Abstract
Study on the interactions between brain regions during electrophysiological measurements provides deep insights into the mechanisms of brain information processing. However, the strong spatial correlations from background spontaneous activity might mask the local evoked activity and lead to spurious connectivity results in connectivity analysis for event-related EEG and MEG. In this paper, we applied normalized Principal Component Analysis (PCA) preprocessing, Minimum Norm Estimation (MNE) and Granger causal connectivity analysis to identify stimulus-elicited neural sources and measure the effective connectivity among the sources for left somatosensory MEG responses of five healthy subjects. After normalized PCA preprocessing our results demonstrated increased coherences between channels with somatosensory evoked response at major physiological frequency bands, including Alpha and Beta band for somatosensory evoked response. The sources were located at contralateral primary somatosensory cortex, contralateral secondary somatosensory cortex and cingulate cortex. The information flow was processed through a complex pattern of both feedforward and feedback interactions between the sources. Compare with the results without normalized PCA preprocessing, our results are consistent with established connections between somatosensory regions and previous source modeling studies, which provides validation of the proposed approach.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Engel, A. K., Fries, P., & Singer, W. (2001). Dynamic predictions: oscillations and synchrony in top-down processing. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 2, 704–716.
Fries, P. (2005). A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 474–480.
Singer, W. (1999). Neuronal synchrony: a versatile code for the definition of relations? Neuron, 24, 49–65.
Varela, F., Lachaux, J. P., Rodriguez, E., & Martinerie, J. (2001). The brainweb: phase synchronization and large-scale integration. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 2, 229–239.
Inui, K., Wang, X., Tamura, Y., Kaneoke, Y., & Kakigi, R. (2004). Serial processing in the human somatosensory system. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 851–857.
Blatow, M., Nennig, E., Durst, A., Sartor, K., & Stippich, C. (2007). fMRI reflects functional connectivity of human somatosensory cortex. NeuroImage, 37, 927–936.
Chakrabarti, S., & Alloway, K. D. (2006). Differential origin of projections from SI barrel cortex to the whisker representations in SII and MI. The Journal of Comparative Neurology, 498, 624–636.
Zhang, H. Q., Murray, G. M., Coleman, G. T., Turman, A. B., Zhang, S. P., & Rowe, M. J. (2001). Functional characteristics of the parallel SI- and SII-projecting neurons of the thalamic ventral posterior nucleus in the marmoset. Journal of Neurophysiology, 85, 1805–1822.
Sutherland, M. T., & Tang, A. C. (2006). Reliable detection of bilateral activation in human primary somatosensory cortex by unilateral median nerve stimulation. NeuroImage, 33, 1042–1054.
Wegner, K., Forss, N., & Salenius, S. (2000). Characteristics of the human contra-versus ipsilateral SII cortex. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 894–900.
Backes, W. H., Mess, W. H., van Kranen-Mastenbroek, V., & Reulen, J. P. (2000). Somatosensory cortex responses to median nerve stimulation: fMRI effects of current amplitude and selective attention. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 1738–1744.
Del Gratta, C., Della Penna, S., Ferretti, A., Franciotti, R., Pizzella, V., Tartaro, A., et al. (2002). Topographic organization of the human primary and secondary somatosensory cortices: comparison of fMRI and MEG finds. NeuroImage, 17, 1373–1383.
Iannetti, G. D., Porro, C. P., Romanelli, P. L., Galeotti, F., & Cruccu, G. (2003). Representation of different trigeminal divisions within the primary and secondary human somatosensory cortex. NeuroImage, 19, 906–912.
Korvenoja, A., Huttunen, J., Salli, E., Pohjonen, H., Martinkauppi, S., Palva, J. M., et al. (1999). Activation of multiple cortical areas in response to somatosensory stimulation: combined magnetoencephalographic and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Human Brain Mapping, 8, 13–27.
Nevalainen, P., Ramstad, R., Isotalo, E., Haapanen, M. L., & Lauronen, L. (2006). Trigeminal somatosensory evoked magnetic fields to tactile stimulation. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117, 2007–2015.
Hlushchuk, Y., & Hari, R. (2006). Transient suppression of ipsilateral primary somatosensory cortex during tactile finger stimulation. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 5819–5824.
Nunez, P. L., Srinivasan, R., Westdorp, A. F., Wijesinghe, R. S., Tucker, D. M., Silberstein, R. B., et al. (1997). EEG coherency. I: statistics reference electrode, volume conduction, Laplacians, cortical imaging, and interpretation at multiple scales. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 103, 499–515.
Ewald, A., Marzetti, L., Zappasodi, F., Meinecke, F. C., & Nolte, G. (2012). Estimating true brain connectivity from EEG/MEG data invariant to linear and static tranformations in sensor space. NeuroImage, 60, 476–488.
Gomez-Herrero, G., Atienza, M., Egiazarian, K., & Cantero, J. (2008). Measuring directional coupling between EEG sources. NeuroImage, 43, 497–508.
Hui, B., Pantazis, D., Bressler, S., & Leahy, R. (2010). Identifying true cortical interactions in MEG using the nulling beamformer. NeuroImage, 49, 3161–3174.
Marzetti, L., Gratta, C. D., & Nolte, G. (2008). Understanding brain connectivity from EEG data by identifying systems composed of interacting sources. NeuroImage, 42, 87–98.
Nolte, G., Ziehe, A., Nikulin, V., Schlögl, A., Krämer, N., Brismar, T., et al. (2008). Robustly estimating the flow direction of information in complex physical systems. Physical Review Letters, 100, 234101.
Schoffelen, J. M., & Gross, J. (2009). Source connectivity analysis with MEG and EEG. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 1857–1865.
Stam, C., Nolte, G., & Daffertshofer, A. (2007). Phase lag index: assessment of functional connectivity from multi-channel EEG and MEG with diminished bias from common sources. Human Brain Mapping, 28, 1178–1193.
Srinivasan, R., Russell, D. P., Edelman, G. M., & Tononi, G. (1999). Frequency tagging competing stimuli in binocular rivalry reveals increased synchronization of neuromagnetic responses during conscious perception. The Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 5435–5448.
Gao, L., Zhang, T., Wang, J., & Stephen, J. (2013). Facilitating neuronal connectivity analysis of evoked responses by exposing local activity with principal component analysis preprocessing: simulation of evoked MEG. Brain Topography, 26, 201–211.
Taulu, S., & Kajola, M. (2005). Presentation of electromagnetic multichannel data: the signal space separation method. Journal of Applied Physics, 97, 124905.
Zhang, T., & Okada, Y. (2006). Recursive artifact windowed-single tone extraction method (RAW-STEM) as periodic noise filter for electrophysiological signals with interfering transients. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 155, 308–318.
Gourevitch, B., & Le Bouquin-Jeannes, R. (2003). K-means clustering method for auditory evoked potentials selection. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 41, 397–402.
Ranken, D. M., Stephen, J. M., & George, J. S. (2004). MUSIC seeded multi-dipole MEG modeling using the constrained start spatio-temporal modeling procedure. Neurology & Clinical Neurophysiology, 2004, 80.
Hämäläinen, M. S., & Ilmoniemi, R. J. (1994). Interpreting magnetic-fields of the brain-minimum norm estimates. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, 32, 35–42.
Seth, A. K. (2010). A MATLAB toolbox for granger causal connectivity analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 186, 262–273.
Nunez, P. L., & Srinivasan, R. (2006). A theoretical basis for standing and traveling brain waves measured with human EEG with implications for an integrated consciousness. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117, 2424–2435.
Cheyne, D., Gaetz, W., Garnero, L., Lachaux, J. P., Ducorps, A., Schwartz, D., et al. (2003). Neuromagnetic imaging of cortical oscillations accompanying tactile stimulation. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 599–611.
Spitzer, B., & Blankenburg, F. (2011). Stimulus-dependent EEG activity reflects internal updating of tactile working memory in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 8444–8449.
van de Wassenberg, W., van der Hoeven, J., Leenders, K., & Maurits, N. (2008). Multichannel recording of median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials. Neurophysiologie Clinique, 38, 9–21.
van de Wassenberg, W. J., Kruizinga, W. J., Van der Hoeven, J. H., Leenders, K. I., & Maurits, N. M. Multichannel recording of tibial-nerve somatosensory evoked potentials. Neurophysiologie Clinique.
Hu, L., Zhang, Z. G., & Hu, Y. (2012). A time-varying source connectivity approach to reveal human somatosensory information processing. NeuroImage, 62, 217–228.
Frot, M., Mauguiere, F., Magnin, M., & Garcia-Larrea, L. (2008). Parallel processing of nociceptive A-delta inputs in SII andmidcingulate cortex in humans. The Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 944–952.
Morecraft, R. J., Rockland, K. S., & Van Hoesen, G. W. (2000). Localization of area prostriata and its projection to the cingulate motor cortex in the rhesus monkey. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 192–203.
Acknowledgements
The research was supported by the NIH grants (J. Stephen and T. Zhang - P20AA017068, NCRR P20RR021938, NIGMS P20GM103472), and Suzhou Science and Technology Planning Projects (No.: SYS201510).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gao, L., Zhang, T., Wang, J. et al. A Pilot Study on Brain Source Localization and Connectivity Analysis with MEG Responses to Unilateral Tactile Stimuli in Healthy Children Using Normalized Principal Component Analysis. J Sign Process Syst 87, 259–267 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-016-1203-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-016-1203-9