Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Access stratum resource management for reliable u-healthcare service in LTE networks

  • Published:
Wireless Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the rapid growth of elderly population, ubiquitous healthcare (u-healthcare) service combined with advanced wireless networking technology is gaining popularity. The advance in medical sensor technology has boasted up the u-healthcare market potential. However, the global connectivity with a sufficient level of reliability is still an issue to study for its prototype development. In our previous study (Lee et al. In: Proc BodyNets 2010, Lee et al. in J Commun Netw 13(2):160–166, 2011), the energy efficient packet-level scheduling was studied but the scheduling and management topics in the access stratum, which is the beginning part of end-to-end connection for ubiquitous healthcare service, are still open. In this paper, we study an efficient and adaptive method that can provide u-healthcare user devices with an increased level of access privilege so that the healthcare related user data, which is sometimes delay-critical, can be more favorable admitted to the access stratum. We develop a mathematical formulation for the access control in access stratum domain over the existing 3.9-th generation cellular communication standard, called long term evolution (LTE) and devise an efficient and exact algorithm to solve it. The proposed method has simplicity in implementation and efficiency in operation. In addition, it can improve key performance measures, such as call blocking and call dropping performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In this paper, a chunk of bits is said to be ‘decodable’ if no error is detected by a given error detection scheme.

  2. The value c may vary depending on eNB’s. For the sake of expressional simplicity, we do not apply the cell index to c.

  3. There are many different nodes/entities in the core network which provide their unique services and functions, such as mobility management, authentication, and so on. However, for the sake of simplicity, we will loosely say that this decision is made by eNB in this paper unless there is a confusing issue.

  4. In our example, the ‘boundary point’ is exactly the adjacent point since there is only one unit available, if any, in the setting since the required volume is the same among different classes.

Abbreviations

3GPP:

3rd generation partnership project

BAN:

Body area network

BCU:

Body control unit

BSU:

Body sensor unit

DeNB:

Donor eNB

eNB:

Evolved node B

LTE:

Long term evolution

MBAN:

Medical BAN

MME:

Mobility management entity

MMTEL:

Mobile multimedia telephony

RAN:

Radio access network

RN:

Relay node

UE:

User equipment

WBAN:

Wireless BAN

References

  1. Kinsella, K., & Velkoff, V. A. (2001). An aging world. US Department of Health and Human Services and US Department of Commerce, November 2001.

  2. Kailas, A., & Ingram, M. A. (2009). Wireless aspects of telehealth. Wireless Personal Communications, 51(4), 673–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee, K.-D., Kim, S., & Yi, B. K. (2010). Low power u-healthcare services using MDC packet-level scheduling for in/on-body wireless multi-hop links in a medical body area network. In Proceedings of BodyNets 2010, Corfu Island, Greece.

  4. Lee, K.-D., Kim, S., & Yi, B. K. (2011). Packet-level scheduling for implant communications using forward error correction in an erasure correction mode for reliable u-healthcare service. Journal of Communication Network, 13(2), 160–166.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, M., Gonzalez, S., Vasilakos, A., Cao, H., & Leung, V. (2010). Body area networks: A survey. ACM/Springer Mobile Networks and Applications, 16(2), 171–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Phunchongharn, P., Niyato, D., Hossain, E., & Camorlinga, S. (2010). An EMI-aware prioritized wireless access scheme for e-health applications in hospital environments. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 14(5), 1247−1258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhou, L., Zheng, B., Cui, J., & Geller, B. (2011). Media-aware distributed scheduling over wireless body sensor networks. In Proceedings of IEEE ICC’11, Kyoto, Japan.

  8. Caceres, C., Fernandez, A., Ossowski, S., & Vasirani, M. (2009). Agent-based semantic service discovery for healthcare: An organizational approach. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 21(6), 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lee, K.-D., & Yum, T.-S. P. (2011). On pareto-efficiency between profit and utility in OFDM resource allocation. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 58(11), 3277–3285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. IEEE 802.15 Wireless Personal Area Network. (2009). Channel model for body area network (BAN). IEEE 802.15-08-0780-09-0006.

  11. Lee, K.-D., & Leung, V. (2009). Utility-based rate-controlled parallel wireless transmission of multimedia streams with multiple importance levels. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 8(1), 81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 3GPP TS 36.300. (2011). Evolved universal terrestrial radio access (E-UTRA) and evolved universal terrestrial radio access network (E-UTRAN); Overall description; Stage 2, v.10.3.0.

  13. 3GPP TR 36.912. (2010). Feasibility study for further advancements for E-UTRA (LTE-Advanced), v.9.3.0.

  14. 3GPP TS 36.304. (2011). Evolved universal terrestrial radio access (E-UTRA); user equipment (UE) procedures in idle mode. v.10.1.0.

  15. 3GPP TS 36.331. (2011). Evolved universal terrestrial radio access (E-UTRA); radio resource control (RRC); protocol specification. v.10.1.0.

  16. Kim, S.-H., Chang, K.-N., & Kim, S. (2000). A channel allocation for cellular mobile radio systems using simulated annealing. Telecommunication Systems, 14, 95–106.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Lagrange, X., & Jabbari, B. (1998). Fairness in wireless microcellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicle Technology, 47(2), 472–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Oh, S.-H., & Tcha, D. W. (1992). Prioritized channel assignment in a cellular radio network. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 40(7), 1259–1269.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Naghshineh, M., & Schwartz, M. (1996). Distributed call admission control in mobile/wireless networks. IEEE Journal of Selected Areas Communications 14, 289–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Takanashi, H., & Rappaport, S. S. (1997). Dynamic base station selection for personal communication systems with distributed control schemes. Proceedings of 47th VTC, 3, 1787−1791.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Athanasios V. Vasilakos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, KD., Vasilakos, A.V. Access stratum resource management for reliable u-healthcare service in LTE networks. Wireless Netw 17, 1667–1678 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-011-0371-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-011-0371-6

Keywords

Navigation