Skip to main content
Log in

Wavelet-based Interpolation Scheme for Resolution Enhancement of Medical Images

  • Published:
Journal of Signal Processing Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A novel interpolation method for resolution enhancement is proposed in this paper. This method estimates wavelet coefficients in the high frequency subbands from a low resolution image using our proposed filters. An inverse wavelet transform is then performed for synthesis of a higher resolution image. Experimental results show that our proposed method outperforms other commonly used schemes objectively and subjectively. In addition, the processing time required in an algorithm-implemented Digital Signal Processor (DSP) is satisfied. By using the DSP hardware platform, off-line interpolation processing becomes easier and more feasible. The interpolated image has merits of high contrast and remarkable sharpness which essentially meet the requirements for interpolation of medical images. Our method can provide better quality of interpolated medical images compared to other methods to assist physicians in making diagnoses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pratt, W. K. (1978). Digital image processing. Toronto: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Keys, R. G. (1981). Cubic convolution interpolation for digital image processing. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, Signal Processing, 29(6), 1153–1160.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Temizel, A., & Vlachos, T. (2005). Wavelet domain image resolution enhancement using cycle-spinning. Electronics Letters, 31(3), 119–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang, S. G., Cvetkovic, Z., & Vetterli, M. (1995). Resolution enhancement of image using wavelet transform extrema extrapolation. Proceedings of International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 4, 2379–2382.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carey, K., Chuang, D. B., & Hemami, S. S. (1999). Regularity-preserving image interpolation. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 8(9), 1295–1297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Muresan, D. D., & Parks, T. W. (2000). Prediction of image detail. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, 2, 323–326.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Charnigo, R., Sun, J., & Muzic, R. (2006). A semi-local paradigm for wavelet denoising. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 15(3), 666–677.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Shih, Y. Y., Chen, J. C., & Liu, R. S. (2005). Development of wavelet de-noising technique for PET images. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 29, 297–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Eom, I. K., & Kim, Y. S. (2004). Wavelet-based denoising with nearly arbitrarily shaped window. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 11(12), 937–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang, K., & Aviyente, S. (2006). Information-theoretic wavelet packet subband selection for texture classification. Signal Processing, 86, 1410–1420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fahmy, G., Black Jr., J., & Panhanathan, S. (2006). Texture characterization for joint compression and classification based on human perception in the wavelet domain. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 15(6), 1389–1396.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dippel, S., Stahl, M., Wiemker, R., & Blafert, T. (2002). Multiscale contrast enhancement for radiographies: Laplacian pyramid versus fast wavelet transform. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 21(4), 343–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sweldens, W. (1996). The lifting scheme: a custom-design construction of biorthogonal wavelets. Applied Computing and Harmonic Analysis, 3(15), 186–200.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, Z., & Bovik, A. C. (2002). A universal image quality index. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 9(3), 81–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bovik, A. (ed.) (2000). Hand book of image and video processing. Academic.

  16. Prasad, M. N., Sowmya, A., & Hock, I. (2004). Feature subset selection using ICA for classifying emphysema in HRCT images. Proceeding of International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 4, 515–518.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Prasad, M. N., & Sowmya, A. (2004). Detection of bronchovascular pairs on HRCT lung images through relational learning. International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, 2, 1135–1138.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Walsh, C., Dowling, A., Meade, A., & Malone, J. (2005). Subjective and objective measures of image quality in digital fluoroscopy. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 117, 34–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. http://focus.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/tms320c6416.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgement

We appreciate the assistance and support of the radiologists from department of radiology, Tzu Chi general hospital, Hualien, Taiwan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wen-Li Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, WL., Yang, CC., Wu, HT. et al. Wavelet-based Interpolation Scheme for Resolution Enhancement of Medical Images. J Sign Process Syst Sign Image Video Technol 55, 251–265 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-008-0206-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-008-0206-6

Keywords

Navigation