Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound combined with magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of deep pelvic endometriosis under deep learning

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article was to explore the application of deep learning algorithms in the classification and diagnosis of deep pelvic endometriosis (DPE) by ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Vaginal ultrasound (VU) and MRI images of 118 patients with DPE and 206 patients with other gynaecological diseases who were treated in our hospital from January 2015 to January 2018 were analysed. Firstly, the global average pooling (GAP) was introduced based on the visual geometry group (VGG) network to design the VGG-GAP model for VU image recognition. Next, the C3D model was improved as the IC3D model for MRI image recognition. The diagnostic values of patients with DPE based on classified VU and MRI images were compared and analysed. The results revealed that the classification accuracy of the VGG-GAP model in the VU image was 96.5%, and the classification accuracy of the IC3D model in the MRI image was 99.2%. The diagnosis accuracy using VU images and MRI images was 90.68% and 92.37%, respectively. Based on this, the classification of VU or MRI images based on deep learning algorithms could provide a basis for improving the diagnosis efficiency of DPE. The value of MRI in the diagnosis of DPE was significantly higher than that of VU.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vimercati A, Achilarre MT, Scardapane A, Lorusso F, Ceci O, Mangiatordi G et al (2015) Accuracy of transvaginal sonography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance-colonography for the presurgical staging of deep infiltrating endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 40(5):592–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sherif MF, Badawy ME, Elkholi DGEY (2015) Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of deeply infiltrating endometriosis. Egyp J Radiol Nucl Med 46(1):159–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Medeiros LR, Rosa MI, Silva BR, Reis ME, Simon CS, Dondossola ER et al (2015) Accuracy of magnetic resonance in deeply infiltrating endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 291(3):611–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Malzoni M, Di GA, Exacoustos C, Lannino G, Capece R, Perone C et al (2016) Feasibility and safety of laparoscopic-assisted bowel segmental resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis: a retrospective cohort study with description of technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23(4):512–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Niu Y, Lu Z, Wen JR, Xiang T, Chang SF (2019) Multi-modal multi-scale deep learning for large-scale image annotation. IEEE Trans Image Process 28(4):1720–1731

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Aggarwal A (2020) Kumar, 2020. M. Image surface texture analysis and classification using deep learning, Multimedia Tools Applications (MTAP)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chaudhari AS, Fang Z, Kogan F, Wood J, Stevens KJ, Gibbons EK et al (2018) Super-resolution musculoskeletal MRI using deep learning. Magn Reson Med 80(5):2139–2154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kumar M, Alshehri M, Alghamdi R, Sharma P, Deep V (2020) A de-ann inspired skin cancer detection approach using fuzzy c-means clustering. Mob Net Appl 25:1319–1329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen XJ, Wang Y, Shen M, Yang B, Zhou Q, Yi Y, Liu W, Zhang G, Yang G, Zhang He (2020) Deep learning for the determination of myometrial invasion depth and automatic lesion identification in endometrial cancer mr imaging: a preliminary study in a single institution. Eur Radiol 30(9):4985–4994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dong HC, Dong HK, Yu MH, Lin YH, Chang CC (2020) Using deep learning with convolutional neural network approach to identify the invasion depth of endometrial cancer in myometrium using mr images: a pilot study. Int J Environ Res Pub Health 17(16):5993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Totev T, Tihomirova T, Tomov S, Gorchev G (2014) Deep infiltrating endometriosis-diagnosis and principles of surgical treatment. Akusherstvo i ginekologiia 53(2):37–41

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hudelist G, Ballard K, English J, Wright J, Banerjee S, Mastoroudes H, Thomas A, Singer CF, Keckstein J (2011) Transvaginal sonography vs clinical examination in the preoperative diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis. Ultrasound obstet Gynecol: Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 37(4):480–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Deslandes A, Parange N, Childs JT, Osborne B, Bezak E (2020) Current Status of Transvaginal Ultrasound Accuracy in the Diagnosis of Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis Before Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Ultrasound Med 39(8):1477–1490

  14. Berger J, Henneman O, Rhemrev J, Smeets M, Jansen FW (2018) MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Imaging for Diagnosis of Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis—A Critical Appraisal. Ultrasound Int Open 4(3):E85–E90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li J, Sun M, Zhang X, Wang Y (2020) Joint decision of anti-spoofing and automatic speaker verification by multi-task learning with contrastive loss. IEEE Access 8:7907–7915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Xu Y, Xu C, Kuang X, Wang H, Chang EI, Huang W, Fan Y (2016) 3D-SIFT-Flow for atlas-based CT liver image segmentation. Med Phys 43(5):2229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tanaka H, Chiu SW, Watanabe T, Kaoku S, Yamaguchi T (2019) Computer-aided diagnosis system for breast ultrasound images using deep learning. Phys Med Biol 64(23):235013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jian J, Xiong F, Xia W, Zhang R, Gu J, Wu X, Meng X, Gao X (2018) Fully convolutional networks (FCNs)-based segmentation method for colorectal tumors on T2-weighted magnetic resonance images. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 41(2):393–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ahammed Muneer KV, Rajendran VR, K PJ (2019) Glioma Tumor Grade Identification Using Artificial Intelligent Techniques. Journal of medical systems, 43(5), 113.

  20. Wang SH, Xie S, Chen X, Guttery DS, Tang C, Sun J, Zhang YD (2019) Alcoholism identification based on an AlexNet transfer learning model. Frontiers Psychiatry 10:205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Grøvik E, Yi D, Iv M, Tong E, Rubin D, Zaharchuk G (2020) Deep learning enables automatic detection and segmentation of brain metastases on multisequence MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging: JMRI 51(1):175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yarmish G, Sala E, Goldman DA, Lakhman Y, Soslow RA, Hricak H et al (2017) Abdominal wall endometriosis: differentiation from other masses using ct features. Abdom Radiol 42(5):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Adema GJ, Hoogenboom M, Bijgaart RVD, Eikelenboom D, Wesseling P, Heerschap A et al (2016) Pathology and immune effects of magnetic resonance imaging-guided boiling histotripsy in murine tumor models. J Acoust Soc Am 140(4):3082–3083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Roman H, Quibel S, Auber M, Muszynski H, Huet E, Marpeau L et al (2015) Recurrences and fertility after endometrioma ablation in women with and without colorectal endometriosis: a prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod 30(3):558–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Teama AH, Alarabawy RA, Mohamed HA, Eissa HH (2015) Role of magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of rectal neoplasms. Egyptian Journal of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, 46(4): 833-846

  26. Zolciaksiwinska A, Kowalczyk A, Sikorska K, Bijok M, Michalski W, Gruszczynska E (2018) Comparison of computed tomography with magnetic resonance imaging for imaging-based clinical target volume contours in cervical cancer brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 17(4):667–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There was no dedicated funding regarding this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minmin Yang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Author Minmin Yang declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Min Liu declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Yan Chen declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Suhui He declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Yan Lin declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, M., Liu, M., Chen, Y. et al. Diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound combined with magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of deep pelvic endometriosis under deep learning. J Supercomput 77, 7598–7619 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-020-03535-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-020-03535-0

Keywords

Navigation