Abstract
Newton characterizes the reasoning of Principia Mathematica as geometrical. He emulates classical geometry by displaying, in diagrams, the objects of his reasoning and comparisons between them. Examination of Newton’s unpublished texts (and the views of his mentor, Isaac Barrow) shows that Newton conceives geometry as the science of measurement. On this view, all measurement ultimately involves the literal juxtaposition—the putting-together in space—of the item to be measured with a measure, whose dimensions serve as the standard of reference, so that all quantity (which is what measurement makes known) is ultimately related to spatial extension. I use this conception of Newton’s project to explain the organization and proofs of the first theorems of mechanics to appear in the Principia (beginning in Sect. 2 of Book I). The placementof Kepler’s rule of areas as the first proposition, and the manner in which Newton proves it, appear natural on the supposition that Newton seeks a measure, in the sense of a moveable spatial quantity, of time. I argue that Newton proceeds in this way so that his reasoning can have the ostensive certainty of geometry.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aiton E. (1989) Polygons and parabolas. Centaurus 31: 207–221
Andersen K., Bos H. (2006) Pure mathematics. In: Porter R., Park K., Daston L. (eds) The Cambridge history of science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 696–726
Ariotti, P. (1972). Celestial reductionism of time. Studi internazionali di filosofia, Autunno.
Arthur R. T. W. (1995) Newton’s fluxions and equably flowing time. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 26: 323–351
Arthur R. T. W. (2008) Leery bedfellows: Newton and Leibniz on the status of infinitesimals. In: Goldenbaum U., Jesseph D. (eds) Infinitesimal differences. de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 7–30
Arthur, R. T. W. (2011, forthcoming). On Newton’s fluxional proof of the vector addition of motive forces. In C. Fraser & W. Harper (Eds.) Infinitesimals.
Barrow, I. (1734). The usefulness of mathematical learning explained and demonstrated: Being mathematical lectures read in the public schools of Cambridge (J. Kirkby, Trans.). London: Stephen Austen.
Barrow, I. (1860). Geometrical lectures. In W. Whewell (Ed.) The mathematical works of Isaac Barrow (E. Stone, Trans., London: Stephen Austen, 1735). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bos H. J. M. (2001) Redefining geometrical exactness. Springer, New York
Brackenridge B. (1995) The key to Newton’s dynamics. University of California Press, Berkeley
Brackenridge Bruce (2000) Newton’s dynamics: The diagram as a diagnostic device. In: Dalitz R. H., Nauenberg M. (eds) The foundations of Newtonian scholarship. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 71–102
Brackenridge B., Nauenberg M. (2002) Curvature in Newton’s dynamics. In: Cohen I.B., Smith G.E. (eds) Cambridge companion to Newton.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 85–137
Čapek M. (1976) Concepts of space and time. D. Reidel, Dordrecht
Cohen I. B. (1970) Newton’s second law and the concept of force in the Principia. In: Palter R. (eds) The Annus Mirabilis of Sir Isaac Newton 1666–1966. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, pp 143–185
Cohen, I. B. (1999). A guide to Newton’s Principia. In: I. Newton The Principia: mathematical principles of natural philosophy (I. Bernard Cohen & A. Whitman, Trans.) (pp. 1–370). Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Cohen, I. B., Smith, G. E. (eds) (2002) The Cambridge companion to Newton. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
De Gandt F. (1995) Force and geometry in Newton’s principia (C. Wilson, Trans). Princeton University Press, Princeton
Densmore D. (1995) Newton’s Principia: The central argument. Green Lion Press, Santa Fe
DiSalle R. (2002) Newton’s philosophical analysis of space and time. In: Cohen I. B., Smith G. E. (eds) Cambridge companion to Newton.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 85–137
Domski M. (2003) The constructible and the intelligible in Newton’s philosophy of geometry. Philosophy of Science 70: 1114–1124
Dreyer J. L. E. (1953) A history of astronomy from Thales to Kepler. Dover, New York
Dunlop K. (2011) What geometry postulates. In: Janiak A., Schliesser E. (eds) Interpreting Newton. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Edwards M. (2008) Time and perception in late Renaissance Aristotelianism. In: Knuuttila S., Kärkkäinen P. (eds) Theories of perception in medieval and early modern philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 225–244
Elzinga A. (1972) Huygens’ theory of research and Descartes’ theory of knowledge II. Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie/Journal for General Philosophy of Science 3: 9–27
Erlichson H. (1992) Newton’s polygon model and the second order fallacy. Centaurus 35: 243–258
Erlichson H. (2003) Passage to the limit in Proposition 1, Book I of Newton’s Principia. Historia Mathematica 30: 432–440
Feingold M. (1993) Newton, Leibniz, and Barrow too: An attempt at a reinterpretation. Isis 84: 310–338
Gabbey A. (1992) Newton’s Mathematical principles of natural philosophy: A treatise on ‘Mechanics’. In: Harman P., Shapiro A. (eds) The investigation of difficult things. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 305–322
Galileo, G. (1638). Discorsi e dimonstrazioni mathematichè intorno à due nuove scienze. In Opere (1890–1909) (Vol. viii). Edizione Nazionale. Florence: Barbèra.
Grant E. (1977) Physical science in the middle ages. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Grosholz E. (1987) Some uses of proportion in Newton’s Principia, Book I. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 18: 209–220
Guicciardini N. (1998) Reading the Principia. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Guicciardini N. (2003) Geometry and mechanics in the preface to Newton’s Principia. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 25: 119–159
Guicciardini N. (2009) Isaac Newton on mathematical certainty and method. MIT Press, Cambridge MA
Heath T. E. (Ed.). (1956). Euclid’s elements, 3 vols. New York: Dover.
Janiak A. (2008) Newton as philosopher. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Jesseph D. (1999) Squaring the circle. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Klein, J. (1992). Greek mathematical thought and the origin of algebra (E. Brann, Trans.). Cambridge: MIT Press (Reprint, New York: Dover).
Knorr, W. (1986). The ancient tradition of geometric problems Boston: Birkhäuser (Reprint, New York: Dover, 1993).
Macbeth D. (2004) Viète, Descartes, and the emergence of modern mathematics. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 25: 87–117
Mahoney M.S. (1980) The beginnings of algebraic thought in the seventeenth century. In: Stephen G. (eds) Descartes: Philosophy, mathematics, and physics.. Totowa, Barnes and Noble Books, pp 141–155
Mahoney M. S. (1990) Barrow’s mathematics: Between ancients and moderns. In: Feingold M. (eds) The life and times of Isaac Barrow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 179–249
Mahoney M. S. (1993) Algebraic vs. geometric techniques in Newton’s determination of planetary orbits. In: Theerman P., Seeff A. (eds) Action and reaction. University of Delaware Press, Newark, pp 183–205
Mancosu P. (1996) Philosophy of mathematics and mathematical practice in the seventeenth century. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Manders K. (2008) The Euclidean diagram. In: Mancosu P. (eds) The philosophy of mathematical practice.. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 80–133 (First appeared in 1995.)
Mueller I. (1981) Philosophy of mathematics and deductive structure in Euclid’s elements. MIT Press, Cambridge MA
Nauenberg M. (1998) The mathematical principles underlying the Principia revisited. Journal for the History of Astronomy 29: 286–300
Nauenberg M. (2003) Kepler’s area law in the Principia. Historia Mathematica 30: 441–456
Newton, I. (1959–1977). In H. W. Turnbull, J. F. Scott, A. Rupert Hall & L. Tilling (Eds.), The correspondence of Isaac Newton (7 vols). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Newton, I. (1964–1967). In D. T. Whiteside (Ed.), The mathematical writings of Isaac Newton (2 vols). New York: Johnson Reprint Corp.
Newton, I. (1967–1981). In D. T. Whiteside (Ed.), The mathematical papers of Isaac Newton (8 vols). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Newton, I. (1984). In A. E. Shapiro (Ed.), The optical papers of Isaac Newton (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Newton, I. (1999). The Principia: mathematical principles of natural philosophy (I. Bernard Cohen & A. Whitman, Trans.). Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Panza M. (2011) From velocities to fluxions. In: Janiak A., Schliesser E. (eds) Interpreting Newton. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Pourciau B. (2003) Newton’s argument for Proposition I of the Principia. Archive for History of the Exact Sciences 57: 267–311
Pourciau B. (2004) The importance of being equivalent: Newton’s two models of one-body motion. Archive for History of the Exact Sciences 58: 283–321
Roche J. (1998) The mathematics of measurement. London: Athlone Press, Springer, New York
Rynasiewicz R. (1995) By their properties, causes, and effects: Newton’s Scholium on time, space, place, and motion. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 26: 133–153
Sasaki C. (1985) The acceptance of the theory of proportion in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Historia Scientiarum 29: 83–116
Schemmel, M. (Forthcoming). Medieval representations of change and their early modern application. In A. Heeffer & M. van Dyck (Eds.), Proceedings of philosophical aspects of symbolic reasoning in the seventeenth century.
Stein H. (1970) Newtonian space-time. In: Palter R. (eds) The Annus Mirabilis of Sir Isaac Newton, 1666–1966. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 258–278
Strong E. W. (1951) Newton’s mathematical way. Journal of the History of Ideas 12: 90–110
Sylla E. (1984) Compounding ratios. In: Mendelsohn E. (eds) Transformation and tradition in the sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 11–43
Westfall R. (1980) Never at rest. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Westfall R. (1996) Technical Newton. Isis 87: 701–707
Whiteside D.T. (1966) Newtonian dynamics Review of The background to Newton’s Principia, by John Herivel. History of Science 5: 104–117
Whiteside D. T. (1966) The mathematical principles underlying Newton’s Principia Mathematica. Journal for the History of Astronomy 1: 116–138
Whiteside D. T. (1991) The prehistory of the Principia from 1664 to 1686. Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 45: 11–61
Wilson C. (1989) Predictive astronomy in the century after Kepler. In: Taton R., Wilson C. (eds) The general history of astronomy. Cambride University Press, Cambridge, pp 161–206
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dunlop, K. The mathematical form of measurement and the argument for Proposition I in Newton’s Principia . Synthese 186, 191–229 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-9983-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-9983-8