hui, L. Effectiveness evaluation of Internet of Things-aided firefighting by simulation. J Supercomput 76, 1383–1397 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-017-2098-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-017-2098-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation