Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison study of wavelet transforms for the visualization of differentially methylated regions in DNA samples

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

DNA methylation analysis has become an important topic in the study of human health. DNA methylation analysis requires not only a specific treatment of DNA samples based on bisulfite, but also software tools for their analysis. Although many software tools have been developed and some tools for detecting differentially methylated regions (DMRs) in the DNA have been proposed, there is still a lack of tools for interactively displaying the DMRs found. In previous works, we proposed a new approach based on the Haar wavelet transform for the interactive visualization of DMRs at different scales. However, the nature of this wavelet produces signal overlapping which prevents an easy detection of visual differences between case and control signals in some cases. In this paper, we show a comparison study of different wavelet transforms which may solve this problem. The evaluation results show that some of the considered wavelet transforms are very prone to yield negative signal segments due to the signal inertia, which may lead to false DMR detection. However, the spline wavelet transform does not significantly suffer from this effect, clearly highlighting true DMRs. Also, the spline wavelet transform does not need to reconstruct the signal in the lower transformation levels, which improves interactivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. CpG denotes a C-G DNA sequence in the same thread, as opposed to a C-G pair (a C in one thread and a G in the opposite thread). A CpG island is a segment of CGCGCG..., which is known to be a promoting region.

References

  1. Chen A, Ho SM, Leung YK, Xie C, Long DX, Hoyo C (2019) Differential methylation values in differential methylation analysis. Bioinformatics 35(7):1094–1097. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. de Mello V, Pulkkinen L, Lalli M, Kolehmainen M, Pihlajamäki J, Uusitupa M (2014) DNA methylation in obesity and type 2 diabetes. Ann Med 46(3):103–13. https://doi.org/10.3109/07853890.2013.857259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fernández L, Pérez M, Orduña JM (2018) Visualization of DNA methylation results through a GPU-based parallelization of the wavelet transform. J Supercomput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-018-2670-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. González C, Pérez M, Orduña JM (2020) HPG-HMapper: a DNA hydroxymethylation analysis tool. Int J High Perform Comput Appl 34(1):57–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094342019840792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hansen KD, Langmead B, Irizarry RA (2012) BSmooth: from whole genome bisulfite sequencing reads to differentially methylated regions. Genome Biol 13(10):R83. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2012-13-10-r83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Krueger F, Andrews SR (2011) Bismark: a flexible aligner and methylation caller for bisulfite-seq applications. Bioinformatics 27(11):1571–1572. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee W, Morris JS (2016) Identification of differentially methylated loci using wavelet-based functional mixed models. Bioinformatics 32(5):664–672. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mallat S (2001) A wavelet tour of signal processing, 2nd edn. Academic Press Inc, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Olanda R, Pérez M, Orduña JM, Tárraga J, Dopazo J (2017) A new parallel pipeline for DNA methylation analysis of long reads datasets. BMC Bioinform 18(1):161. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1574-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. PyWavelets: Wavelet biorthogonal 3.5 (bior3.5) (2019). http://wavelets.pybytes.com/wavelet/bior3.5/

  11. Raciti A, Nigro C, Longo M, Parrillo L, Miele C, Formisano P, Béguino F (2014) Personalized medicine and type 2 diabetes: lesson from epigenetics. Epigenomics 6(2):229–238. https://doi.org/10.2217/epi.14.10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shafi A, Mitrea C, Nguyen T, Draghici S (2018) A survey of the approaches for identifying differential methylation using bisulfite sequencing data. Brief Bioinform 19(5):737–753. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbx013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shenoy Nea (2019) Ascorbic acid-induced TET activation mitigates adverse hydroxymethylcytosine loss in renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Investig 129(4):1612–1625. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI98747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sun D, Xi Y, Rodriguez B, Park HJ, Tong P, Meong M, Goodell MA, Li W (2014) Moabs: model based analysis of bisulfite sequencing data. Genome Biol 15(2):R38. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2014-15-2-r38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tárraga J, Pérez M, Orduña JM, Duato J, Medina I, Dopazo J (2015) A parallel and sensitive software tool for methylation analysis on multicore platforms. Bioinformatics 31(19):3130. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wu H, Xu T, Feng H, Chen L, Li B, Yao B, Qin Z, Jin P, Conneely KN (2015) Detection of differentially methylated regions from whole-genome bisulfite sequencing data without replicates. Nucleic Acids Res 43(21):e141. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv715

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by Spanish MCIU and EU ERDF programs under Grant RTI2018-098156-B-C55.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan M. Orduña.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fernández, L., Pérez, M. & Orduña, J.M. A comparison study of wavelet transforms for the visualization of differentially methylated regions in DNA samples. J Supercomput 77, 2609–2623 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-020-03269-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-020-03269-z

Keywords

Navigation