Skip to main content
Log in

A Novel Method for Efficient Indoor–Outdoor Image Classification

  • Published:
Journal of Signal Processing Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most traditional indoor–outdoor scene classification approaches utilize the simple statistics of the low-level features, such as colors, edges, and textures. However, the existence of colors similar to sky or grass often yields the false positives. To cope with this deficiency, we focus on the orientation of low-level features in this paper. First, the image is partitioned into five block regions, whose features are differently weighted in the following classification stage according to the block positions. The edge and color orientation histogram (ECOH) descriptors are defined to represent each block efficiently. Finally, all ECOH values are concatenated to generate the feature vector and fed into the SVM classifier for the indoor–outdoor scene classification. To justify the efficiency and robustness of the proposed method, the evaluation is conducted over 1200 images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang, L., Mingjing, L., Hong-Jing, Z. (2002). Boosting image orientation detection with indoor vs. outdoor classification. IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV 2002), Orlando, FL, pp. 95–99.

  2. Bianco, S., Ciocca, G., Cusano, C., & Schettini, R. (2008). Improving color constancy using indoor–outdoor image classification. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 17(12), 2381–2392.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Szummer, M., Picard, R., W. (1998). Indoor–outdoor image classification. IEEE Workshop on Content-Based Access of Image and Video Database, Bombay, India, pp. 42–51.

  4. Ohta, Y., Kanade, T., & Sakai, T. (1980). Color information for region segmentation. Computer Graphics and Image Processing, 13, 222–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Serrano, N., Savakis, A., Luo, J. (2002). A computationally efficient approach to indoor/outdoor scene classification. International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), QC, Canada, 4, pp. 146–149.

  6. Gupta, L., et al. (2007). Indoor versus outdoor scene classification using probabilistic neural network. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 1, 123–133.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Payne, A., & Singh, S. (2005). Indoor vs. outdoor scene classification in digital photographs. Pattern Recognition, 38(10), 1533–1545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Luo, J., Savakis, A. (2001). Indoor vs. outdoor classification of consumer photographs using low-level and semantic features. International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Thessaloniki, Greece, vol. 2, pp. 745–748.

  9. Boutell, M., Luo, J. (2004). Bayesian fusion of camera metadata cues in semantic scene classification. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Washington, D.C., vol. 2, pp. 623–630.

  10. Boutell, M., Choudhury, A., Luo, J., Brown, C., M. (2006). Using semantic features for scene classification: how good do they need to be ?. International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME), Toronto, Canada, pp. 785–788.

  11. Vailaya, A., Figueiredo, M., Jain, A. K., & Zhang, H.-J. (2001). Image classification for content-based indexing. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 10(1), 117–130.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Spyrou, E., Mylonas, P., Avrithis, Y. (2008). Using region semantics and visual context for scene classification. International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), San Diego, CA, pp. 53–56.

  13. Kim, W., & Kim, C. (2009). An efficient indoor-outdoor scene classification method. Journal of the Institute of Electronics Engineers of Korea, 46-SP(5), 48–55.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Burges, C. J. (1998). A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2, 121–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen, Y.-T., & Chen, C.-S. (2008). Fast human detection using a novel boosted cascading structure with meta stages. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 17(8), 1452–1464.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Dalal, N., Triggs, B. (2005). Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), San Diego, CA, vol. 1, pp. 886–893.

  17. Gonzalez, R. C., & Woods, R. E. (2002). Digital image processing. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the MKE(The Ministry of Knowledge Economy), Korea, under the ITRC(Information Technology Research Center) support program supervised by the NIPA(National IT Industry Promotion Agency NIPA-2010-(C1090-0902-0017)).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Changick Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, W., Park, J. & Kim, C. A Novel Method for Efficient Indoor–Outdoor Image Classification. J Sign Process Syst 61, 251–258 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-009-0446-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-009-0446-0

Keywords

Navigation