Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparative concepts

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Comparative concepts such as greener than or higher than are ways of ordering objects. They are fundamental to our grasp of gradable concepts, that is, the type of meanings expressed by gradable general terms, such as “is green” or “is high”, which are embeddable in comparative constructions in natural language. Some comparative concepts seem natural, whereas others seem gerrymandered. The aim of this paper is to outline a theoretical approach to comparative concepts that bears both on the account of naturalness for comparative concepts and on the theory of gradable concepts. The approach is novel in that it carries some basic assumptions from Peter Gärdenfors’ conceptual spaces account of categorical concepts over to comparative concepts. The offered approach is more general than Gärdenfors’ account in that it supplies a framework of graded categorisation that includes his categorisation rule as a limiting case. Importantly, it provides also a new argument for adopting Gärdenfors’ particular model of categorisation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow K. (1959) Rational choice functions and orderings. Economica 26: 121–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aurenhammer F., Klein R. (2000) Voronoi diagrams. In: Sack J.-R., Urrutia J. (Eds.), Handbook of computational geometry. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 201–290

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Beals R., Krantz D. H., Tversky A. (1968) Foundations of multidimensional scaling. Psychological Review 75: 127–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlin B., Kay P. (1969) Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromberger S. (1992) Types and tokens in linguistic theory. In: Bromberger S. (Ed.), On what we know we don’t know: Explanation, theory, linguistics, and how questions shape them. Chicago University Press, Chicago, pp 170–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap R. (1966) Philosophical foundations of physics: An introduction to the philosophy of science. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland P. M. (1986) Some reductive strategies in cognitive neurobiology. Mind 95: 279–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn A. G., Bennett B., Gooday J., Gotts N. M. (1997) Representing and reasoning with qualitative spatial relations about regions. In: Stock O. (Ed.), Temporal and spatial reasoning. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Davey B. A., Priestley H. A. (2002) Introduction to lattices and order (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Decock L. (2006) A physicalist reinterpretation of ‘phenomenal’ spaces. Phenomenology and Cognitive Sciences 5: 197–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douven, I., Decock, L., Dietz, R., & Egré, P. (2011). Vagueness: A conceptual spaces approach. Journal of Philosophical Logic. URL:http://www.springerlink.com/content/c3127t2006325352.

  • Du Q., Faber V., Gunzburger M. (1999) Centroidal Voronoi tesselations: Applications and algorithms. SIAM Review 41: 637–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox D., Hackl M. (2006) The universal density of measurement. Linguistics and Philosophy 29: 537–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors P. (2000) Conceptual spaces: The geometry of thought. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Geeraerts D. (2010) Theories of lexical semantics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone R. L., Son J. Y. (2005) Similarity. In: Holyoak K. J., Morrison R. G. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 13–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman N. (1983) Fact, fiction, forecast. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn U., Chater N. (1997) Concepts and similarity. In: Lamberts K., Shanks D. (Eds.), Knowledge, concepts and categories. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 43–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern J. Y. (2008) Intransitivity and vagueness. The Review of Symbolic Logic 1: 530–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton J. A. (1979) Polymorphous concepts in semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18: 441–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton J. A. (1993) Prototype models of concept representation. In: van Mechelen I., Hampton J. A., Michalski R. S., Theuns P. (Eds.), Categories and concepts: Theoretical views and inductive data analysis. Academic Press, London, pp 67–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton J. A. (1995) Testing the prototype theory of concepts. Journal of Memory and Language. 34: 686–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton J. A. (1998) Similarity-based categorization and fuzziness of natural categories. Cognition 65: 137–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton J. A. (2007) Typicality, graded membership, and vagueness. Cognitive Science 31: 355–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, C. L. (1993). Color for philosophers: Unweaving the rainbow (expanded ed.) Indianapolis: Hackett

  • Hempel C. G. (1952) Fundamentals of concept formation in empirical science. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Jäger, G. (2010). Natural color categories are convex sets. In Aloni, M., Bastiaanse, H., de Jager, T., & Schulz, K. (Eds.), Logic, language and meaning. 17th Amsterdam Colloquium, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, December 16–18, 2009, Revised Selected Papers, Berlin: Springer, pp. 11–20.

  • Jäger G., Koch-Metzger L., Riedel F. (2011) Voronoi languages. Games and Economic Behavior 73: 517–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamp H. (1975) Two theories of adjectives. In: Keenan E. (Ed.), Formal semantics of natural language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 123–155

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kamp H., Partee B. (1995) Prototype theory and compositionality. Cognition 57: 129–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein E. (1980) The semantics of positive and comparative adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 4: 1–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, E., & Rovatsos, M. (2009). Modelling vagueness in computational semantics, slide show presented at the ESSLLI, Bordeaux

  • Koons R. C. (1994) A new solution to the sorites problem. Mind 103: 439–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert K., van Fraassen B. C. (1970) Meaning relations, possible objects, and possible worlds. In: Lambert K. (Ed.), Philosophical problems in logic: Some recent developments. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Landman F. (1991) Structures for semantics. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis D. (1986) On the plurality of worlds. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Machery E. (2009) Doing without concepts. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey M., Glucksberg S. (1978) Natural categories: Well-defined or fuzzy sets?. Memory and Cognition 6: 462–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNally L. (2006) Lexical representation and modification within the noun phrase. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 34: 191–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Medin D. L., Schaffer M. M. (1978) Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review 85: 207–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minsky M. (1975) A framework for representing knowledge. In: Winston P. H. (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 211–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Mormann T. (1993) Natural predicates and topological structures of conceptual spaces. Synthese 95: 219–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosofski R. (1986) Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115: 39–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosofski R. (1988) Exemplar-based accounts of relations between classification, recognition, and typicality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 14: 700–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosofski R. (1992) Similarity scaling and cognitive process models. Annual Review of Psychology 43: 25–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oddie G. (2005) Value, reality, and desire. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Okabe, A., Boots, B., Sugihara, K., & Chiu, S. N. (2000). Spatial tesselations: Concepts and applications of Voronoi diagrams (2nd rev. ed.) New York: Wiley

  • Osherson D. N., Smith E. E. (1981) On the adequacy of prototype theory as a theory of concepts. Cognition 11: 35–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed S. K. (1972) Pattern recognition and categorization. Cognitive Psychology 3: 382–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rips L. J. (1975) Inductive learning about natural categories. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 14: 664–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosch E. (1975) Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104: 192–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosch E., Mervis C. B. (1975) Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categiories. Cognitive Psychology 7: 573–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapir E. (1944) Grading: A study in semantics. Philosophy of Science 11: 93–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassoon, G. W. (2007). Vagueness, gradability and typicality: A comprehensive semantic analysis, doctoral dissertation, Tel Aviv University.

  • Schwarzschild R. (2008) The semantics of comparatives and other degree constructions. Language and Linguistics Compass 2: 308–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard R. (1987) Towards a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science 237: 1317–1323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivik L., Taft C. (1994) Color naming: A mapping in the NCS of common color terms. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 35: 144–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith E. E., Osherson D. N., Rips L. J., Keane M. (1988) Combining prototypes: A selective modification model. Cognitive Science 12: 485–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker R. (1979) Anti-essentialism. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4: 434–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storms G., De Boeck P., van Mechelen I., Ruts W. (1996) The dominance effect in concept conjunctions: Generality and interactional aspects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22: 1266–1280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suppes P., Krantz D. H., Luce R. D., Tversky A. (1989) Foundations of Measurement. Vol. II: Geometrical, Threshold, and Probabilistic Representations. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Tribushinina, E. (2008). Cognitive reference points: Semantics beyond the prototypes in adjectives of space and colour, doctoral dissertation, University of Leiden, (LOT Dissertation Series 192) Utrecht: LOT.

  • Tversky A. (1977) Features of similarity. Psychological Review 84: 327–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A., Gati I. (1982) Similarity, separability, and the triangle inequality. Psychological Review 89: 123–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Benthem J. (1982) Later than late: On the logical origin of the temporal order. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 63: 193–203

    Google Scholar 

  • van Rooij R. et al (2009) Revealed preference and satisficing behavior. In: Bonano G. (Eds.), Proceedings of LOFT 2008. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • van Rooij R. (2010) Measurement and interadjective comparisons. Journal of Semantics 28: 335–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Rooij R. (2011) Vagueness and linguistics. In: Ronzitti G. (Ed.), Vagueness: A guide. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Letters, University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan

    Richard Dietz

Authors
  1. Richard Dietz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Dietz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dietz, R. Comparative concepts. Synthese 190, 139–170 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0152-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0152-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation