Skip to main content
Log in

Quasi-canonical systems and their semantics

  • S.I.: Varieties of Entailment
  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A canonical (propositional) Gentzen-type system is a system in which every rule has the subformula property, it introduces exactly one occurrence of a connective, and it imposes no restrictions on the contexts of its applications. A larger class of Gentzen-type systems which is also extensively in use is that of quasi-canonical systems. In such systems a special role is given to a unary connective \(\lnot \) of the language (usually, but not necessarily, interpreted as negation). Accordingly, each application of a logical rule in such systems introduces either a formula of the form \(\diamond (\psi _1,\ldots ,\psi _n)\), or of the form \(\lnot \diamond (\psi _1,\ldots ,\psi _n)\), and all the active formulas of its premises belong to the set \(\{\psi _1,\ldots ,\psi _n,\lnot \psi _1,\ldots ,\lnot \psi _n\}\). In this paper we investigate the whole class of quasi-canonical systems. We provide a constructive coherence criterion for such systems, and show that a quasi-canonical system is coherent iff it is analytic iff it has a characteristic non-deterministic matrix (Nmatrix) which is based on some subset of the set of the four truth-values which are used in the famous Dunn–Belnap four-valued (deterministic) matrix for information processing. In addition, we determine when a quasi-canonical system admits (strong) cut-elimination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Note that the term “quasi-canonical system” has been extended in Ciabattoni et al. (2013) to a more extensive class, in which more than one special unary connective can be is used. In this paper we stick to the original definition of Avron et al. (2013).

  2. An early central example of a quasi-canonical system is the system \(\mathrm{LE_{fde2}}\) for the logic of first-degree entailments given in Anderson and Belnap (1975, p. 179). Many more examples can e.g. be found in Avron et al. (2018).

  3. Note that in Avron and Lev (2001) and Avron and Lev (2005) G is called canonical if it is quasi-canonical, but has no rules of type \((\lnot \diamond \Rightarrow )\) or of type \((\Rightarrow \lnot \diamond )\), and the premises of all the rules are ordinary clauses.

  4. The notation “\(\vdash _\mathcal{M}\)” is overloaded here, but this should not cause any confusion.

  5. Note that by (ii), \(\tilde{\lnot }(a)\in \{\{t,\top \},\{f,\bot \},\{t\},\{f\},\{\top \},\{\bot \}\}\).

  6. The theorem holds for infinite sets as well, but we shall not need this fact.

  7. This can be justified by modifying the proof given below in a standard way, using infinite \(\Gamma ^*\) and \(\Delta ^*\).

  8. In addition to the results from Avron (2014) which are generalized and systematized here, that paper includes many other results which are important for the two cases in which \(\lnot \) can be taken as a negation.

References

  • Anderson, A. R., & Belnap, N. D. (1975). Entailment: The logic of relevance and necessity (Vol. I). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avron, A. (2014). Paraconsistency, paracompleteness, Gentzen systems, and trivalent semantics. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, 24(1–2), 12–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avron, A., Arieli, O. & Zamansky, A. (2018). Theory of Effective Propositional Paraconsitent Logics, volume 75 of Studies in logic mathematical logic and foundations. College Publications

  • Avron, A., & Konikowska, B. (2005). Multi-valued calculi for logics based on non-determinism. Journal of the Interest Group in Pure and Applied Logic, 10, 365–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avron, A., Konikowska, B., & Zamansky, A. (2013). Cut-free sequent calculi for C-systems with generalized finite-valued semantics. Journal of Logic and Computation, 23(3), 517–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avron, A., & Lev, I. (2001). Canonical propositional gentzen-type systems. In: Proceedings of the 1st international joint conference on automated reasoning (IJCAR 2001), LNAI 2083. Springer

  • Avron, A., & Lev, I. (2005). Non-deterministic multi-valued structures. Journal of Logic and Computation, 15, 241–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avron, A., & Zamansky, A. (2011). Non-deterministic semantics for logical systems—A survey. In D. Gabbay & F. Guenther (Eds.), Handbook of philosophical logic (Vol. 16, pp. 227–304). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Belnap, N. D. (1977). A useful four-valued logic. In J. M. Dunn & G. Epstein (Eds.), Modern uses of multiple-valued logics (pp. 7–37). Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciabattoni, A., Lahav, O., Spendier, L., & Zamansky, A. (2013). Automated support for the investigation of paraconsistent and other logics. In S. Artemov & A. Nerode (Eds.), Logical Foundations of Computer Science, number 7734 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 119–133). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. M. (1976). Intuitive semantics for first-degree entailments and ‘coupled trees’. Philosophical Studies, 29, 149–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by The Israel Science Foundation (Grant No. 817-15).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arnon Avron.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Avron, A. Quasi-canonical systems and their semantics. Synthese 198 (Suppl 22), 5353–5371 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-02045-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-02045-0

Keywords

Navigation