Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Broadcasting info-pages to sensors: efficiency versus energy conservation

  • Published:
Wireless Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In sensor networks applied to monitoring applications, individual sensors may perform preassigned or on-demand tasks, or missions. Data updates (info-pages) may be sent to sensors from a command center, via a time-division broadcast channel. Sensors are normally put in sleep mode when not actively listening, in order to conserve energy in their batteries. Hence, a schedule is required that specifies when sensors should listen for updates and when they should sleep. The performance of such a schedule is evaluated based on data-related costs and sensor-related costs. Data-related costs reflect the obsoleteness of current sensor data, or the delay while sensors wait for updated instructions. Sensor-related costs reflect the energy that sensors consume while accessing the broadcast channel and while switching between the active and sleeping modes (rebooting). Our goal is a schedule with the minimum total cost. Previous related work has explored data-related costs, but listening cost has been addressed only under the assumption that the rebooting operation is free. This paper formulates a new cost model, which recognizes the cost of sensor rebooting. We derive an optimal schedule for the single-sensor setting. We proceed to consider schedules of multiple sensors; we formulate a mathematical program to find an optimal fractional schedule for this setting and provide a solution to the lower bound. Several heuristics for scheduling multiple sensors are introduced and analyzed, and various tradeoffs among the cost factors are demonstrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ammar, M. H., & Wong, J. W. (1985). The design of teletext broadcast cycles. Performance Evaluation, 5(4), 235–242. doi:10.1016/0166-5316(85)90024-0. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V13-48TDD8J-6H/2/1937e8bb1c84ddad692b2dc4d38453b4.

  2. Ammar, M. H., & Wong, J. W. (1987). On the optimality of cyclic transmission in teletext systems. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 35(1), 68–73. doi:10.1109/TCOM.1987.1096659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bar-Noy, A., Bhatia, R., Naor, J. S., & Schieber, B. (2002). Minimizing service and operation costs of periodic scheduling. Mathematics of Operations and Research, 27, 518–544. doi:10.1287/moor.27.3.518.314, http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=767826.769508.

  4. Acharya, S., Franklin, M., & Zdonik, S. (1995). Dissemination-based data delivery using broadcast disks. IEEE Personal Communications, 2(6), 50–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bluetooth technical specifications, version 2.0. Available from http://www.bluetooth.com/ (2004).

  6. Khanna, S., & Zhou, S. (1998). On indexed data broadcast. In Proceedings of the thirtieth annual ACM symposium on theory of computing, STOC ’98 (pp. 463–472). ACM, New York, NY, USA. doi:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/276698.276859.

  7. Raghunathan, V., Schurgers, C., Park, S., Srivastava, M., & Shaw, B. (2002). Energy-aware wireless microsensor networks. In IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, pp. 40–50.

  8. Wang, A., Cho, S., Sodini, C., & Chandrakasan, A. (2001). Energy efficient modulation and mac for asymmetric rf microsensor systems. In Proceedings of the 2001 international symposium on low power electronics and design, ISLPED ’01 (pp. 106–111). ACM, New York, NY, USA. doi:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/383082.383105.

  9. Banerjee, N., Sorber, J., Corner, M. D., Rollins, S., & Ganesan, D. (2007). Triage: Balancing energy consumption and quality of service in a microserver. In ACM/USENIX conference on mobile systems, applications, and services (MobiSys), pp. 152–164.

  10. Wowra, J. P. (2004). Approaches to reduce energy consumption of wlan devices. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.95.1366.

  11. Smartrf cc2420 data sheet, chipcon (2004).

  12. Momentus 5400.3 2.5-inch storage for mainstream notebook pcs, seagate (2005).

  13. Rabaey, J. M., Ammer, J., Karalar, T., Li, S., Otis, B., Sheets, M., et al. (2002). Picoradios for wireless sensor networks: The next challenge in ultra-low-power design. In Proceedings of the international solid-state circuits conference. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=993005.

  14. Rabaey, J. M., Ammer, M. J., da Silva, Jr., J. L., Patel, D., & Roundy, S. (2000). Picoradio supports ad hoc ultra-low power wireless networking. IEEE Computer Magazine, 33(7), 42–48. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=869369.

  15. Reason, J. M., & Rabaey, J. M. (2004). A study of energy consumption and reliability in a multi-hop sensor network. ACM Mobile Computing and Communications Review, 8(1), 84–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was sponsored by US Army Research laboratory and the UK Ministry of Defence and was accomplished under Agreement Number W911NF-06-3-0001. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the US Army Research Laboratory, the US Government, the UK Ministry of Defence, or the UK Government. The US and UK Governments are authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Government purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation hereon.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yosef Alayev.

Additional information

Conference version of the paper appeared in IEEE SECON'08.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alayev, Y., Bar-Noy, A. & La Porta, T.F. Broadcasting info-pages to sensors: efficiency versus energy conservation. Wireless Netw 17, 1529–1542 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-011-0362-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-011-0362-7

Keywords

Navigation