Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An energy efficient DOA estimation algorithm for uncorrelated and coherent signals in virtual MIMO systems

  • Published:
Telecommunication Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The multiple input and multiple output (MIMO) and smart antenna (SA) technique have been widely accepted as promising schemes to improve the spectrum efficiency and coverage of mobile communication systems. The definition of direction-of-arrival (DOA) estimation is that multiple directions of incident signals can be estimated simultaneously by some algorithms using the received data. The conventional DOA estimation of user equipments (UEs) is one by one, which is named as sequential scheme. The Virtual MIMO (VMIMO) scheme is that the base station (BS) estimates the DOAs of UEs in a parallel way, which adopts the SA simultaneously. Obviously, when the power is fixed, the VMIMO scheme is much more energy efficient than the sequential scheme. In VMIMO scheme, a set of UEs are grouped together to simultaneously communicate with the BS on a given resource block. Then the BS using multiple antennas can estimate the 2D-DOA of the UEs in the group simultaneously. Based on VMIMO system, the 2D-DOA estimation algorithm for uncorrelated and coherent signals is proposed in this paper. The special structure of mutual coupling matrix (MCM) of uniform linear array (ULA) is applied to eliminate the effect of mutual coupling. The 2D-DOA of uncorrelated signals can be estimated by DOA-matrix method. The parameter pairing between azimuth and elevation is accomplished. Then these estimations are utilized to get the mutual coupling coefficients. Based on spatial smoothing and DOA matrix method, the 2D-DOA of coherent signals can be estimated. The Cramer–Rao lower bound is derived at last. Simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness and performance of the proposed algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aruna, T., & Suganthi, M. (2012). Variable power adaptive MIMO OFDM system under imperfect CSI for mobile ad hoc networks. Telecommunication Systems, 50(1), 47–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bao, Q., Ko, C. C., & Zhi, W. (2005). DOA estimation under unknown mutual coupling and multipath. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 41(2), 565–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cadzow, J. A., Kim, Y. S., Shiue, D., Sun, Y., & Xu, G. (1987). Resolution of coherent signals using a linear array. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (pp. 1597–1600).

  4. Cadzow, J., Kim, Y., & Shiue, D. (1989). General direction-of -arrival estimation: A signal subspace approach. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 25(1), 31–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, H., Pan, Z., Tian, L., Shi, J., Yang, G., & Suzuki, M. (2013). A novel AWSF algorithm for DOA estimation in virtual MIMO systems. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 31(10), 1994–2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, Z., Yuan, J., & Vucetic, B. (2005). Analysis of transmit antenna selection/maximal-ratio combining in Rayleigh fading channels. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 54(4), 1312–1321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chung, J., Yun, Y., & Choi, S. (2013). Experiments on MIMO-OFDM system combined with adaptive beamforming based on IEEE 802.16 e WMAN standard. Telecommunication Systems, 52(4), 1931–1944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dai, J., Xu, W., & Zhao, D. (2012). Real-valued DOA estimation for uniform linear array with unknown mutual coupling. Signal Processing, 92(9), 2056–2065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dai, J., & Ye, Z. (2011). Spatial moothing for direction of arrival estimation of coherent signals in the presence of unknown mutual coupling. IET Signal Processing, 5(4), 418–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Di, A., & Tian, L. (1984). Matrix decomposition and multiple source location. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (pp. 722–725).

  11. Di, A. (1985). Multiple source location: A matrix decomposition approach. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 33(5), 1086–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Friedlander, B., & Weiss, A. J. (1991). Direction finding in the presence of mutual coupling. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 39(3), 273–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gan, L., & Luo, X. (2013). Direction-of-arrival estimation for uncorrelated and coherent signals in the presence of multipath propagation. IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation, 7(9), 746–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Han, G., Xu, H., Duong, T. Q., Jiang, J., & Hara, T. (2013). Localization algorithms of wireless sensor networks: A survey. Telecommunication Systems, 52(4), 2419–2436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. He, J., & Liu, Z. (2009). Extended aperture 2-D direction finding with a two-parallel-shape-array using propagator method. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 8, 323–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jiang, J., Han, G., Zhu, C., Dong, Y., & Zhang, N. (2011). Secure localization in wireless sensor networks: A survey. Journal of Communications, 6(6), 460–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Karimi, O. B., Toutounchian, M. A., Liu, J., & Wang, C. (2013). Lightweight user grouping with flexible degrees of freedom in virtual MIMO. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 31(10), 2004–2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kuchar, A., Tangemann, M., & Bonek, E. (2002). A real-time DOA-based smart antenna processor. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 51(6), 1279–1293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Li, J., Zhang, X., & Chen, H. (2012). Improved two-dimensional DOA estimation algorithm for two-parallel uniform linear arrays using propagator method. Signal Processing, 92(12), 3032–3038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Li, P., Xu, J., & Yu, B. (1997). An efficient method in array processing for eliminating the signal cancellation phenomena of the differencing method. Signal Processing, 56(3), 305–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu, F., Wang, J., Sun, C., & Du, R. (2012). Spatial differencing method for DOA estimation under the coexistence of both uncorrelated and coherent signals. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 60(4), 2052–2062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu, Z., Huang, Z., Wang, F., & Zhou, Y. (2009). DOA estimation with uniform linear arrays in the presence of mutual coupling via blind calibration. Signal Processing, 89(7), 1446–1456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mohammadi, A., & Ghannouchi, F. M. (2011). Single RF front-end MIMO transceivers. IEEE Communications Magazine, 49(12), 104–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ntontin, K., Di Renzo, M., Perez-Neira, A., & Verikoukis, C. (2013). A low-complexity method for antenna selection in spatial modulation systems. IEEE Communications Letters, 17(12), 2312–2315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Qi, C., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., & Han, Y. (2005). Spatial difference smoothing for DOA estimation of coherent signals. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 12(11), 800–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Roy, R., & Kailath, T. (1989). ESPRIT-estimation of signal parameters via rotational invariance techniques. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 37(7), 984–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Schmidt, R. O. (1986). Multiple emitter location and signal parameter estimation. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 34(3), 276–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Swindlehurst, A. L., & Kailath, T. (1992). A performance analysis of subspace-based methods in the presence of model errors. I. The MUSIC algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 40(7), 1758–1774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tang, L., Chen, Q., Wang, G., Zeng, X., & Wang, H. (2013). Opportunistic power allocation strategies and fair subcarrier allocation in OFDM-based cognitive radio networks. Telecommunication Systems, 52(4), 2071–2082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tao, H., Xin, J., Wang, J., Zheng, N., & Sano, A. (2013). Two-dimensional direction of arrival estimation method for a mixture of noncoherent and coherent narrowband signals. In 2013 IEEE 14th Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (pp. 440–444).

  31. Wang, H., & Liu, K. R. (1998). 2-D spatial smoothing for multipath coherent signal separation. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 34(2), 391–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wen, H., Gong, G., Lv, S. C., & Ho, P. H. (2013). Framework for MIMO cross-layer secure communication based on STBC. Telecommunication Systems, 52(4), 2177–2185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Williams, R. T., Prasad, S., Mahalanabis, A. K., & Sibul, L. H. (1988). An improved spatial smoothing technique for bearing estimation in a multipath environment. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 36(4), 425–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Xia, T., Zheng, Y., Wan, Q., & Wang, X. (2007). Decoupled estimation of 2-D angles of arrival using two parallel uniform linear arrays. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 55(9), 2627–2632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Xu, X., & Ye, Z. (2012). Two-dimensional direction of arrival estimation by exploiting the symmetric configuration of uniform rectangular array. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 6(5), 307–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Xu, X., Ye, Z., & Peng, J. (2007). Method of direction-of-arrival estimation for uncorrelated, partially correlated and coherent sources. IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation, 1(4), 949–954.

  37. Xu, X., Ye, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2009). DOA estimation for mixed signals in the presence of mutual coupling. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 57(9), 3523–3532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ye, Z., Dai, J., Xu, X., & Wu, X. (2009). DOA estimation for uniform linear array with mutual coupling. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 45(1), 280–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ye, Z., & Liu, C. (2008). On the resiliency of MUSIC direction finding against antenna sensor coupling. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 56(2), 371–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ye, Z., & Xu, X. (2007). DOA estimation by exploiting the symmetric configuration of uniform linear array. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 55(12), 3716–3720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ye, Z., Zhang, Y., & Xu, X. (2009). Two-dimensional direction of arrival estimation in the presence of uncorrelated and coherent signals. IET Signal Processing, 3(5), 416–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang, Y., Ye, Z., Xu, X., & Cui, J. (2010). Estimation of two-dimensional direction-of-arrival for uncorrelated and coherent signals with low complexity. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 4(4), 507–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhou, Y., & Ng, T. S. (2009). Performance analysis on MIMO-OFCDM systems with multi-code transmission. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 8(9), 4426–4433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhu, H., & Wang, J. (2009). Chunk-based resource allocation in OFDMA systems: Part I: Chunk allocation. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 57(9), 2734–2744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhu, H., & Wang, J. (2012). Chunk-based resource allocation in OFDMA systems: Part II: Joint chunk, power and bit allocation. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 60(2), 499–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the Qing Lan Project, the National Science Foundation of China under Grant 61201410 and 61401147, the Natural Science Foundation of JiangSu Province of China,No.BK20140248, the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Program No. HEUCF140803).This work has been partially supported by Instituto de Telecomunicações, Next Generation Networks and Applications Group (NetGNA), Covilhã Delegation, by Government of Russian Federation, Grant 074-U01, and by National Funding from the FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia through the Pest-OE/EEI/LA0008/2013 Project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Guangjie Han or Weijian Si.

Appendix

Appendix

The Cramer–Rao lower bound (CRB) of 1D-DOA estimation in the presence of mutual coupling is given in [12, 37]. In this Appendix, the CRB of joint 2D-DOA and mutual coupling estimation is derived. Consider the array output vector \(\mathbf {x}\left( t \right) \) as a complex Gaussian vector with zero mean. Define \(\mathbf {A} \buildrel \varDelta \over = \left[ {{\mathbf {A}_c},{\mathbf {A}_u}} \right] \), \(\mathbf {E} \buildrel \varDelta \over = blkdiag\left[ {\varvec{\Gamma } ,{\mathbf {I}_{{K_u}}}} \right] \) , the covariance matrix of \(\mathbf {x}\left( t \right) \) is expressed as

$$\begin{aligned} {\mathbf {R}_x} = E\left\{ {\mathbf {x}\left( t \right) \mathbf {x}{{\left( t \right) }^H}} \right\} = \mathbf {CAE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H} \end{aligned}$$
(64)

For L statistically independent observations of \(\mathbf {x}\left( t \right) \), the logarithm of the likelihood function (the joint probability density function, PDF) can be written as [2, 38]

$$\begin{aligned} \varvec{\Theta }&= \ln \left\{ {f\left( {\mathbf {x}\left( 1 \right) ,\mathbf {x}\left( 2 \right) , \ldots ,\mathbf {x}\left( L \right) } \right) } \right\} \nonumber \\&= const - L \cdot \ln \left\{ {\det \left\{ {{\mathbf {R}_x}} \right\} } \right\} \nonumber \\&-\sum \limits _{t = 1}^L {\mathbf {x}{{\left( t \right) }^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {x}\left( t \right) }\nonumber \\&= const - L \cdot \ln \left\{ {\det \left\{ {{\mathbf {R}_x}} \right\} } \right\} \nonumber \\&- L \cdot tr\left\{ {\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}{{\widehat{\mathbf {R}}}_x}} \right\} \end{aligned}$$
(65)

where the estimate of auto-correlation covariance \({\widehat{\mathbf {R}}_x}\) is given by

$$\begin{aligned} {\widehat{\mathbf {R}}_x} = \frac{1}{L}\sum \limits _{l = 1}^L {\mathbf {x}\left( l \right) \mathbf {x}{{\left( l \right) }^H}}. \end{aligned}$$
(66)

The unknown parameter vector of \({\mathbf {R}_x}\) is defined as

$$\begin{aligned} \varvec{\eta }&= {\left[ {{\varvec{\alpha } ^T},{\varvec{\beta } ^T},{\varvec{\mu } ^T},{\varvec{\nu } ^T},{\varvec{\kappa } ^T},{\varvec{\varsigma } ^T}} \right] ^T} \nonumber \\ \varvec{\alpha }&= \left[ {{\alpha _{11}}, \ldots ,{\alpha _{1{L_1}}}, \ldots ,{\alpha _{P_1}}, \ldots ,{\alpha _{P{L_P}}},} \right. \nonumber \\&\,{\left. {{\alpha _{{K_c} + 1}}, \ldots ,{\alpha _K}} \right] ^T} \nonumber \\ \varvec{\beta }&= \left[ {{\beta _{11}}, \ldots ,{\beta _{1{L_1}}}, \ldots ,{\beta _{P_1}}, \ldots ,{\beta _{P{L_P}}},} \right. \nonumber \\&\,{\left. {{\beta _{{K_c} + 1}}, \ldots ,{\beta _K}} \right] ^T} \end{aligned}$$
(67)

In order to obtain the unique CRB of \({\varvec{\rho } _k}\), the fading coefficient of the signal in the pth group is normalized to unity. For the sake of simplify, \({\alpha _{p1}}\) is assumed to be the smallest DOA in the pth group in the following derivation. \(\varvec{\mu } = {\left[ {{\mu _{12}}, \ldots ,{\mu _{1{L_1}}}, \ldots ,{\mu _{P_2}}, \ldots ,{\mu _{P{L_P}}}} \right] ^T}\) and \(\varvec{\nu } = {\left[ {{\nu _{12}}, \ldots ,{\nu _{1{L_1}}}, \ldots ,{\nu _{P_2}}, \ldots ,{\nu _{P{L_P}}}} \right] ^T}\) are defined as the real part and \(\varvec{\varpi } = {\left[ {{\varvec{\rho } _1}{{\left( {2:{P_1}} \right) }^T}, \ldots ,{\varvec{\rho } _D}{{\left( {2:{P_D}} \right) }^T}} \right] ^T}\) is defined as the imaginary part, respectively. \(\varvec{\kappa } \) and \(\varvec{\varsigma } \) are defined as the real part and imaginary part of \({\mathbf {c}_1}\), respectively. The kth element in a vector, for example, \(\varvec{\eta } \) is defined as \({\eta _k}\). Then the general expression of the \(\left( {m,n} \right) \)th element in Fisher information matrix (FIM) can be expressed as

$$\begin{aligned} {\mathbf {F}_{{\eta _m}{\eta _n}}} = - E\left\{ {\frac{{{\partial ^2}\varTheta }}{{\partial {\eta _m}\partial {\eta _n}}}} \right\} \end{aligned}$$
(68)

Based on the relationship

$$\begin{aligned}&\frac{{\partial \mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}}}{{\partial {\eta _m}}} = - \mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\frac{{\partial {\mathbf {R}_x}}}{{\partial {\eta _m}}}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\end{aligned}$$
(69)
$$\begin{aligned}&\frac{{\partial \ln \left\{ {\det \left\{ {{\mathbf {R}_x}} \right\} } \right\} }}{{\partial {\eta _m}}} = tr\left\{ {\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\frac{{\partial {\mathbf {R}_x}}}{{\partial {\eta _m}}}} \right\} \end{aligned}$$
(70)

the first derivative of \(\varTheta \) is obtained

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{{\partial \varTheta }}{{\partial {\eta _m}}}&= - Ltr\left\{ {\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\frac{{\partial {\mathbf {R}_x}}}{{\partial {\eta _m}}}} \right\} \nonumber \\&+\,Ltr\left\{ {\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\frac{{\partial {\mathbf {R}_x}}}{{\partial {\eta _m}}}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}{{\widehat{\mathbf {R}}}_x}} \right\} \nonumber \\&= Ltr\left\{ {\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\frac{{\partial {\mathbf {R}_x}}}{{\partial {\eta _m}}}\left( {\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}{{\widehat{\mathbf {R}}}_x} - \mathbf {I}} \right) } \right\} . \end{aligned}$$
(71)

The second derivative of \(\varTheta \) is given by

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{{\partial \varTheta }}{{\partial {\eta _m}{\eta _n}}}&= Ltr\left\{ {\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\frac{{\partial {\mathbf {R}_x}}}{{\partial {\eta _m}}}\left( {\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}{{\widehat{\mathbf {R}}}_x} - \mathbf {I}} \right) } \right\} \nonumber \\&= Ltr\left\{ {\left( {{{\partial \left( {\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\frac{{\partial {\mathbf {R}_x}}}{{\partial {\eta _m}}}} \right) } \Big / {\partial {\eta _n}}}} \right) \left( {\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}{{\widehat{\mathbf {R}}}_x} - \mathbf {I}} \right) } \right\} \nonumber \\&+\,Ltr\left\{ {\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\frac{{\partial {\mathbf {R}_x}}}{{\partial {\eta _m}}}\frac{{\partial \left( {\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}{{\widehat{\mathbf {R}}}_x} - \mathbf {I}} \right) }}{{\partial {\eta _n}}}} \right\} \nonumber \\&= Ltr\left\{ {\left( {{{\partial \left( {\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\frac{{\partial {\mathbf {R}_x}}}{{\partial {\eta _m}}}} \right) } \Big / {\partial {\eta _n}}}} \right) \left( {\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}{{\widehat{\mathbf {R}}}_x} - \mathbf {I}} \right) } \right\} \nonumber \\&-\,Ltr\left\{ {\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\frac{{\partial {\mathbf {R}_x}}}{{\partial {\eta _m}}}\left( {\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\frac{{\partial {\mathbf {R}_x}}}{{\partial {\eta _n}}}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}{{\widehat{\mathbf {R}}}_x}} \right) } \right\} . \end{aligned}$$
(72)

Due to \(E\left\{ {{{\widehat{\mathbf {R}}}_x}} \right\} = {\mathbf {R}_x}\), the expectation of both sides of (70) is taken, we have

$$\begin{aligned} {\mathbf {F}_{{\eta _m}{\eta _n}}} = Ltr\left\{ {\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\frac{{\partial {\mathbf {R}_x}}}{{\partial {\eta _m}}}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\frac{{\partial {\mathbf {R}_x}}}{{\partial {\eta _n}}}} \right\} . \end{aligned}$$
(73)

In the subsequent derivation process, the FIM expression of mixed signals is derived. The notation \({\widetilde{\mathbf {R}}_{{\eta _m}}}\) defines \({{\partial \mathbf {R}} / {\partial {\eta _m}}}\).

1.1 Derivatives with respect to DOA

Based on the expression of covariance matrix (64), the partial derivative of \({\mathbf {R}_x}\) with respect to the mth element \({\alpha _m}\) of \(\varvec{\alpha } \) can be written as

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{{\partial {\mathbf {R}_x}}}{{\partial {\alpha _m}}}&= \mathbf {C}{\widetilde{\mathbf {A}}_{{\alpha _m}}}\mathbf {E}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H} \nonumber \\&+\,\mathbf {CAE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}\widetilde{\mathbf {A}}_{{\alpha _m}}^H{\mathbf {C}^H}. \end{aligned}$$
(74)

Based on \(tr\left\{ {\mathbf {R} + {\mathbf {R}^H}} \right\} = 2\mathrm{Re} \left\{ {tr\left\{ \mathbf {R} \right\} } \right\} \), we have

$$\begin{aligned} {\mathbf {F}_{{\alpha _m}{\alpha _n}}}&= Ltr\left\{ {\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\frac{{\partial {\mathbf {R}_x}}}{{\partial {\alpha _m}}}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\frac{{\partial {\mathbf {R}_x}}}{{\partial {\alpha _n}}}} \right\} \nonumber \\&= Ltr\left\{ {\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\left( {\mathbf {C}{{\widetilde{\mathbf {A}}}_{{\alpha _m}}}\mathbf {E}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H} } \right. } \right. \nonumber \\&\left. +\,{\mathbf {CAE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}\widetilde{\mathbf {A}}_{{\alpha _m}}^H{\mathbf {C}^H}} \right) \times \mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1} \nonumber \\&\left( {\mathbf {C}{{\widetilde{\mathbf {A}}}_{{\alpha _n}}}\mathbf {E}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H} } \right. \nonumber \\&\left. {\left. +\, {\mathbf {CAE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}\widetilde{\mathbf {A}}_{{\alpha _n}}^H{\mathbf {C}^H}} \right) } \right\} \nonumber \\&= 2L\mathrm{Re} \left\{ {tr\left\{ {\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}C{{\widetilde{\mathbf {A}}}_{{\alpha _m}}}\mathbf {E}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H} } \right. } \right. \nonumber \\&\times \, {\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{\widetilde{\mathbf {A}}_{{\alpha _n}}}\mathbf {E}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H} \nonumber \\&+\,\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {CAE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}\widetilde{\mathbf {A}}_{{\alpha _m}}^H \nonumber \\&\left. {\left. \times \,{ {\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{{\widetilde{\mathbf {A}}}_{{\alpha _n}}}\mathbf {E}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H}} \right\} } \right\} \end{aligned}$$
(75)

Since only the mth column of \({\widetilde{\mathbf {A}}_{{\alpha _m}}}\) is nonzero, then \({\widetilde{\mathbf {A}}_{{\alpha _m}}}\) can be represented as \({\widetilde{\mathbf {A}}_{{\alpha _m}}} = {\mathbf {A}_\alpha }\varvec{\gamma } _K^m{\left( {\varvec{\gamma } _K^m} \right) ^T}\), where the mth column of the identity matrix is defined as \(\varvec{\gamma } _K^m\). \({\mathbf {A}_ {\varvec{\alpha }} }\) is the derivative matrix of the array manifold matrix, which is expressed as

$$\begin{aligned} {\mathbf {A}_ {\varvec{\alpha }} }&= \left[ {\frac{{d\mathbf {a}\left( {{\alpha _{11}}} \right) }}{{d{\alpha _{11}}}}, \ldots ,\frac{{d\mathbf {a}\left( {{\alpha _{1{P_1}}}} \right) }}{{d{\alpha _{1{P_1}}}}}, \ldots ,\frac{{d\mathbf {a}\left( {{\alpha _{D1}}} \right) }}{{d{\alpha _{D1}}}},} \right. \nonumber \\&{\left. { \ldots ,\frac{{d\mathbf {a}\left( {{\alpha _{D{P_D}}}} \right) }}{{d{\alpha _{D{P_D}}}}},\frac{{d\mathbf {a}\left( {{\alpha _{{K_c} + 1}}} \right) }}{{d{\alpha _{{K_c} + 1}}}}, \ldots ,\frac{{d\mathbf {a}\left( {{\alpha _K}} \right) }}{{d{\alpha _K}}}} \right] ^T} \end{aligned}$$
(76)

Then (73) can be written as

$$\begin{aligned} {\mathbf {F}_{{\alpha _m}{\alpha _n}}}&= 2L\mathrm{Re} \left\{ {tr} \right. \left\{ {\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{\mathbf {A}_ {\varvec{\alpha }} }\varvec{\gamma } _K^m{{\left( {\varvec{\gamma } _K^m} \right) }^T}\mathbf {E}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}} \right. \nonumber \\&\times \,{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{\mathbf {A}_ {\varvec{\alpha }} }\varvec{\gamma } _K^n{\left( {\varvec{\gamma } _K^n} \right) ^T}\mathbf {E}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H} \nonumber \\&+\, \mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {CAE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}\varvec{\gamma } _K^m{\left( {\varvec{\gamma } _K^m} \right) ^T}\mathbf {A}_ {\varvec{\alpha }} ^H \times \nonumber \\&\left. {\left. {{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{\mathbf {A}_ {\varvec{\alpha }} }\varvec{\gamma } _K^n{{\left( {\varvec{\gamma } _K^n} \right) }^T}\mathbf {E}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H}} \right\} } \right\} \nonumber \\&= 2L\mathrm{Re} \left\{ {\left( {{{\left( {\varvec{\gamma } _K^m} \right) }^T}\mathbf {E}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{\mathbf {A}_ {\varvec{\alpha }} }\varvec{\gamma } _K^n} \right) } \right. \nonumber \\&\times \,\left( {{{\left( {\varvec{\gamma } _K^n} \right) }^T}\mathbf {E}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{\mathbf {A}_ {\varvec{\alpha }} }\varvec{\gamma } _K^m} \right) \nonumber \\&+ \left( {{{\left( {\varvec{\gamma } _K^m} \right) }^T}\mathbf {A}_ {\varvec{\alpha }} ^H{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{\mathbf {A}_ {\varvec{\alpha }} }\varvec{\gamma } _K^n} \right) \times \nonumber \\&\left. {\left( {{{\left( {\varvec{\gamma } _K^n} \right) }^T}\mathbf {E}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {CAE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}\varvec{\gamma } _K^m} \right) } \right\} \nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$
(77)

Then the FIM that corresponds to \(\varvec{\alpha } \) can be expressed as

$$\begin{aligned} {\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\alpha \alpha } }}&= 2L\mathrm{Re} \left\{ {\left( {\mathbf {E}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{\mathbf {A}_ {\varvec{\alpha }} }} \right) } \right. \nonumber \\&\odot \,{\left( {\mathbf {E}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{\mathbf {A}_ {\varvec{\alpha }} }} \right) ^T} \nonumber \\&+ \left( {\mathbf {A}_ {\varvec{\alpha }} ^H{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{\mathbf {A}_ {\varvec{\alpha }} }} \right) \nonumber \\&\odot \,\left. {{{\left( {\mathbf {E}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {CAE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}} \right) }^T}} \right\} \end{aligned}$$
(78)

where \( \odot \) denotes the Hadamard product. Similarly, the FIM that corresponds to \(\varvec{\beta } \) can be expressed as

$$\begin{aligned} {\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\beta \beta } }}&= 2L\mathrm{Re} \left\{ {\left( {\mathbf {E}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{\mathbf {A}_{\varvec{\beta }} }} \right) } \right. \nonumber \\&\odot \,{\left( {\mathbf {E}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{\mathbf {A}_{\varvec{\beta }} }} \right) ^T} \nonumber \\&+\,\left( {\mathbf {A}_{\varvec{\beta }} ^H{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{\mathbf {A}_{\varvec{\beta }} }} \right) \nonumber \\&\odot \,\left. {{{\left( {\mathbf {E}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {CAE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}} \right) }^T}} \right\} \end{aligned}$$
(79)

where

$$\begin{aligned} {\mathbf {A}_{\varvec{\alpha }} }&= \left[ {\frac{{d\mathbf {a}\left( {{\beta _{11}}} \right) }}{{d{\beta _{11}}}}, \ldots ,\frac{{d\mathbf {a}\left( {{\beta _{1{P_1}}}} \right) }}{{d{\beta _{1{P_1}}}}}, \ldots ,\frac{{d\mathbf {a}\left( {{\beta _{D1}}} \right) }}{{d{\beta _{D1}}}},} \right. \nonumber \\&{\left. { \ldots ,\frac{{d\mathbf {a}\left( {{\beta _{D{P_D}}}} \right) }}{{d{\beta _{D{P_D}}}}},\frac{{d\mathbf {a}\left( {{\beta _{{K_c} + 1}}} \right) }}{{d{\beta _{{K_c} + 1}}}}, \ldots ,\frac{{d\mathbf {a}\left( {{\beta _K}} \right) }}{{d{\beta _K}}}} \right] ^T}\!.\nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$
(80)

The FIM that corresponds to the cross terms between \(\varvec{\alpha } \) and \(\varvec{\beta } \) is

$$\begin{aligned} {\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\alpha \beta } }}&= 2L\mathrm{Re} \left\{ {\left( {\mathbf {E}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{\mathbf {A}_{\varvec{\beta }} }} \right) } \right. \nonumber \\&\odot \,{\left( {\mathbf {E}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{\mathbf {A}_{\varvec{\alpha }} }} \right) ^T} \nonumber \\&+ \left( {\mathbf {A}_{\varvec{\alpha }} ^H{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{\mathbf {A}_{\varvec{\beta }} }} \right) \nonumber \\&\odot \,\left. {{{\left( {\mathbf {E}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {CAE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}} \right) }^T}} \right\} \end{aligned}$$
(81)

1.2 Derivatives with respect to fading coefficients

\({\overline{\mathbf {A}} _c} = \left[ {{\mathbf {A}_{c1}}\left( {1:N,2:{L_1}} \right) , \ldots ,\left. {{\mathbf {A}_{cD}}\left( {1:N,2:{L_P}} \right) } \right] } \right. \), and \(\overline{\varvec{\Gamma }} = blkdiag\left\{ {{\varvec{\rho } _1}\left( {2:{L_1}} \right) , \ldots ,{\varvec{\rho } _D}\left( {2:{L_P}} \right) } \right\} \). The matrix \({\varvec{\Psi } _\mathbf {r}} = blkdiag\left\{ {{\mathbf {1}_{\left( {{L_1} - 1} \right) \times 1}}, \ldots ,{\mathbf {1}_{\left( {{L_P} - 1} \right) \times 1}}} \right\} \) and \({\varvec{\Psi } _\mathbf {i}} = blkdiag\left\{ {{\mathbf {j}_{\left( {{L_1} - 1} \right) \times 1}}, \ldots ,{\mathbf {j}_{\left( {{L_P} - 1} \right) \times 1}}} \right\} \), where all the elements of the vector \(\mathbf {1}\) are equal to 1 and all the elements of the vector \(\mathbf {j}\) are equal to the imaginary unit \(j\). According to (73), the \(\left( {{r_m},{r_n}} \right) \)th element of the FIM with respect to fading coefficients can be expressed as

$$\begin{aligned} {\mathbf {F}_{{\mu _m}{\mu _n}}}&= Ltr\left\{ {\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\frac{{\partial {\mathbf {R}_x}}}{{\partial {\mu _m}}}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\frac{{\partial {\mathbf {R}_x}}}{{\partial {\mu _n}}}} \right\} \nonumber \\&= Ltr\left\{ {\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\left( {\mathbf {CA}{{\widetilde{\mathbf {E}}}_{{\mu _m}}}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H} } \right. } \right. \nonumber \\&+\,\left. {\mathbf {CAE}{\mathbf {R}_s}\mathbf {E}_{{\mu _m}}^H{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H}} \right) \nonumber \\&\times \, \mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\left( {\mathbf {CA}{{\widetilde{\mathbf {E}}}_{{\mu _n}}}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H} } \right. \nonumber \\&+\left. {\left. {\mathbf {CAE}{\mathbf {R}_s}\mathbf {E}_{{\mu _n}}^H{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H}} \right) } \right\} \nonumber \\&= Ltr\left\{ {\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\left( {\mathbf {C}{{\overline{\mathbf {A}}_c}{{\widetilde{\overline{\varvec{\Gamma }}} }}_{{\mu _m}}}{\mathbf {R}_{cs}}{\varvec{\Gamma } ^H}\mathbf {A}_c^H{\mathbf {C}^H}} \right. } \right. \nonumber \\&+ \left. {\mathbf {C}{\mathbf {A}_c}\varvec{\Gamma } {\mathbf {R}_{cs}}{\widetilde{\overline{\varvec{\Gamma }}}}_{ {\mu _m}}^H\overline{\mathbf {A}} _c^H{\mathbf {C}^H}} \right) \nonumber \\&\times \, \mathbf {R}_x^{- 1}\left( {\mathbf {C}{{\overline{\mathbf {A}}}}_c} {{\widetilde{\overline{\varvec{\Gamma }}} }}_{{\mu _n}} {\mathbf {R}_{cs}}{\varvec{\Gamma } ^H}\mathbf {A}_c^H{\mathbf {C}^H} \right. \nonumber \\&+ \,\left. {\left. {\mathbf {C}{\mathbf {A}_c}\varvec{\Gamma } {\mathbf {R}_{cs}}\widetilde{\overline{\varvec{\Gamma }}}_{{\mu _n}}^H\overline{\mathbf {A}} _c^H{\mathbf {C}^H}} \right) } \right\} \nonumber \\&= 2L\mathrm{Re} \left\{ {tr\left\{ {\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{{\overline{\mathbf {A}} }_c}{{\widetilde{\overline{\varvec{\Gamma }}}}_{{\mu _m}}}{\mathbf {R}_{cs}}{\varvec{\Gamma } ^H}\mathbf {A}_c^H } \right. } \right. \nonumber \\&\times \,{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{\overline{\mathbf {A}} _c}{\widetilde{\overline{\varvec{\Gamma }}}_{{\mu _n}}}{\mathbf {R}_{cs}}{\varvec{\Gamma } ^H}\mathbf {A}_c^H{\mathbf {C}^H} \nonumber \\&+\,\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{\mathbf {A}_c}\varvec{\Gamma } {\mathbf {R}_{cs}}\widetilde{\overline{\varvec{\Gamma }}}_{{\mu _m}}^H\overline{\mathbf {A}} _c^H \nonumber \\&\left. {\left. {{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{{\overline{\mathbf {A}} }_c}{{\widetilde{\overline{\varvec{\Gamma }}}}_{{\mu _n}}}{\mathbf {R}_{cs}}{\varvec{\Gamma } ^H}\mathbf {A}_c^H{\mathbf {C}^H}} \right\} } \right\} \end{aligned}$$
(82)

Based on \({\overline{\varvec{\Gamma }}}_{{\mu _m}} = {\varvec{\upgamma }} _{{K_c} - P}^m{\left( {\varvec{\upgamma } _{{K_c} - P}^m} \right) ^T}{\varvec{\Psi } _\mathbf {r}}\), the real part of fading coefficients of the FIM can be represented as

$$\begin{aligned} {F_{\mu \mu }}&= 2L\mathrm{Re} \left\{ {\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{{\overline{\mathbf {A}} }_c}{\widetilde{\overline{\varvec{\Gamma }}}}_{\mu _m}}{\mathbf {R}_{cs}}{\varvec{\Gamma } ^H}\mathbf {A}_c^H \right. \nonumber \\&\times \,{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{\overline{\mathbf {A}} _c}{\widetilde{\overline{\varvec{\Gamma }}}_{{\mu _n}}}{\mathbf {R}_{cs}}{\varvec{\Gamma } ^H}\mathbf {A}_c^H{\mathbf {C}^H} \nonumber \\&+\,\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{\mathbf {A}_c}\varvec{\Gamma } {\mathbf {R}_{cs}}\widetilde{\overline{\varvec{\Gamma }}}_{{\mu _m}}^H\overline{\mathbf {A}} _c^H \nonumber \\&\times \, \left. {{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{{\overline{\mathbf {A}} }_c}{{\widetilde{\overline{\varvec{\Gamma }}}}_{{\mu _n}}}{\mathbf {R}_{cs}}{\varvec{\Gamma } ^H}\mathbf {A}_c^H{\mathbf {C}^H}} \right\} \nonumber \\&= 2L\mathrm{Re} \left\{ {\left( {{\varvec{\Psi } _\mathbf {r}}{\mathbf {R}_{cs}}{\varvec{\Gamma } ^H}\mathbf {A}_c^H{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{{\overline{\mathbf {A}} }_c}} \right) } \right. \nonumber \\&\odot \,{\left( {{\varvec{\Psi } _\mathbf {r}}{\mathbf {R}_{cs}}{\varvec{\Gamma } ^H}\mathbf {A}_c^H{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{{\overline{\mathbf {A}} }_c}} \right) ^T} \nonumber \\&+\,\left( {\overline{\mathbf {A}} _c^H{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{{\overline{\mathbf {A}} }_c}} \right) \nonumber \\&\odot \left. {{{\left( {{\varvec{\Psi } _\mathbf {r}}{\mathbf {R}_{cs}}{\varvec{\Gamma } ^H}\mathbf {A}_c^H{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{\mathbf {A}_c}\varvec{\Gamma } {\mathbf {R}_{cs}}\varvec{\Psi } _\mathbf {r}^H} \right) }^T}} \right\} \end{aligned}$$
(83)

Based on \({\overline{\varvec{\Gamma }} _{{\nu _m}}} = \varvec{\gamma } _{{K_c} - P}^m{\left( {\varvec{\gamma } _{{K_c} - P}^m} \right) ^T}{\varvec{\Psi } _\mathbf {i}}\), the imaginary part of fading coefficients of the FIM can be represented as

$$\begin{aligned} {\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\nu \nu } }}&= 2L\mathrm{Re} \left\{ {\left( {{\varvec{\Psi } _\mathbf {i}}{\mathbf {R}_{cs}}{\varvec{\Gamma } ^H}\mathbf {A}_c^H{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{{\overline{\mathbf {A}} }_c}} \right) } \right. \nonumber \\&\odot \,{\left( {{\varvec{\Psi } _\mathbf {i}}{\mathbf {R}_{cs}}{\varvec{\Gamma } ^H}\mathbf {A}_c^H{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{{\overline{\mathbf {A}} }_c}} \right) ^T} \nonumber \\&+\left( {\overline{\mathbf {A}} _c^H{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{{\overline{\mathbf {A}} }_c}} \right) \nonumber \\&\odot \,\left. {{{\left( {{\varvec{\Psi } _\mathbf {i}}{\mathbf {R}_{cs}}{\varvec{\Gamma } ^H}\mathbf {A}_c^H{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{\mathbf {A}_c}\varvec{\Gamma } {\mathbf {R}_{cs}}\varvec{\Psi } _\mathbf {i}^H} \right) }^T}} \right\} \end{aligned}$$
(84)

The FIM that corresponds to the cross terms between \(\varvec{\mu } \) and \(\varvec{\nu }\) is

$$\begin{aligned} {\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\mu \nu } }}&= 2L\mathrm{Re} \left\{ {\left( {{\varvec{\Psi } _\mathbf {r}}{\mathbf {R}_{cs}}{\varvec{\Gamma } ^H}\mathbf {A}_c^H{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{{\overline{\mathbf {A}} }_c}} \right) } \right. \nonumber \\&\odot \,{\left( {{\varvec{\Psi } _\mathbf {i}}{\mathbf {R}_{cs}}{\varvec{\Gamma } ^H}\mathbf {A}_c^H{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{{\overline{\mathbf {A}} }_c}} \right) ^T} \nonumber \\&+\left( {\overline{\mathbf {A}} _c^H{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{{\overline{\mathbf {A}} }_c}} \right) \nonumber \\&\odot \,\left. {{{\left( {{\varvec{\Psi } _\mathbf {i}}{\mathbf {R}_{cs}}{\varvec{\Gamma } ^H}\mathbf {A}_c^H{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{\mathbf {A}_c}\varvec{\Gamma } {\mathbf {R}_{cs}}\varvec{\Psi } _\mathbf {r}^H} \right) }^T}} \right\} \end{aligned}$$
(85)

1.3 Derivatives with respect to mutual coupling coefficients

Based on (73), the mth and nth element of \({\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\kappa \kappa } }} \), \({\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\varsigma } \varvec{\varsigma } }} \) and \({\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\kappa \varsigma } }} \) can be given respectively as follows

$$\begin{aligned} {\mathbf {F}_{{\varvec{\kappa } _m}{\varvec{\kappa } _n}}}&= 2L\mathrm{Re} \left\{ {tr\left\{ {\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}{{\widetilde{\mathbf {C}}}_{{\varvec{\kappa } _m}}}\mathbf {AE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}} \right. } \right. \nonumber \\&\times \, {\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}{\widetilde{\mathbf {C}}_{{\varvec{\kappa } _n}}}\mathbf {AE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H} \nonumber \\&+\,\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}{\widetilde{\mathbf {C}}_{{\varvec{\kappa } _m}}}\mathbf {AE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H} \nonumber \\&\times \, \left. {\left. {{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {CAE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}\mathbf {C}_{{\varvec{\kappa } _n}}^H} \right\} } \right\} \end{aligned}$$
(86)
$$\begin{aligned} {\mathbf {F}_{{\varvec{\varsigma } _m}{\varvec{\varsigma } _n}}}&= 2L\mathrm{Re} \left\{ {tr\left\{ {\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}{{\widetilde{\mathbf {C}}}_{{\varvec{\varsigma } _m}}}\mathbf {AE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}} \right. } \right. \nonumber \\&\times \, {\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}{\widetilde{\mathbf {C}}_{{\varvec{\varsigma } _n}}}\mathbf {AE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H} \nonumber \\&+\,\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}{\widetilde{\mathbf {C}}_{{\varvec{\varsigma } _m}}}\mathbf {AE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H} \nonumber \\&\times \, \left. {\left. {{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {CAE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}\mathbf {C}_{{\varvec{\varsigma } _n}}^H} \right\} } \right\} \end{aligned}$$
(87)
$$\begin{aligned} {\mathbf {F}_{{\varvec{\kappa } _m}{\varvec{\varsigma } _n}}}&= 2L\mathrm{Re} \left\{ {tr\left\{ {\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}{{\widetilde{\mathbf {C}}}_{{\varvec{\kappa } _m}}}\mathbf {AE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}} \right. } \right. \nonumber \\&\times \,{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}{\widetilde{\mathbf {C}}_{{\varvec{\varsigma } _n}}}\mathbf {AE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H} \nonumber \\&+\,\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}{\widetilde{\mathbf {C}}_{{\varvec{\kappa } _m}}}\mathbf {AE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H} \nonumber \\&\times \,\left. {\left. {{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {CAE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}\mathbf {C}_{{\varvec{\varsigma } _n}}^H} \right\} } \right\} \end{aligned}$$
(88)

where

$$\begin{aligned} {\widetilde{\mathbf {C}}_{{\varvec{\kappa } _m}}}&= toeplitz\left\{ {\left[ {0,{{\left( {\varvec{\gamma } _{{M_0}}^m} \right) }^T},{\mathbf {0}_{1,\left( {M - {M_0} - 1} \right) }}} \right] } \right\} , \nonumber \\ m&= 1, \ldots ,{M_0}. \end{aligned}$$
(89)

\(toeplitz\left\{ \mathbf {z} \right\} \) stands for the symmetric Toeplitz matrix constructed by the vector \(\mathbf {z}\).

1.4 DOA-fading coefficients cross terms

$$\begin{aligned} {\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\alpha \mu } }}&= 2L\mathrm{Re} \left\{ {\left( {\mathbf {E}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{{\overline{\mathbf {A}} }_c}} \right) } \right. \nonumber \\&\odot \,{\left( {{\varvec{\Psi } _\mathbf {r}}{\mathbf {R}_{cs}}{\varvec{\Gamma } ^H}\mathbf {A}_c^H{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{\mathbf {A}_{\varvec{\alpha }} }} \right) ^T} \nonumber \\&+\,\left( {\mathbf {A}_{\varvec{\alpha }} ^H{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{{\overline{\mathbf {A}} }_c}} \right) \nonumber \\&\odot \left. {{{\left( {{\varvec{\Psi } _\mathbf {r}}{\mathbf {R}_{cs}}{\varvec{\Gamma } ^H}\mathbf {A}_c^H{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {CAE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}} \right) }^T}} \right\} \end{aligned}$$
(90)
$$\begin{aligned} {\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\alpha \nu } }}&= 2L\mathrm{Re} \left\{ {\left( {\mathbf {E}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{{\overline{\mathbf {A}} }_c}} \right) } \right. \nonumber \\&\odot {\left( {{\varvec{\Psi } _\mathbf {i}}{\mathbf {R}_{cs}}{\varvec{\Gamma } ^H}\mathbf {A}_c^H{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{\mathbf {A}_{\varvec{\alpha }} }} \right) ^T} \nonumber \\&+\,\left( {\mathbf {A}_{\varvec{\alpha }} ^H{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{{\overline{\mathbf {A}} }_c}} \right) \nonumber \\&\odot \left. {{{\left( {{\varvec{\Psi } _\mathbf {i}}{\mathbf {R}_{cs}}{\varvec{\Gamma } ^H}\mathbf {A}_c^H{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {CAE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}} \right) }^T}} \right\} \end{aligned}$$
(91)
$$\begin{aligned} {\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\beta \mu } }}&= 2L\mathrm{Re} \left\{ {\left( {\mathbf {E}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{{\overline{\mathbf {A}} }_c}} \right) } \right. \nonumber \\&\odot \,{\left( {{\varvec{\Psi } _\mathbf {r}}{\mathbf {R}_{cs}}{\varvec{\Gamma } ^H}\mathbf {A}_c^H{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{\mathbf {A}_{\varvec{\beta } }}} \right) ^T} \nonumber \\&+\,\left( {\mathbf {A}_{\varvec{\beta }} ^H{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{{\overline{\mathbf {A}} }_c}} \right) \nonumber \\&\odot \,\left. {{{\left( {{\varvec{\Psi } _\mathbf {r}}{\mathbf {R}_{cs}}{\varvec{\Gamma } ^H}\mathbf {A}_c^H{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {CAE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}} \right) }^T}} \right\} \end{aligned}$$
(92)
$$\begin{aligned} {\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\beta \nu }}}&= 2L\mathrm{Re} \left\{ {\left( {\mathbf {E}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{{\overline{\mathbf {A}} }_c}} \right) } \right. \nonumber \\&\odot \,{\left( {{\varvec{\Psi } _\mathbf {i}}{\mathbf {R}_{cs}}{\varvec{\Gamma } ^H}\mathbf {A}_c^H{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{\mathbf {A}_{\varvec{\beta }} }} \right) ^T} \nonumber \\&+\left( {\mathbf {A}_{\varvec{\beta }} ^H{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{{\overline{\mathbf {A}} }_c}} \right) \nonumber \\&\odot \,\left. {{{\left( {{\varvec{\Psi } _\mathbf {i}}{\mathbf {R}_{cs}}{\varvec{\Gamma } ^H}\mathbf {A}_c^H{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {CAE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}} \right) }^T}} \right\} \end{aligned}$$
(93)

1.5 DOA-mutual coupling coefficients cross terms

$$\begin{aligned} {\mathbf {F}_{{\varvec{\alpha }} {\kappa _n}}}&= 2L\mathrm{Re} \left\{ {diag\left( {\mathbf {E}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}{{\widetilde{\mathbf {C}}}_{{\varvec{\kappa } _n}}}} \right. } \right. \nonumber \\&\times \,\left. {\mathbf {AE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{\mathbf {A}_{\varvec{\alpha }} }} \right) \nonumber \\&+\,diag\left( {\mathbf {E}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}} \right. \nonumber \\&\times \, \left. {\left. {\mathbf {AE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}\widetilde{\mathbf {C}}_{{\varvec{\kappa } _n}}^H\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{\mathbf {A}_{\varvec{\alpha }} }} \right) } \right\} \end{aligned}$$
(94)
$$\begin{aligned} {\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\alpha } {\varvec{\varsigma } _n}}}&= 2L\mathrm{Re} \left\{ {diag\left( {\mathbf {E}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}{{\widetilde{\mathbf {C}}}_{{\varvec{\varsigma } _n}}}} \right. } \right. \nonumber \\&\times \, \left. {\mathbf {AE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{\mathbf {A}_{\varvec{\alpha }} }} \right) \nonumber \\&+\,\,diag\left( {\mathbf {E}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}} \right. \nonumber \\&\times \, \left. {\left. {\mathbf {AE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}\widetilde{\mathbf {C}}_{{\varvec{\varsigma } _n}}^H\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{\mathbf {A}_{\varvec{\alpha }} }} \right) } \right\} \end{aligned}$$
(95)
$$\begin{aligned} {\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\beta } {\varvec{\kappa } _n}}}&= 2L\mathrm{Re}\left\{ {diag} \right. \left( {\mathbf {E}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}{{\widetilde{\mathbf {C}}}_{{\varvec{\kappa } _n}}}} \right. \nonumber \\&\times \, \left. {\mathbf {AE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{\mathbf {A}_{\varvec{\beta }} }} \right) \nonumber \\&+\,\,diag \left( {\mathbf {E}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C} \times } \right. \nonumber \\&\left. {\left. {\mathbf {AE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}\widetilde{\mathbf {C}}_{{\varvec{\kappa } _n}}^H\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{\mathbf {A}_{\varvec{\beta }} }} \right) } \right\} \end{aligned}$$
(96)
$$\begin{aligned} {\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\beta } {\varvec{\varsigma } _n}}}&= 2L\mathrm{Re} \left\{ {diag} \right. \left( {\mathbf {E}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}{{\widetilde{\mathbf {C}}}_{{\varvec{\varsigma } _n}}}} \right. \nonumber \\&\times \, \left. {\mathbf {AE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{\mathbf {A}_{\varvec{\beta }} }} \right) \nonumber \\&+\,\,diag\left( {\mathbf {E}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}} \right. \nonumber \\&\times \, \left. {\left. {\mathbf {AE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}\widetilde{\mathbf {C}}_{{\varvec{\varsigma } _n}}^H\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{\mathbf {A}_{\varvec{\beta }} }} \right) } \right\} \end{aligned}$$
(97)

where \(diag\left( \mathbf {A} \right) \) is a column vector constructed by the main diagonal elements of matrix \(\mathbf {A}\).

1.6 Fading coefficients-mutual coupling coefficients cross terms

$$\begin{aligned} {\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\mu } {\varvec{\kappa } _n}}}&= 2L\mathrm{Re} \left\{ {diag} \right. \left( {{\varvec{\Psi } _\mathbf {r}}{\mathbf {R}_{cs}}{\varvec{\Gamma } ^H}\mathbf {A}_c^H{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}} \right. \nonumber \\&\times \left. {{\widetilde{\mathbf {C}}}_{{\varvec{\kappa } _n}}}{\mathbf {AE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{{\overline{\mathbf {A}} }_c}} \right) \nonumber \\&+diag\left( {{\varvec{\Psi } _\mathbf {r}}{\mathbf {R}_{cs}}{\varvec{\Gamma } ^H}\mathbf {A}_c^H{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}} \right. \nonumber \\&\times \left. {\left. {\mathbf {AE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}\widetilde{\mathbf {C}}_{{\varvec{\kappa } _n}}^H\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{{\overline{\mathbf {A}} }_c}} \right) } \right\} \end{aligned}$$
(98)
$$\begin{aligned} {\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\mu } {\varvec{\varsigma } _n}}}&= 2L\mathrm{Re} \left\{ {diag} \right. \left( {{\varvec{\Psi } _\mathbf {r}}{\mathbf {R}_{cs}}{\varvec{\Gamma } ^H}\mathbf {A}_c^H{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1} } \right. \nonumber \\&\times \left. {{{\widetilde{\mathbf {C}}}_{{\varvec{\varsigma } _n}}}\mathbf {AE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{{\overline{\mathbf {A}} }_c}} \right) \nonumber \\&+\,diag\left( {{\varvec{\Psi } _\mathbf {r}}{\mathbf {R}_{cs}}{\varvec{\Gamma } ^H}\mathbf {A}_c^H{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}} \right. \nonumber \\&\times \left. {\left. {\mathbf {AE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}\widetilde{\mathbf {C}}_{{\varvec{\varsigma } _n}}^H\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{{\overline{\mathbf {A}} }_c}} \right) } \right\} \end{aligned}$$
(99)
$$\begin{aligned} {F_{\nu {\kappa _n}}}&= 2L\mathrm{Re} \left\{ {diag} \right. \left( {{\varvec{\Psi } _\mathbf {i}}{\mathbf {R}_{cs}}{\varvec{\Gamma } ^H}\mathbf {A}_c^H{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}} \right. \nonumber \\&\times \left. {{{\widetilde{\mathbf {C}}}_{{\varvec{\kappa } _n}}}\mathbf {AE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{{\overline{\mathbf {A}} }_c}} \right) \nonumber \\&+\,diag\left( {{\varvec{\Psi } _\mathbf {i}}{\mathbf {R}_{cs}}{\varvec{\Gamma } ^H}\mathbf {A}_c^H{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1} } \right. \nonumber \\&\times \left. {\left. {\mathbf {CAE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}\widetilde{\mathbf {C}}_{{\varvec{\kappa } _n}}^H\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{{\overline{\mathbf {A}} }_c}} \right) } \right\} \end{aligned}$$
(100)
$$\begin{aligned} {\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\nu } {\varvec{\varsigma } _n}}}&= 2L\mathrm{Re}\left\{ {diag} \right. \left( {{\varvec{\Psi } _\mathbf {i}}{\mathbf {R}_{cs}}{\varvec{\Gamma } ^H}\mathbf {A}_c^H{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}} \right. \nonumber \\&\times {\widetilde{\mathbf {C}}_{{\varvec{\varsigma } _n}}}\mathbf {AE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{\overline{\mathbf {A}} _c} \nonumber \\&+\,diag\left( {{\varvec{\Psi } _\mathbf {i}}{\mathbf {R}_{cs}}{\varvec{\Gamma } ^H}\mathbf {A}_c^H{\mathbf {C}^H}\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}} \right. \nonumber \\&\times \left. {\left. {\mathbf {AE}{\mathbf {R}_s}{\mathbf {E}^H}{\mathbf {A}^H}\widetilde{\mathbf {C}}_{{\varvec{\varsigma } _n}}^H\mathbf {R}_x^{ - 1}\mathbf {C}{{\overline{\mathbf {A}} }_c}} \right) } \right\} \end{aligned}$$
(101)

Based on the above formulations, the whole FIM can be expressed as

$$\begin{aligned} {\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\eta \eta }}}&= \left[ {\begin{array}{l@{\quad }l@{\quad }l@{\quad }l@{\quad }l@{\quad }l} {{\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\alpha \alpha } }}} &{} {{\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\alpha \beta } }}} &{} {{\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\alpha \mu } }}} &{} {{\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\alpha \nu } }}} &{} {{\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\alpha \kappa } }}} &{} {{\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\alpha \varsigma } }}} \\ {\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\alpha \beta } }^T} &{} {{\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\beta \beta } }}} &{} {{\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\beta \mu } }}} &{} {{\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\beta \nu } }}} &{} {{\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\beta \kappa } }}} &{} {{\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\beta \varsigma } }}} \\ {\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\alpha \mu } }^T} &{} {\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\beta \mu } }^T} &{} {{\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\mu \mu } }}} &{} {{\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\mu \nu } }}} &{} {{\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\mu \kappa } }}} &{} {{\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\mu \varsigma } }}} \\ {\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\alpha \nu } }^T} &{} {\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\beta \nu } }^T} &{} {\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\mu \nu } }^T} &{} {{\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\nu \nu } }}} &{} {{\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\nu \kappa } }}} &{} {{\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\nu \varsigma } }}} \\ {\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\alpha \kappa } }^T} &{} {\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\beta \kappa } }^T} &{} {\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\mu \kappa } }^T} &{} {\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\nu \kappa } }^T} &{} {{\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\kappa \kappa } }}} &{} {{\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\kappa \varsigma } }}} \\ {\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\alpha \varsigma } }^T} &{} {\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\beta \varsigma } }^T} &{} {\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\mu \varsigma } }^T} &{} {\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\nu \varsigma } }^T} &{} {\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\kappa \varsigma } }^T} &{} {{\mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\varsigma \varsigma } }}} \\ \end{array}} \right] \end{aligned}$$
(102)

Define \(\mathbf {H} = \mathbf {F}_{\varvec{\eta \eta } }^{ - 1}\), the CRBs of coherent signals, uncorrelated signals and mutual coupling coefficients can be given, respectively, as

$$\begin{aligned} CR{B_{{\Omega _c}}}&= \sqrt{\frac{1}{{2{K_c}}}\left( {\sum \limits _{k = 1}^{{K_c}} {{\mathbf {H}_{kk}}} + \sum \limits _{k = K + 1}^{K + {K_c}} {{\mathbf {H}_{kk}}} } \right) }\end{aligned}$$
(103)
$$\begin{aligned} CR{B_{{\Omega _u}}}&= \nonumber \\&\sqrt{\frac{1}{{2{K_c}}}\left( {\sum \limits _{k = {K_c} + 1}^K {{\mathbf {H}_{kk}}} + \sum \limits _{k = K + {K_c} + 1}^{2K} {{\mathbf {H}_{kk}}} } \right) }\end{aligned}$$
(104)
$$\begin{aligned} CR{B_c}&= \sqrt{\frac{1}{{\left\| {{\mathbf {c}_1}} \right\| }}\left( {\sum \limits _{k = 2\left( {K + {K_c} - P} \right) }^{2\left( {K + {K_c} - P + {M_0}} \right) } {{\mathbf {H}_{kk}}} } \right) } \end{aligned}$$
(105)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wan, L., Han, G., Rodrigues, J.J.P.C. et al. An energy efficient DOA estimation algorithm for uncorrelated and coherent signals in virtual MIMO systems. Telecommun Syst 59, 93–110 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-014-9886-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-014-9886-3

Keywords

Navigation