Abstract
With the acceleration of economic information, networking, globalization and the new technological revolution, more and more scholars abroad have begun to pay attention to the research of knowledge networks. Some scholars even regard knowledge networks as a new field in the field of knowledge management research theoretical paradigm. This paper takes the research literature of knowledge network in Web of Science as the research object, and uses the information visualization software Cite Space, which is the world’s leading information, to visualize the geographical distribution of relevant knowledge networks in the international context by using traditional bibliometric methods and information visualization tools. High-impact authors, core literature, research hotspots for quantitative research and visual analysis, showing the classic literature and research hotspots and frontier fields of international knowledge management research in the form of maps, and analyzing knowledge maps and literature materials, content analysis, and induction The combination of methods and other methods to analyze and summarize the current research status of international knowledge management can provide useful reference for knowledge networks and related research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lombardo, V., Piana, F., & Mimmo, D. (2018). Semantics–informed geological maps: Conceptual modeling and knowledge encoding[J]. Computers & Geosciences, 116, 12–22.
Kane, L., & Boulle, M. (2018). ‘This was different’: transferring climate mitigation knowledge practices south to south with the MAPS programme[J]. Climate Policy, 18(9), 1–12.
Amir, S., & Aït-Kaci, H. (2017). An efficient and large-scale reasoning method for the semantic Web[J]. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 48(3), 1–22.
Siddiqui, I. F., Lee, U. J., Abbas, A., et al. (2017). Optimizing lifespan and energy resources of smart meter in a green cloud-based smart grid[J]. IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 99, 1–15.
Ying, C., & Wu, C. (2017). The hot spot transformation in the research evolution of maker[J]. Scientometrics, 113(3), 1307–1324.
Wang, Y., Zheng, J., Zhang, A., et al. (2017). Visualization maps for the evolution of research hotspots in the field of regional health information networks[J]. Inform Health Soc Care, 43(56), 1–21.
Berlanga, R., Nebot, V., & Pérez, M. (2014). Tailored semantic annotation for semantic search[J]. Journal of Web Semantics, 30(C), 69–81.
Gacitua-Decar, V., & Pahl, C. (2017). Structural Process Pattern Matching Based on Graph Morphism Detection[J]. International Journal of Software Engineering & Knowledge Engineering, 27(2), 153–189.
Gutierrez, C., Hurtado, C. A., & Mendelzon, A. O. (2011). Foundations of semantic web databases[J]. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 77(3), 520–541.
Tamer, M. (2016). ÖZSU. A survey of RDF data management systems[J]. Frontiers of Computer Science, 10(3), 418–432.
Zou, L., Zsu, M. T., & Graph-Based, R. D. F. (2017). Data Management[J]. Data Science and Engineering, 2(1), 56–70.
Wylot, M., Hauswirth, M., & Cudré-Mauroux, P. (2018). RDF data storage and query processing schemes: A survey[J]. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 51(4), 84.
Wen, D., Qin, L., Zhang, Y., et al. (2017). Efficient structural graph clustering: an index-based approach[J]. Proceedings of the Vldb Endowment, 11(3), 243–255.
Angles, R., Arenas, M., & Barcelo, P. (2016). Foundations of Modern Query Languages for Graph Databases[J]. Acm Computing Surveys, 50(5), 68.
McCune, R. R., Weninger, T., & Madey, G. (2015). Thinking like a vertex: a survey of vertex-centric frameworks for large-scale distributed graph processing[J]. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 48(2), 25.
Kaoudi, Z., & Manolescu, I. (2015). RDF in the clouds: a survey[J]. Vldb Journal, 24(1), 67–91.
Abdelaziz, I., Harbi, R., & Khayyat, Z. (2017). A survey and experimental comparison of distributed SPARQL engines for very large RDF data[J]. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 10(13), 2049–2060.
Heidari, S., Simmhan, Y., & Calheiros, R. N. (2018). Scalable graph processing frameworks: A taxonomy and open challenges[J]. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 51(3), 60.
Kalavri, V., Vlassov, V., & Haridi, S. (2018). High-level programming abstractions for distributed graph processing[J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 30(2), 305–324.
Yan, D., Bu, Y., & Tian, Y. (2017). Big graph analytics platforms[J]. Foundations and Trends in Databases, 7(1–2), 1–195.
Qiu, H., Noura H, & Qiu, M. A. (2019). A User-Centric Data Protection Method for Cloud Storage Based on Invertible DWT[J]. IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, 150:1–2. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCC.2019.2911679.
Gai, K., Qiu, M., & Zhao, H. (2017). Privacy-preserving data encryption strategy for big data in mobile cloud computing[J]. IEEE Transactions on Big Data, 6(1), 1–12.
Gai, K., Qiu, M., Zhao, H. (2016). Security-Aware Efficient Mass Distributed Storage Approach for Cloud Systems in Big Data[J]. 2016 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Big Data Security on Cloud, IEEE International Conference on High Performance and Computing, S. IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Data and Security, 4:140–145.
Shao, Z., Xue, C., & Zhuge, Q. (2006). Security protection and checking in embedded system integration against buffer overflow attacks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 55(4), 443–453.
Makari, F., Teflioudi, C., Gemulla, R., et al. (2015). Shared-memory and shared-nothing stochastic gradient descent algorithms for matrix completion[J]. Knowledge & Information Systems, 42(3), 493–523.
Coleman, G. A. L., & Nelson, R. P. (2018). On the formation of compact planetary systems via concurrent core accretion and migration[J]. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 457(3), 2480–2500.
Pak, I., & Panova, G. (2017). On the complexity of computing Kronecker coefficients[J]. Computational Complexity, 26(1), 1–36.
Pokorny, J. (2013). NoSQL databases: a step to database scalability in web environment[J]. International Journal of Web Information Systems, 9(1), 278–283.
Subhrajyoti Bordoloi, B. K. (2014). Designing Graph Database Models from Existing Relational Databases[J]. International Journal of Computer Applications, 74(1), 25–31.
Borghi, A. M., Binkofski, F., Castelfranchi, C., et al. (2017). The challenge of abstract concepts[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 143(3), 263–292.
Papoulias, N., Denker, M., Ducasse, S., et al. (2017). End-user abstractions for meta-control: Reifying the reflectogram[J]. Science of Computer Programming, 140, 2–16.
Marinka, Z., Monica, A., & Jure, L. (2018). Modeling polypharmacy side effects with graph convolutional networks[J]. Bioinformatics, 34(13), i457–i466.
Hu, P., Gu, D. X., & Zhu, Y. (2013). Collaborative case-based reasoning for knowledge discovery of elders health assessment system[J]. Open Biomed Eng J, 8(1), 68–74.
Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (2013). Argumentative inference in uncertain and inconsistent knowledge bases[J]. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence :411–419.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Science and Technology Project of State Grid Corporation of China (Project number: 5211XT180045).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, H., Jiang, Y., Fan, H. et al. Visualization Analysis of Knowledge Network Research Based on Mapping Knowledge. J Sign Process Syst 93, 333–344 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-020-01595-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-020-01595-2