Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A cluster prediction model-based data collection for energy efficient wireless sensor network

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wireless sensor networks (WSN) are expected to cover the major portion of the earth’s surface in the coming years. In the era of IoT, the WSN is the major data collection framework. To manage with the energy efficient data collection paradigm in WSN, numerous techniques have been suggested by the research community. In this paper, a data-aware energy conservation technique is proposed. Here, the inherent correlation between the consecutive observations of the sensor node and the data trend similarity between the neighboring sensor nodes are utilized to reduce the data transmission. A prediction-based data collection framework reduces the temporal data redundancy. ARIMA modeling is used to predict the data. The model is constructed by the (Clusterhead) CH node and is communicated to the cluster nodes. On every data collection round, the nodes compare the model predicted data and the observed data of the instant. If there is a deviation beyond the specified threshold, the nodes communicate the data difference to the CH. The data differences collected by the CH are compressed by using PCA technique. The compressed data are then sent to the sink node. Using this method, a huge portion of redundant data transmission is cut off. The method also maintains the collected data’s accuracy within the predefined error threshold. Being a data reduction-based energy conservation technique, this results in reduced data collision. This method conserves 82% of energy with the error threshold of minimum level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mao S et al (2014) Joint energy allocation for sensing and transmission in rechargeable wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 63(6):2862–2875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hong YW, Scaglione A (2006) Energy-efficient broadcasting with cooperative transmissions in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 5(10):2844–2855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Elhoseny M et al (2015) Balancing energy consumption in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks using genetic algorithm. IEEE Commun Lett 19(12):2194–2197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheng VW, Wang TY (2010) Performance analysis of distributed decision fusion using a censoring scheme in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 59(6):2845–2851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rago C, Willett PK, Bar-Shalom Y (1996) Censoring sensors: a low-communication-rate scheme for distributed detection. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 32(2):554–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jiang R, Chen B (2005) Fusion of censored decisions in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Wireless Commun 4(6):2668–2673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pai H-T (2000) Equal-gain combination for adaptive distributed classification in wireless sensor networks. Int J Ad Hoc Ubiquitous Comput 4(2):115–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cetin M, Chen L, Fisher JW III, Ihler AT, Moses RL, Wainwright MJ, Willsky AS (2006) Distributed fusion in sensor networks: a graphical models perspective. IEEE Signal Process Mag 23(4):42–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yiu S, Schober R (2009) Nonorthogonal transmission and noncoherent fusion of censored decisions. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 58(1):263–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Krause A, Singh A, Guestrin C (2008) Near-optimal sensor placements in Gaussian processes: theory, efficient algorithms and empirical studies. J Mach Learn Res 9:235–284

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Pukelsheim F (2006) Optimal design of experiments. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Msechu EJ, Giannakis GB (2011). Distributed measurement censoring for estimation with wireless sensor networks. In: IEEE 12th International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications

  13. Appadwedula S, Veeravalli VV, Jones DL (2008) Decentralized detection with censoring sensors. IEEE Trans Signal Process 56:1362–1373

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Rago C, Willett P, Bar-Shalom Y (1996) Censoring sensors: a low-communication-rate scheme for distributed detection. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 32:554–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang H et al (2008) Network lifetime maximization with cross-layer design in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 7(10):3759–3768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wei G, Ling Y, Guo B, Xiao B, Vasilakos AV (2011) Prediction-based data aggregation in wireless sensor networks: combining grey model and Kalman Filter. Comput Commun 34(6):793–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang B et al (2013) An energy efficient sampling method through joint linear regression and compressive sensing. In: Intelligent Control and Information Processing (ICICIP), Fourth International Conference on. IEEE

  18. Tharini C, Ranjan PV (2011) An energy efficient spatial correlation based data gathering algorithm for wireless sensor networks. Int J Distrib Parallel Syst 2(3):16–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yoon S, Shahabi C (2007) The clustered aggregation (CAG) technique leveraging spatial and temporal correlations in wireless sensor networks. ACM Trans Sens Netw (TOSN) 3(1):3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Masiero R, Quer G, Munaretto D, Rossi M, Widmer J, Zorzi M (2009, November) Data acquisition through joint compressive sensing and principal component analysis. In: Global Telecommunications Conference, 2009. GLOBECOM 2009. IEEE, pp 1–6

  21. Macua SV, Belanovic P, Zazo S (2010, June) Consensus-based distributed principal component analysis in wireless sensor networks. In: Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC), 2010 IEEE Eleventh International Workshop on. IEEE, pp 1–5

  22. Le Borgne YA, Raybaud S, Bontempi G (2008) Distributed principal component analysis for wireless sensor networks. Sensors 8(8):4821–4850

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Kalasalingam Academy of Research and Education, Srivilliputhur, Tamil Nadu, 626126, India

    S. Diwakaran & B. Perumal

  2. Department of CSE, Velammal College of Engineering, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 620001, India

    K. Vimala Devi

Authors
  1. S. Diwakaran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. Perumal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. Vimala Devi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Diwakaran.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Diwakaran, S., Perumal, B. & Vimala Devi, K. A cluster prediction model-based data collection for energy efficient wireless sensor network. J Supercomput 75, 3302–3316 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-018-2437-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-018-2437-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation