Abstract
This is a personal, incomplete, and very informal take on the role of logic in general philosophy of science, which is aimed at a broader audience. We defend and advertise the application of logical methods in philosophy of science, starting with the beginnings in the Vienna Circle and ending with some more recent logical developments.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alchourrón C. E., Gärdenfors P., Makinson D. (1985) On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions. Journal of Symbolic Logic 50: 510–530
Carnap R. (1967) The logical structure of the world. Pseudoproblems in philosophy. University of California Press, California
Churchland P. M. (1989) A neurocomputational perspective: The nature of mind and the structure of science. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Demopoulos W., Friedman M. (1985) The concept of structure in Russell’s the analysis of matter. Philosophy of Science 52(4): 621–639
Flach, P. A. (1996). Rationality postulates for induction. In Shoham, Y. (Eds.), Proceedings of theoretical aspects of rationality and knowledge, TARK’96 (pp. 267–281). San Mateo: Morgan Kaufmann.
Gabbay D. M. (1985) Theoretical foundations for non-monotonic reasoning in expert systems. In: Apt K. R. (ed.) Logics and models of concurrent systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 439–458
Glymour C. (1992) Android epistemology: Computation, artificial intelligence, and the philosophy of science. In: Salmon M. H. (ed.) Introduction to the philosophy of science. Hackett, Indianapolis/Cambridge, pp 364–403
Grove A. (1988) Two modellings for theory change. Journal of Philosophical Logic 17: 157–170
Hild M., Spohn W. (2008) The measurement of ranks and the laws of iterated contraction. Artificial Intelligence 172(10): 1195–1218
Kelly, K. T. (1998). The learning power of iterated belief revision. In Gilboa, I. (Eds.), Proceedings of the seventh TARK conference (pp. 111–125). Illinois: Evanston.
Ketland J. (2004) Empirical adequacy and ramsification. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55: 287–300
Kraus S., Lehmann D. J., Magidor M. (1990) Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics. Artificial Intelligence 44(1–2): 167–207
Kuipers T. A. F. (2007) Introduction. Explication in philosophy of science. In: Kuipers T. A. F. (ed.) General philosophy of science—focal issues, handbook of the philosophy of science (Vol. 1). Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp vii–xxiii
Leitgeb H. (2004) Inference on the low level. An investigation into deduction, nonmonotonic reasoning, and the philosophy of cognition. Kluwer Applied Logic Series, Dordrecht
Leitgeb H. (2005) Interpreted dynamical systems and qualitative laws: From inhibition networks to evolutionary systems. Synthese 146: 189–202
Leitgeb, H. (2007). Neural network models of conditionals: An introduction. In Arrazola, X. Larrazabal, J. M. et al. (Eds.), LogKCA-07, proceedings of the first ILCLI international workshop on logic and philosophy of knowledge, communication and action (pp. 191–223). Bilbao: University of the Basque Country Press.
Leitgeb, H. (2007). A probabilistic semantics for counterfactuals (Unpublished draft).
Leitgeb, H. (forthcoming). New life for Carnap’s Aufbau? Synthese. doi:10.1007/s11229-009-9605-x.
Leitgeb H., Ladyman J. (2008) Criteria of identity and structuralist ontology. Philosophia Mathematica 16: 388–396
Leitgeb H., Segerberg K. (2007) Dynamic doxastic logic: Why, how, and where to?. Synthese 155(2): 167–190
Lewis D. (1970) How to define theoretical terms. The Journal of Philosophy 67(13): 427–446
Mantzavinos C. (2005) Naturalistic hermeneutics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Maxwell G. (1970) Structural realism and the meaning of theoretical terms. In: Winokur S., Radner M. (eds) Analyses of theories and methods of physics and psychology, Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. 4). University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp 181–192
Newman M. H. A. (1928) Mr. Russell’s ‘causal theory of perception’. Mind 37(146): 137–148
Olsson E., Westlund D. (2006) On the role of the research agenda in epistemic change. Erkenntnis 65(2): 165–183
Reichenbach H. (1957) The philosophy of space and time. Dover, New York
Reichenbach H. (1959) The present state of the discussion on relativity. In: Reichenbach H. (ed.) Modern philosophy of science: Selected essays by Hans Reichenbach. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, pp 1–45
Reichenbach H. (1965) The theory of relativity and a priori knowledge. University of California Press, California
Reichenbach H. (1969) Axiomatization of the theory of relativity. University of California Press, California
Rott H. (2008) Shifting priorities: Simple representations for twenty seven iterated theory change operators. In: Makinson D. (ed.) Towards mathematical philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–45
Schurz G. (2001) Normische Gesetzeshypothesen und die wissenschaftsphilosophische Bedeutung des nichtmonotonen Schliessens. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 32: 65–107
Schurz, G. (forthcoming). Structural correspondence between theories and the justification of scientific realism. Synthese.
van Benthem J. (1982) The logical study of science. Synthese 51: 431–472
van Benthem J. et al (1989) Semantic parallels in natural language and computation. In: Ebbinghaus H.-D. (ed.) Logic colloquium, granada 1987. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 331–375
van Benthem J. (2007) Dynamic logic of belief revision. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 17(2): 129–155
van Ditmarsch, H. P., van der Hoek, W., & Kooi, B. P. (2007). Dynamic epistemic logic (Synthese Library Vol. 337). New York: Springer.
Verein Ernst Mach (Eds.). (1929). Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung. Der Wiener Kreis. Vienna: Artur Wolf Verlag.
Worrall J. (1989) Structural realism: The best of both worlds?. dialectica 43: 99–124
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leitgeb, H. Logic in general philosophy of science: old things and new things. Synthese 179, 339–350 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9776-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9776-5