Skip to main content
Log in

Digital forensic analysis of intelligent and smart IoT devices

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

AI is combined with various devices to provide improved performance. IoT devices combined with AI are called smart IoT. Smart IoT devices can be controlled using wearable devices. Wearable devices such as smartwatches and smartbands generate personal information through sensors to provide a range of services to users. As the generated data are preserved in the storage of the wearable device, getting access to these data from the device can prove useful in criminal investigations. We, therefore, propose a forensic model based on direct connections using wireless or interfaces beyond indirect forensics for wearable devices. The forensic model was derived based on the ecosystem of wearable devices and was divided into logical and physical forensic methods. To confirm the applicability of the forensic model, we applied it to wearable devices from Samsung, Apple, and Garmin. Our results demonstrate that the proposed forensic model can be successfully used to derive artifacts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kim S, Jo W, Shon T (2020) APAD: autoencoder-based payload anomaly detection for industrial IoE. Appl Soft Comput 88:106017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kwon S, Yoo H, Shon T (2020) IEEE 1815.1-based power system security with bidirectional RNN-based network anomalous attack detection for cyber-physical system. IEEE Access 8:77572–77586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim H, Kim S, Jo W, Kim KH, Shon T (2021) Unknown payload anomaly detection based on format and field semantics inference in cyber-physical infrastructure systems. IEEE Access 9:75542–75552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jiang F, Fu Y, Gupta BB, Liang Y, Rho S, Lou F, Tian Z (2018) Deep learning based multi-channel intelligent attack detection for data security. IEEE transact Sustai Comput 5(2):204–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rathore MM, Ahmad A, Paul A, Rho S (2016) Urban planning and building smart cities based on the internet of things using big data analytics. Comput Netw 101:63–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Muhammad K, Ahmad J, Mehmood I, Rho S, Baik SW (2018) Convolutional neural networks based fire detection in surveillance videos. IEEE Access 6:18174–18183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Patently, IDC sees growth in wearables through to 2023 with apple watch leading the way, 2019.06. Accessed 29 Jan 2021 https://www.patentlyapple.com/patently-apple/

  8. Lu Y, Li DX (2018) Internet of Things (IoT) cybersecurity research: A review of current research topics. IEEE Internet Things J 6(2):2103–2115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hou J et al (2019) A survey on digital forensics in internet of things. IEEE Internet Things J 7(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Al H, Haifa et al. (2020) State of the art in digital forensics for small scale digital devices. In: 2020 11th International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS). IEEE

  11. Yang SJ et al (2017) Live acquisition of main memory data from android smartphones and smartwatches. Dig Investig 23:50–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Siboni S et al (2016) Advanced security testbed framework for wearable IoT devices. ACM Transact on Internet Technol (TOIT) 16(4):1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rughani PH, Dahiya M (2015) Analysis of android smart watch artifacts. Int J Sci Eng Res 6(8):920–930

    Google Scholar 

  14. Al-Sharrah, Manal, Ayed S, Imtiaz A. (2018) Watch your smartwatch. In: 2018 International Conference on Computing Sciences and Engineering (ICCSE). IEEE

  15. Cyr, Britt, et al. (2014) Security analysis of wearable fitness devices (fitbit). Massachusetts Inst Technol 1

  16. Ibrahim B et al. (2015) Watch what you wear: preliminary forensic analysis of smart watches. In: 2015 10th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security. IEEE

  17. Dorai G, Shiva H, Sudhir A (2020) Data extraction and forensic analysis for smartphone paired wearables and IoT devices. In: Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

  18. Kang S, Soram K, Jongsung K (2020) Forensic analysis for IoT fitness trackers and its application. Peer-to-Peer Netw Appl 13(2):564–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. MacDermott, Á ine, et al. (2019) Forensic analysis of wearable devices: fitbit, garmin and HETP watches. In: 2019 10th IFIP International Conference on New Technologies, Mobility and Security (NTMS). IEEE

  20. Becirovic S, Sasa M (2019) Manual IoT forensics of a samsung gear S3 Frontier smartwatch. In: 2019 International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM). IEEE

  21. Gregorio J, Alarcos B, Gardel A (2019) Forensic analysis of nucleus RTOS on MTK smartwatches. Digital Investig 29:55–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Odom NR et al (2019) Forensic inspection of sensitive user data and artifacts from smartwatch wearable devices. J Forensic Sci 64(6):1673–1686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jo W et al (2019) Digital forensic practices and methodologies for AI speaker ecosystems. Digital Investig 29:S80–S93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shin Y et al (2020) Certificate injection-based encrypted traffic forensics in AI speaker ecosystem. Forensic Sci Int Digital Investig 33:301010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Li S et al (2019) IoT forensics: amazon echo as a use case. IEEE Internet Things J 6(4):6487–6497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee S et al (2019) ExtSFR: scalable file recovery framework based on an Ext file system. Multimed Tools Appl 79:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  27. Counterpoint, Global smartwatch market revenue up 20% in H1 2020, Led by Apple, Garmin & Huawei, 2020.08. Accessed 29 Jan 2021, https://www.counterpointresearch.com/global-smartwatch-market-revenue-h1-2020/

  28. XDA Developers, Accessed 14 Apr 2021 https://forum.xdadevelopers.com/t/galaxy-watch-active-2-44mm-sm-r820-odinstuck.4009587/#post-81471105

  29. Libmobiledevice, Accessed 29 Jan 2021 https://github.com/libimobiledevice

  30. Garmin Developer, Accessed 29 Jan 2021 https://developer.garmin.com/fit/overview/

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (NRF-2018R1D1A1B07043349). This research was supported by Energy Cloud R&D Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT (NRF-2019M3F2A1073385)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taeshik Shon.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not available due to the privacy, so data sharing is not applicable.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 5.

See Table 6.

See Table 7.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, M., Shin, Y., Jo, W. et al. Digital forensic analysis of intelligent and smart IoT devices. J Supercomput 79, 973–997 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-022-04639-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-022-04639-5

Keywords

Navigation