Abstract
This paper builds a dialectical system of explanation with speech act rules that define the kinds of moves allowed, like requesting and offering an explanation. Pre and post-condition rules for the speech acts determine when a particular speech act can be put forward as a move in the dialogue, and what type of move or moves must follow it. A successful explanation has been achieved when there has been a transfer of understanding from the party giving the explanation to the party asking for it. The dialogue has an opening stage, an explanation stage and a closing stage. Whether a transfer of understanding has taken place is tested by a dialectical shift to an examination dialogue.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aristotle: (1928) On sophistical refutations. Loeb classical library. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Atkinson K., Bench-Capon T. J. M., McBurney P. (2006) Computational representation of practical argument. Synthese 152: 157–206
Bench-Capon T. J. M. (2003) Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks. Journal of Logic and Computation 13: 429–448
Bench-Capon T. J. M., Doutre S., Dunne P. E. (2007) Audiences in argumentation frameworks. Artificial Intelligence 171(1): 42–71
Bench-Capon T. J. M., Doutre S., Dunne P. E. (2008) Asking the right question: Forcing commitment in examination dialogues. In: Besnard P., Doutre S., Hunter A. (eds) Computational models of argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 49–60
Bratman M., Israel D., Pollack M. (1988) Plans and resource-bounded practical reasoning. Computational Intelligence 4(3): 349–355
Cawsey A. (1992) Explanation and interaction: The computer generation of explanatory dialogues. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Collingwood R. G. (1946) The idea of history. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Dray W. (1964) Philosophy of history. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Dray W. (1995) History as re-enactment: R. G. Collingwood’s idea of history. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Dunne, P. E., Doutre, S., & Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2005). Discovering inconsistency through examination dialogues. Proceedings IJCAI-05 (pp. 1560–1561). Edinburgh.
Finocchiaro M. (1980) Scientific discoveries as growth of understanding: The case of Newton’s gravitation. In: Nickles T. (eds) Scientific discovery, logic, and rationality. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 235–255
Friedman M. (1974) Explanation and scientific understanding. The Journal of Philosophy LXXI: 5–19
Gordon T. F., Walton D. (2009) Proof burdens and standards. In: Rahwan I., Simari G. (eds) Argumentation and artificial intelligence. Springer, Berlin, pp 239–260
Guthrie W. K. C. (1981) A history of Greek philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kass A., Leake D. (1987) Types of explanations. Technical Report ADA183253. U.S. Department of Commerce, Alexandria, VA
Leake D. B. (1992) Evaluating explanations: A content theory. Erlbaum, Hillsdale
Moore J. D. (1995) Participating in explanatory dialogues. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Moulin B., Irandoust H., Belanger M., Desbordes G. (2002) Explanation and argumentation capabilities. Artificial Intelligence Review 17: 169–222
Parsons S., Jennings N. R. (1997) Negotiation through argumentation: A preliminary report. In: Tokoro M. (eds) Proceedings of the second international conference on multi-agents systems. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, pp 267–274
Pera M. (1994) The discoveries of science. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Prakken H. (2005) Coherence and flexibility in dialogue games for argumentation. Journal of Logic and Computation 15: 1009–1040
Prakken H. (2006) Formal systems for persuasion dialogue. The Knowledge Engineering Review 21: 163–188
Reed C. (2006) Representing dialogic argumentation. Knowledge-Based Systems 19(1): 22–31
Schank R. C. (1986) Explanation patterns: Understanding mechanically and creatively. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
Schank R. C., Abelson R. P. (1977) Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
Schank R. C., Kass A., Riesbeck C. K. (1994) Inside case-based explanation. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
Schank R. C., Riesback C. K. (1981) Inside computer understanding. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
Schlangen, D. (2004). Causes and strategies for requesting clarification in dialogue. In M. Strube & C. Sidner (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th SIGdial workshop on discourse and dialogue (pp. 136–143). East Stoudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics. http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/hlt-naacl2004/sigdial04/pdf/schlangen.pdf.
Scriven M. (1972) The concept of comprehension: From semantics to software. In: Carroll J. B., Freedle R. O. (eds) Language comprehension and the acquisition of knowledge. W. H. Winston & Sons, Washington, pp 31–39
Scriven M. (2002) The limits of explication. Argumentation 16: 47–57
Singh M. P. (1999) A semantics for speech acts. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 8: 47–71
Snoeck Henkemans F. (1992) Analyzing complex argumentation: The reconstruction of multiple and coordinatively compound argumentation in a critical discussion. SICSAT, Amsterdam
Trout J. D. (2002) Scientific explanation and the sense of understanding. Philosophy of Science 69(2): 212–233
Unsworth L. (2001) Evaluating the language of different types of explanations in junior high school texts. International Journal of Science Education 23: 585–609
Verheij B. (2003) Dialectical argumentation with argumentation schemes: an approach to legal logic. Artificial Intelligence and Law 11: 167–195
von Wright G. H. (1971) Explanation and understanding. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY
Wagenaar W. A., van Koppen P. J., Crombag H. F. M. (1993) Anchored narratives: The psychology of criminal evidence. Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hertfordshire
Walton D. (2003) The interrogation as a type of dialogue. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1771–1802
Walton D. (2006) Examination dialogue: An argumentation framework for critically questioning an expert opinion. Journal of Pragmatics 38: 745–777
Walton, D. (2007a). Dialogical models of explanation. Explanation-aware computing: Papers from the 2007 AAAI workshop. Technical Report WS-07-06 (pp. 1–9). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
Walton D. (2007b) Clarification dialogue. Studies in communication sciences 7: 165–197
Walton D., Krabbe E. C. W. (1995) Commitment in dialogue. State University of New York Press, Albany
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Walton, D. A dialogue system specification for explanation. Synthese 182, 349–374 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9745-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9745-z