Skip to main content
Log in

Logic of confidence

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article studies knowledge in multiagent systems where data available to the agents may have small errors. To reason about such uncertain knowledge, a formal semantics is introduced in which indistinguishability relations, commonly used in the semantics for epistemic logic S5, are replaced with metrics to capture how much two epistemic worlds are different from an agent’s point of view. The main result is a logical system sound and complete with respect to the proposed semantics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Artemov, S. (2008). The logic of justification. The Review of Symbolic Logic, 1(04), 477–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burago, D., Burago, Y., & Ivanov, S. (2001). A course in metric geometry (Vol. 33). Providence: American Mathematical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charrier, T., Ouchet, F., & Schwarzentruber, F. (2014). Big brother logic: Reasoning about agents equipped with surveillance cameras in the plane. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems (pp. 1633–1634). New York: International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.

  • Halpern, J. Y., & Shoham, Y. (1991). A propositional modal logic of time intervals. Journal of the ACM, 38(4), 935–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamming, R. W. (1950). Error detecting and error correcting codes. Bell System Technical Journal, 29(2), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khot, S., & Saket, R. (2007). Hardness of embedding metric spaces of equal size. In: Approximation, randomization, and combinatorial optimization. Algorithms and techniques (pp. 218–227). New York: Springer.

  • Krause, E. F. (2012). Taxicab geometry: An adventure in non-Euclidean geometry. New York: Courier Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milnikel, R. S. (2014). The logic of uncertain justifications. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 165(1), 305–315. The constructive in logic and applications.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, L. S., & Parikh, R. (1992). Topological reasoning and the logic of knowledge: preliminary report. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Knowledge (pp. 95–105). Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.

  • Rudin, W. (1976). Principles of mathematical analysis., International series in pure and applied mathematics Blacklick: McGraw-Hill Science Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlqvist, H. (1975). Completeness and correspondence in the first and second order semantics for modal logic. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, 82, 110–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheremet, M., Wolter, F., & Zakharyaschev, M. (2010). A modal logic framework for reasoning about comparative distances and topology. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 161(4), 534–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pavel Naumov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naumov, P., Tao, J. Logic of confidence. Synthese 192, 1821–1838 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0655-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0655-3

Keywords

Navigation