Skip to main content
Log in

DFT-D: a cognitive-dynamical model of dynamic decision making

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study of decision making has traditionally been dominated by axiomatic utility theories. More recently, an alternative approach, which focuses on the micro-mechanisms of the underlying deliberation process, has been shown to account for several “paradoxes” in human choice behavior for which simple utility-based approaches cannot. Decision field theory (DFT) is a cognitive-dynamical model of decision making and preferential choice, built on the fundamental principle that decisions are based on the accumulation of subjective evaluations of choice alternatives until a threshold criterion is met. This article extends the basic DFT framework to the domain of dynamic decision making. DFT-Dynamic is proposed as a new alternative to normative backward induction. Through its attention to the processes underlying planning and deliberation DFT-D provides simple, emergent explanations for violations of choice principles traditionally taken as evidence of irrationality. A recent multi-stage decision making study is used to showcase the model’s efficacy for developing cognitive models of individual strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allais M. (1953) Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulats et axiomes de l’école Américaine. Econometrica 21: 503–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aschenbrenner K. M., Albert D., Schmalhofer F. (1984) Stochastic choice heuristics. Acta Psychologica 56(1–3): 153–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby F. G. (2000) A stochastic version of general recognition theory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 44: 310–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busemeyer J. R. (1985) Decision making under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psycology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 11: 538–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busemeyer J. R., Diederich A. (2010) Cognitive modeling. Sage, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Busemeyer J. R., Goldstein D. (1992) Linking together different measures of preference: A dynamic model of matching derived from decision field theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 52: 370–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busemeyer J. R., Townsend J. T. (1993) Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psychological Review 100(3): 432–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busemeyer J. R., Weg E., Barkan R., Li X., Ma Z. (2000) Dynamic and consequential consistency of choices between paths of decision trees. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129(4): 530–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbone E., Hey J. D. (2001) A test of the principle of optimality. Theory and Decision 50: 263–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeGroot M. H. (1970) Optimal statistical decisions. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Diederich A. (2003) Decision making under conflict: Decision time as a measure of conflict strength. Psychological Science 10: 353–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diederich A., Busemeyer J. R. (2003) Simple matrix methods for analyzing diffusion models of choice probability, choice response time, and simple response time. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 47: 304–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E., Rangel A. (2011) Neuroeconomic foundations of economic choice—recent advance. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 25(4): 3–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hey J. D., Knoll J. A. (2011) Strategies in dynamic decision making—an experimental investigation of the rationality of decision behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology 32: 399–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hotaling J. M., Busemeyer J. R., Li J. (2010) Theoretical developments in decision field theory: Comment on Tsetsos, Chater, & Usher. Psychological Review 117(4): 1294–1298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson J. G., Busemeyer J. R. (2001) Multiple-stage decision-making: The effect of planning horizon length on dynamic consistency. Theory and Decision 51: 217–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson J. G., Busemeyer J. R. (2005) A dynamic, stochastic, computatonal model of preference reversal phenomena. Psychological Review 112(4): 841–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision making under risk. Econometrica 47: 263–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laming D. R. (1968) Information theory of choice-reaction times. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Link S. W., Heath R. (1975) A sequential theory of psychological discrimination. Psychometrika 40: 77–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marr D. (1982) Vision: A computational approach. Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Nosofsky R. M., Palmeri T. J. (1997) Exemplar-based accounts of relations between classification, recognition, and typicality. Psychological Review 104(2): 266–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne J. W., Bettman J. R., Johnson E. J. (1993) The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliff R. (1978) A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review 85(2): 59–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roe R. M., Busemeyer J. R., Townsend J. T. (2001) Multialternative decision field theory: A dynamic connectionist model of decision making. Psychological Review 108(2): 370–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith P. L. (1995) Psychophysically principled models of visual simple reaction time. Psychological Review 102(3): 567–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svenson O., Edland A. (1987) Changes of preference under time pressure: Choices and judgements. Scandanavian Journal of Psychology 28: 322–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usher M., McClelland J. L. (2001) The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychological Review 108(3): 550–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickers D. (1979) Decision processes in visual perception. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallsten T. S., Barton C. (1982) Processing probabilistic multidimensional information for decisions. Journal of Experimental Psycology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 8: 361–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jared M. Hotaling.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hotaling, J.M., Busemeyer, J.R. DFT-D: a cognitive-dynamical model of dynamic decision making. Synthese 189 (Suppl 1), 67–80 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0157-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0157-0

Keywords

Navigation