Skip to main content
Log in

Scalable optical switch with internal fiber network

  • Published:
Telecommunication Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present architecture of a large dynamic optical packet/burst switch comprising a number of smaller switching fabrics that are interconnected by internal fiber links. The switching fabrics are based on the broadcast-and-select architecture, while the internal interconnection network is a full mesh. An extensive performance study has been performed and results regarding scalability, packet/burst loss rate and achievable throughput for four scheduling algorithms are shown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aleksic, S. (2006). Design considerations for a high-speed metro network using all-optical packet processing. In International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON 2006) (Vol. 3, pp. 82–86).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Aleksic, S. (2007). A novel packet/burst switch architecture comprising internal fiber rings. In International conference on telecommunications (ConTEL 2007), Zagreb, Croatia (Vol. 1, pp. 31–35).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Aleksic, S. (2009). Analysis of power consumption in future high-capacity network nodes. Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, 1(3), 245–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aleksic, S. (2011). Optically transparent integrated metro-access network. Telecommunications Systems, 52, 1505–1515. doi:10.1007/s11235-011-9515-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aleksic, S. (2013). Energy-efficient communication networks for improved global energy productivity. Telecommunication Systems. doi:10.1007/s11235-013-9726-x.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Aleksic, S., Krajinovic, V., & Bengi, K. (2001). An overview on technologies for access nodes in ultra-fast otdm photonic networks. Photonic Network Communications, 3(1/2), 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Aziz, K., Sarwar, S., & Aleksic, S. (2008). Dimensioning an optical packet/burst switch—more interconnections or more delay lines? In International conference on optical network design and modeling (ONDM 2008) (pp. 1–6).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Fiorani, M., Casoni, M., & Aleksic, S. (2011). Performance and power consumption analysis of a hybrid optical core node. Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, 3(6), 502–513. doi:10.1364/JOCN.3.000502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Guillemot, C., Renaud, M., Gambini, P., Janz, C., Andonovic, I., Bauknecht, R., Bostica, B., Burzio, M., Callegati, F., Casoni, M., Chiaroni, D., Clerot, F., Danielsen, S., Dorgeuille, F., Dupas, A., Franzen, A., Hansen, P., Hunter, D., Kloch, A., Krahenbuhl, R., Lavigne, B., Le Corre, A., Raffaelli, C., Schilling, M., Simon, J. C., & Zucchelli, L. (1998). Transparent optical packet switching: the European acts keops project approach. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 16(12), 2117–2134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hansen, P. B., Joergensen, C., Danielsen, S. L., Mikkelsen, B., & Stubkjaer, K. E. (1997). Cascadability of broadcast and select switch blocks with interferometric wavelength converters at 10 gbit/s. In Conference on optical fiber communication (OFC 1997), Dallas, TX, USA (pp. 148–149).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Inghelbrecht, V., Steyaert, B., Wittevrongel, S., & Bruneel, H. (2006). Burst loss and delay in optical buffers with offset-time management. Telecommunications Systems, 31, 247–258. doi:10.1007/s11235-006-6523-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lowery, A. J. (1987). New dynamic semiconductor laser model based on the transmission-line modelling method. IEEE Photonics Journal, 134(5), 281–289.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Maach, A., Bochman, G. V., & Mouftah, H. (2004). Congestion control and contention elimination in optical burst switching. Telecommunications Systems, 27, 115–131. doi:10.1023/B:TELS.0000041005.87009.e5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nandi, M., Turuk, A. K., Puthal, D. K., & Dutta, S. (2009). Best fit void filling algorithm in optical burst switching networks. In Second international conference on emerging trends in engineering & technology (pp. 609–614).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Papadimitriou, G. I., Papazoglou, C., & Pomportsis, A. S. (2003). Optical switching: switch fabrics, techniques, and architectures. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 21(2), 384–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Raffaelli, C., Aleksic, S., Callegati, F., Cerroni, W., Pattavina, A., & Savi, M. (2009). Optical packet switching. In J. Aracil & F. Callegati (Eds.), Enabling optical Internet with advanced network technologies (Vol. 5, pp. 31–85).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Ricciardi, S., Careglio, D., Santos-Boada, G., Solé-Pareta, J., Fiore, U., & Palmieri, F. (2011). Towards an energy-aware Internet: modeling a cross-layer optimization approach. Telecommunications Systems, 52(2), 1247–1268. doi:10.1007/s11235-011-9645-7.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vlachos, K., Raffaelli, C., Aleksic, S., Andriolli, N., Apostolopoulos, D., Avramopoulos, H., Erasme, D., Klonidis, D., Scaffardi, M., Schulze, K., Spiropoulou, M., Sygletos, S., Tomkos, I., Vazquez, C., Zouraraki, O., & Neri, F. (2009). Photonics in switching: enabling technologies and subsystem design. The Journal of Optical Networking, 8(5), 404–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vokkarane, V. A., Jue, J. P., & Sitaraman, S. (2002). Burst segmentation: an approach for reducing packet loss in optical burst switched networks. In IEEE international conference on communications (pp. 2673–2677).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Xu, L., & Perros, H.G., & Rouskas, G.N. (2001). A survey of optical packet switching and optical burst switching. IEEE Communications Magazine, 39(1), 136–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xiong, Y., Vandenhoute, M., & Cankaya, H. C. (2000). Control architecture in optical burst-switched wdm networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 18, 1838–1851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yoo, S. J. B. (2006). Optical packet and burst switching technologies for the future photonic Internet. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 24(12), 4468–4492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Slavisa Aleksic.

Appendix: Model of the gain-clamped SOA

Appendix: Model of the gain-clamped SOA

Semiconductor optical amplifiers can be modelled using either single-section or multiple-section models. The gain and the phase-shift depend on the carrier density. For our purpose, we used a two-directional distributed time-domain model of SOA based of a modification of the transmission line laser modelling method [12]. The model divides device into n longitudinal sections. In each section of length ΔL, the carrier dynamics are described by the following rate equations for carrier density:

$$ \frac{dN_e}{dt}=\frac{J}{ed}-A N_e-B N_e^2-C N_e^3-\frac{v_g g_{nl}}{\Delta L} , $$
(8)

where J is the injection current density, e is the electron charge, d is the thickness of the active layer, v g is the group velocity, N e is the carrier density, S is the photon density, and A, B, and C are the monomolecular, bimolecular, and Auger recombination coefficients, respectively. Photon densities are obtained from field strengths in both longitudinal directions:

$$ S=|E_R|^2 + |E_L|^2 , $$
(9)

where E R and E L are fields travelling in the right and left direction, respectively. Thus, the model represents interactions of the local optical fields and the carrier density within a section, while the carrier density is assumed to be homogeneous within a section rather than along the whole device. This allows a consideration of inhomogenities along the length of the active region as well as an inclusion of spectral hole burning (SHB) effect in the model. The material gain of a section is governed by the carrier density within this section. It is calculated using the following expression:

$$ g_{nl}= a \varGamma \Delta L (N_e - N_{et}) \frac{S}{1+ \varepsilon S} , $$
(10)

where N et is the carrier density at the transparency point (the point where g=0), and a is the gain cross section also known as the differential gain coefficient. Because the carrier density is assumed to be constant across a section, the unsaturated gain factor is also constant. The material gain nonlinearity induced phenomenologically by the gain compression parameter, ε and caused by the finite intraband relaxation times of the carriers implies a reduction of gain by 1/(1+εS). Thus, the gain saturates for high photon densities. The intraband processes include effects such as SHB and carrier heating, which do not affect the total carrier density, but lead to a change in the carrier distribution within the conduction and valence band. To describe the non-instantaneous nature of the gain nonlinearity, a time constant, t nl , is used to filter the instantaneous photon density in the calculation of the nonlinear gain. The amplification of the field within a section is then given by:

$$ E_{R,L}^o (\Delta L)= E_{R,L}^i (0) \exp \bigl[G(1+i \alpha)\bigr] , $$
(11)

where G represents the field gain coefficient across the section, i.e., G=exp[(g nl a s )/ΔL], a s is the waveguide attenuation factor, and α is the linewidth enhancement factor. \(E^{o}_{R,L}\) and \(E^{i}_{R,L}\) are fields at the right and left inputs and the outputs of a model section, respectively. The phase shift between fields at the input and output of the amplifier in dependence of the carrier concentration induced refractive index change can be then calculated according to: Δφ=−Γαg nl ΔL/2. A gain-clamped SOA is realized by placing two distributed Bragg reflectors (DBRs) at both sides of the active region, thereby achieving lasing in the SOA cavity at a wavelength different from the signal wavelength. These passive DBR sections were modelled using the same model as for the active region, but without the gain model. The index-coupling is represented by alternate low and high impedance subsections. In this manner, the modulation of the refractive index along the waveguide structure can be effectively modelled.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aleksic, S., Aziz, K. Scalable optical switch with internal fiber network. Telecommun Syst 55, 471–479 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-013-9802-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-013-9802-2

Keywords

Navigation