Skip to main content
Log in

Visual Acuity in Day for Night

  • Short Papers
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Vision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In film production, it is sometimes not convenient or directly impossible to shoot some night scenes at night. The film budget, schedule or location may not allow it. In these cases, the scenes are shot at daytime, and the ‘night look’ is achieved by placing a blue filter in front of the lens and under-exposing the film. This technique, that the American film industry has used for many decades, is called ‘Day for Night’ (or ‘American Night’ in Europe.) But the images thus obtained don’t usually look realistic: they tend to be too bluish, and the objects’ brightness seems unnatural for night-light. In this article we introduce a digital Day for Night algorithm that achieves very realistic results. We use a set of very simple equations, based on real physical data and visual perception experimental data. To simulate the loss of visual acuity we introduce a novel diffusion Partial Differential Equation (PDE) which takes luminance into account and respects contrast, produces no ringing, is stable, very easy to implement and fast. The user only provides the original day image and the desired level of darkness of the result. The whole process from original day image to final night image is implemented in a few seconds, computations being mostly local.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvarez, L., Guichard, F., Lions, P.L., and Morel, J.M. 1993. Axioms and fundamental equations of image processing. Archive Rat. Mech. and Anal., 200–257.

  • Bénilan, P. and Crandall, M. 1981. The continuous dependence on φ of solutions of ut - δ φ(u) = 0.Indiana Math. J., 30(2):161–177.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bertalmío, M., Fort, P., and Sànchez-Crespo, D. 2004. Real-time, accurate Depth of Field using Anisotropic Diffusion and Programmable Graphics Cards.In Proceedings of 2nd 3DPVT. IEEE Computer Society Press.

  • Cornsweet, T.N. and Yellott, J.I. 1985. Intensity-independent spatial summation. Journal of Optical Society of America, 2(10):1769–1786.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Durand, F. and Dorsey, J. 2000. Interactive Tone Mapping.In Proc. Eurographics Workshop on Rendering. Springer Verlag.

  • Ferwerda, J.A., Pattanaik, S.N., Shirley, P., and Greenberg, D.P. 1996. A Model of Visual Adaptation for Realistic Image Synthesis.In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1996, pp. 249–258. ACM Press/ACM SIGGRAPH.

  • Finlayson, G., Hordley, S., and Drew, M. 2002. Removing shadows from images.In ECCV 2002.

  • Guichard, F. and Morel, J. 2000. Image Iterative Smoothing and P. D.E.‘s’. Book in preparation.

  • Hunt 1952. Light and Dark Adaptation in the Perception of Color. J. Optical Soc. America A, 42(3):190.

  • Lumet, S. 1995. Making Movies.Alfred A. Knopf.

  • Maloney, L.T. 1986. Evaluation of linear models of surface spectral reflectance with small numbers of parameters. J. Optical Soc. America-A, 3(10):1673–1683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, P. and Foltz, C.B. 2000. The Spectrum of the Night Sky Over Mount Hopkins and Kitt Peak: Changes after a decade. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 112(566).

  • Perona, P. and Malik, J. 1990. Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE TPAMI, 12(7):629–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanath, R., Kuehni, R., Snyder, W., and Hinks, D. 2004. Spectral spaces and color Spaces. Color Research and Application, 29(1):29–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, D. and Healey, G. 1997. Using a spectral reflectance model for the illumination-invariant recognition of local image structure. IEEE TPAMI, 19(10).

  • Stabell, B. and Stabell, U. 2002. Effects of rod activity on color perception with light adaptation. Journal of Optical Society of America, 19(7):1249–1258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, W., Shirley, P., and Ferwerda, J. 2002. A Spatial Post-Processing Algorithm for Images of Night Scenes. Journal of Graphics Tools, 7(1):1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tumblin, J. and Rushmeier, H. 1993. Tone Reproduction for Realistic Images. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 13(6):42–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tumblin, J. and Turk, G. 1999. LCIS: A Boundary Hierarchy for Detail-Preserving Contrast Reduction.In Siggraph 1999, Computer Graphics Proceedings, pp. 83–90.

  • Ward, G., Rushmeier, H., and Piatko, C. 1997. A Visibility Matching Tone Reproduction Operator for High Dynamic Range Scenes. IEEE Trans. on Visualization and Computer Graphics,3(4).

  • Wyszecki, G. and Stiles, W.S. 1982. Color Science: Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and Formulae (2nd ed.).New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gloria Haro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haro, G., Bertalmío, M. & Caselles, V. Visual Acuity in Day for Night. Int J Comput Vision 69, 109–117 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-006-6858-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-006-6858-4

Keywords

Navigation