Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Classification of the tree for aerial image using a deep convolution neural network and visual feature clustering

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, over-exploitation has led to the accelerated destruction of rural and natural environments for urban development, making an understanding of land use and land cover changes, one of the most urgently required and important tools for urban land planning. To this end, before any land planning begins, the distribution ratio of trees for a given piece of land is determined by calculating the area of that land covered by trees. This study proposes the use of supervised machine learning methods to classify treed areas and combines unsupervised color clustering techniques to achieve optimum classification results. First, the YOLO (you only look once) classification model is used to obtain tree features and location information. The ‘K-means’ and ‘Flood fill algorithm’ methods were tested with tree classification experiments, measuring precision rate, accuracy rate, and recall rate, with shape, illumination, and angle of tree species, and color differences affecting classification results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. United Nations (Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division) (2015) World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, (ST/ESA/SER.A/366)

  2. Seto KC, Shepherd JM (2009) Global urban land-use trends and climate impacts. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 1(1):89–95

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sanesi G, Gallis C, Kasperidus HD (2011) Urban forests and their ecosystem services in relation to human health. In: Forests, Trees and Human Health, pp 23–40 (2011)

  4. Aber JD (1992) Nitrogen cycling and nitrogen saturation in temperate forest ecosystems. Trends Ecol Evol 7:220–224

    Google Scholar 

  5. Escobedo FJ, Nowak DJ (2009) Spatial heterogeneity and air pollution removal by an urban forest. Landsc Urban Plan 90:102–110

    Google Scholar 

  6. Livesley SJ, McPherson GM, Calfapietra C (2016) The urban forest and ecosystem services: impacts on urban water, heat, and pollution cycles at the tree, street, and city scale. J Environ Qual 45:119–124

    Google Scholar 

  7. Salmond JA, Tadaki M, Vardoulakis S, Arbuthnott K, Coutts A, Demuzere M, Dirks KN, Heaviside C, Lim S, Macintyre H, McInnes RN, Wheeler BW (2016) Health and climate related ecosystem services provided by street trees in the urban environment. Environ Health 15:S36

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nowak DJ (2002) The effects of urban trees on air quality. USDA Forest Service, Syracuse

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nowak DJ, Hirabayashi S, Bodine A, Greenfield E (2014) Tree and forest effects on air quality and human health in the United States. Environ Pollut 193:119–129

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nowak DJ, Crane DE (2002) Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. Environ Pollut 116:381–389

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nowak DJ, Greenfield EJ, Hoehn RE, Lapoint E (2013) Carbon storage and sequestration by trees in urban and community areas of the United States. Environ Pollut 178:229–236

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bolund P, Hunhammar S (1999) Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecol Econ 29:293–301

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao S, Da L, Tang Z, Fang H, Song K, Fang J (2006) Ecological consequences of rapid urban expansion: Shanghai, China. Front Ecol Environ 4(7):341–346

    Google Scholar 

  14. Matteucci S, Morello J (2009) Environmental consequences of exurban expansion in an agricultural area: the case of the Argentinian Pampas ecoregion. Urban Ecosyst 4:323–334

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sluiter J, Frings-Dresen M, Meijman T, Van der Beek A (2000) Reactivity and recovery from different types of work measured by catechol amines and cortisol: a systematic literature overview. Occup Environ Med 57:298–315

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kaplan S (1995) The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework. J Environ Psychol 15(3):169–182

    Google Scholar 

  17. Beyer K, Kaltenbach A, Szabo A et al (2014) Exposure to neighborhood green space and men- tal health: evidence from the survey of the health of Wisconsin. Environ Res Public Health 11:3453–3472

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chang C-Y, Chen P-K (2005) Human response to window views and indoor plants in the workplace. HortScience 40:1354–1359

    Google Scholar 

  19. Elsadek M, Jo H, Sun M, Fujii E (2013) Brain activity and emotional responses of the Japanese people toward trees pruned using Sukashi technique. Int J Agric Environ Biotechnol 6(3):344–350

    Google Scholar 

  20. Elsadek M, Sayaka S, Fujii E, Koriesh E, Moghazy E, El Abd, Fatah Y (2013) Human emotional and psycho-physiological responses to plant color stimuli. J Food Agric Environ 11:1584–1591

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tsunetsugu Y, Lee J, Park B, Tyrväinen L, Kagawa T, Miyazaki Y (2013) Physiological and psychological effects of viewing urban forest landscapes assessed by multiple measurements. Landsc Urban Plan 113:90–93

    Google Scholar 

  22. White M, Alcock I, Wheeler B et al (2013) Would you be happier living in a greener urban area? A fixed-effects analysis of panel data. Psychol Sci 24:920–928

    Google Scholar 

  23. Reklaitiene R, Grazuleviciene R, Dedele A et al (2014) The relationship of green space, depressive symptoms and perceived general health in urban population. Scand J Public Health 42(7):669–676

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hassan A, Tao J, Li G, Jiang M, Aii L, Zhihui J, Zongfang L, Qibing C (2018) Effects of walking in bamboo forest and city environments on brainwave activity in young adults. In: Evidence-Based

  25. Shin W, Yeoun P, Yoo R, Shin C (2010) Forest experience and psychological health benefits: the state of the art future prospect in Korea. Environ Health Prev Med 15:38–47

    Google Scholar 

  26. Elsadek M, Fujii E (2014) People’s psycho-physiological responses to plantscape colors stimuli: a pilot study. Int J Psychol Behav Sci 4(2):70–78

    Google Scholar 

  27. Elsadek M, Sun M, Fujii E (2017) Psycho-physiological responses to plant variegation as measured through eye movement, self-reported emotion and cerebral activity. Indoor Built Environ 26(6):758–770

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hartig T, Evans GW, Jamner LD, Davis D, Gärling T (2003) Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. J Environ Psychol 23(2):109–123

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chiesura A (2004) The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landsc Urban Plan 68(1):29–138

    Google Scholar 

  30. MacKerron G, Mourato S (2013) Happiness is greater in natural environments. Glob Environ Change 23:992–1000

    Google Scholar 

  31. Grahn P, Stigsdotter UK (2010) The relation between perceived sensory dimensions of urban green space and stress restoration. Landsc Urban Plan 94(3):264–275

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ernstson H (2012) The social production of ecosystem services: a framework for studying environmental justice and ecological complexity in urbanized landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 109(1):7–17

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kong F, Yin H, James P, Hutyra L, He H (2014) Effects of spatial pattern of greenspace on urban cooling in a large metropolitan area of eastern China. Landsc Urban Plan 128:35–47

    Google Scholar 

  34. Abreu-Harbich L, Labaki LC, Matzarakis A (2015) Effect of tree planting designed tree species on human thermal comfort in the tropic. Landsc Urban Plan 138:99–109

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hsieh C-M, Jan F-C, Zhang L (2016) A simplified assessment of how tree allocation, wind environment, and shading affect human comfort. Urban For Urban Green 18:126–137

    Google Scholar 

  36. Höjer M, Ahlroth S, Dreborg KH, Ekvall T, Finnveden G, Hjelm O, Hochschorner E, Nilsson M, Palm V (2008) Scenarios in selected tools for environmental systems analysis. J Clean Prod 16:1958–1970

    Google Scholar 

  37. Moss R, Edmonds J, Hibbard K, Manning M, Rose S, van Vuuren D, Carter T, Emori S, Kainuma M, Kram T, Meehl G, Mitchell J, Nakicenovic N, Riahi K, Smith S, Stouffer R, Thomson A, Weyant J, Wilbanks T (2010) The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463:747–756

    Google Scholar 

  38. Brown DG, Walker R, Manson S, Seto K (2004) Modeling land-use and land-cover change. In: Land Change Science, pp 395–409

  39. Weinhaus FM, Devich RN (1999) Photogrammetric texture mapping onto planar polygons. Graph Models Image Process 61(2):63–83

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Ghamisi P, Benediktsson JA (2015) Feature selection based on hybridization of genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 12(2):309–313

    Google Scholar 

  41. MacQueen J (1967) Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, vol 1, no 14, pp 281–297

  42. Achanta R, Shaji A, Smith K, Lucchi A, Fua P, Süsstrunk S (2012) SLIC super pixels compared to state-of-the-art superpixel methods. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 34(11):2274–2282

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ball GH, Hall DJ (1965) ISODATA, a novel method of data analysis and classification. Tech. Rep. Stanford University, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  44. Bezdek JC, Ehrlich R, Full W (1984) FCM: the fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm. Comput Geosci 10(2–3):191–203

    Google Scholar 

  45. Romero A, Gatta C, Camps-Valls G (2016) Unsupervised deep feature extraction for remote sensing image classification. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 54(3):1349–1362

    Google Scholar 

  46. Jackson Q, Landgrebe DA (2002) Adaptive Bayesian contextual classification based on Markov random fields. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 40(11):2454–2463

    Google Scholar 

  47. Bengio Y, Courville A, Vincent P (2013) Representation learning: a review and new perspectives. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 35(8):1798–1828

    Google Scholar 

  48. Redmon J, Farhadi A (2019) Yolov3: an incremental improvement, arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.02767

  49. MacQueen JB (1967) Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 1, pp 281–297

  50. Xia G-S, Hu J, Hu F, Shi B, Bai X, Zhong Y, Zhang L (2017) AID: a benchmark dataset for performance evaluation of aerial scene classification. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 55(7):3965–3981

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (Grant No. MOST 107-2221-E-025-007).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chuen Horng Lin.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, C.H., Yu, C.C., Wang, T.Y. et al. Classification of the tree for aerial image using a deep convolution neural network and visual feature clustering. J Supercomput 76, 2503–2517 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-019-03012-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-019-03012-3

Keywords

Navigation