Skip to main content
Log in

OAFPM: optimized ANFIS using frequent pattern mining for activity recognition

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fall causes serious perils for the elder people when they are living alone. A mathematical model, optimized ANFIS using frequent pattern mining (OAFPM) for activity recognition, is proposed in this paper, which uses fuzzy inference system, adaptive neural network and frequent pattern mining (FPM) to identify the activity of a person accurately. Accelerometer values are given as input to the proposed model in real time which forms the premise part of the model, whereas the consequence is defined by the rules generated out of input and output linear relation. Initial rule identification is done through membership functions of each activity, and the number of rules is reduced using FPM approach. During the learning phase, the optimal premise parameters are selected using gradient descent method and the choice of consequent parameters is based on the least-square estimation method. The optimal values of premise and consequent parameters along with the reduced rule matrix made the OAFPM model to achieve an accuracy rate of 95.8\(\%\) and also reduce the computational complexity by triggering less number of nodes for each activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aggarwal JK, Ryoo MS (2011) Human activity analysis: a review. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR) 43(3):16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Hmouz A, Shen J, Al-Hmouz R, Yan J (2012) Modeling and simulation of an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) for mobile learning. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 5(3):226–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bulling A, Blanke U, Schiele B (2014) A tutorial on human activity recognition using body-worn inertial sensors. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR) 46(3):33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chae J, Jin Y, Wen M, Zhang W, Sung Y, Cho K (2018) Genetic algorithm-based adaptive weight decision method for motion estimation framework. J Supercomput 1–13

  5. Cheng BC, Tsai YA, Liao GT, Byeon ES (2010) HMM machine learning and inference for activities of daily living recognition. J Supercomput 54(1):29–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dempe S, Ruziyeva A (2012) On the calculation of a membership function for the solution of a fuzzy linear optimization problem. Fuzzy Sets Syst 188(1):58–67

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Gaglio S, Re GL, Morana M (2015) Human activity recognition process using 3-D posture data. IEEE Trans Hum Mach Syst 45(5):586–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. He Z, Jin L (2009) Activity recognition from acceleration data based on discrete consine transform and SVM. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2009, SMC 2009. IEEE, pp 5041–5044

  9. He ZY, Jin LW (2008) Activity recognition from acceleration data using AR model representation and SVM. In: International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 2008, vol 4. IEEE, pp 2245–2250

  10. Hemalatha CS, Vaidehi V, Lakshmi R (2015) Minimal infrequent pattern based approach for mining outliers in data streams. Expert Syst Appl 42(4):1998–2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hu N, Englebienne G, Lou Z, Kröse B (2017) Learning to recognize human activities using soft labels. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 39(10):1973–1984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Igual R, Medrano C, Plaza I (2015) A comparison of public datasets for acceleration-based fall detection. Med Eng Phys 37(9):870–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jang JS (1993) ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 23(3):665–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jang JS (1996) Input selection for ANFIS learning. In: Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, 1996, vol 2. IEEE, pp 1493–1499

  15. Kang J, Kim J, Lee S, Sohn M (2018) Transition activity recognition using fuzzy logic and overlapped sliding window-based convolutional neural networks. J Supercomput 1–18

  16. Khan AM, Lee YK, Lee SY, Kim TS (2010) A triaxial accelerometer-based physical-activity recognition via augmented-signal features and a hierarchical recognizer. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 14(5):1166–1172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li C, Lin M, Yang LT, Ding C (2014) Integrating the enriched feature with machine learning algorithms for human movement and fall detection. J Supercomput 67(3):854–865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li F, Shirahama K, Nisar MA, Köping L, Grzegorzek M (2018) Comparison of feature learning methods for human activity recognition using wearable sensors. Sensors 18(2):679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Poorani VD, Ganapathy K, Vaidehi V (2012) Sensor based decision making inference system for remote health monitoring. In: International Conference on Recent Trends in Information Technology (ICRTIT), 2012. IEEE, pp 337–342

  20. Ramasamy Ramamurthy S, Roy N (2018) Recent trends in machine learning for human activity recognition—A survey. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov 8(4):e1254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Takagi T, Sugeno M (1985) Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 1:116–132

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Turaga P, Chellappa R, Subrahmanian VS, Udrea O (2008) Machine recognition of human activities: a survey. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 18(11):1473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Twomey N, Diethe T, Fafoutis X, Elsts A, McConville R, Flach P, Craddock I (2018) A comprehensive study of activity recognition using accelerometers. In: Informatics, vol 5, issue 2. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, p 27

  24. Van Kasteren T, Englebienne G, Kröse BJ (2010) Activity recognition using semi-Markov models on real world smart home datasets. J Ambient Intell Smart Env 2(3):311–325

    Google Scholar 

  25. Vrigkas M, Nikou C, Kakadiaris IA (2015) A review of human activity recognition methods. Front Robot AI 2:28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ye W, Xiang-yu B (2013) Research of fall detection and alarm applications for the elderly. In: Proceedings 2013 International Conference on Mechatronic Sciences, Electric Engineering and Computer (MEC). IEEE, pp 615–619

  27. Zendehboudi A, Li X, Wang B (2017) Utilization of ANN and ANFIS models to predict variable speed scroll compressor with vapor injection. Int J Refrig 74:475–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work is funded by NRDMS, Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, New Delhi, and Centre for Research, Anna University. Also, the first author acknowledges her financial support provided by Anna University through visvesvaraya fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Poorani Marimuthu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marimuthu, P., Perumal, V. & Vijayakumar, V. OAFPM: optimized ANFIS using frequent pattern mining for activity recognition. J Supercomput 75, 5347–5366 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-019-02802-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-019-02802-z

Keywords

Navigation