Abstract
The aim of this paper is to elucidate the mereological structure of complex states of affairs without relying on the problematic notion of structural universals. For this task tools from graph theory, lattice theory, and the theory of relational systems are employed. Our starting point is the mereology of similarity structures. Since similarity structures are structured sets, their mereology can be considered as a generalization of the mereology of ordinary sets. In general, the mereological systems arising from similarity structures turn out to be not Boolean but Heyting systems. Employing Armstrong’s notion of thick particulars, similarity structures are shown to capture the mereological structure of complex “chemical states of affairs” such as “being butane” or “being isobutane”; structural universals are not needed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armstrong D. M. (1986) In defence of structural universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64: 85–88
Armstrong D. M. (1997) A world of states of affairs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Bigelow J., Pargetter R. (1989) A theory of structural universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 67(1): 1–11
Davey B. A., Priestley H. (1990) Introduction to lattices and order. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Grätzer G. (1998) General lattice theory. Birkhäuser, Basel and Boston
Kalhat J. (2008) Structural universals and the principle of uniqueness of composition. Grazer Philosophische Studien 76(2008): 57–77
Lawvere F., Rosebrugh R. (2003) Set theory for mathematicians. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lawvere F., Schanuel P. (1996) Conceptual mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lewis, D. (1986). Against structural universals, in papers on metaphysics and epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 78–107, originally, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 64(1), 25–46.
Lewis D. (1991) Parts of classes. Basil Blackwell, Oxford
Mormann, T. (2009). Updating classical mereology. In C. Glymour, W. Wang, & D. Westerstahl (Eds.), Proceedings of the XIII. International conference on logic, methodology and philosophy of science, Beijing 2007 (pp. 326–343). London: King’s College Publications.
Mormann T. (2010) Structural universals as structural parts: Toward a general theory of parthood and composition. Axiomathes 20(2–3): 229–253
Pagés J. (2002) Structural relations and formal relations. Synthese 131(2): 215–221
Reyes G. E., Zolfaghari H. (1996) Bi-heyting algebras, toposes and modalities. The Journal of Philosophical Logic 25: 25–43
Simons P. (1987) Parts. A study in ontology. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Stout L.N. (1992) The logic of unbalanced subobjects in a category with two closed structures. In: Rodabaugh S.E., Klement E.P., Höhle U. (eds) Applications of category theory to fuzzy subsets. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 73–105
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mormann, T. On the mereological structure of complex states of affairs. Synthese 187, 403–418 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9828-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9828-x