Skip to main content
Log in

Effective channel control random beamforming for single user MIMO systems

  • Published:
Wireless Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In general, it has been demonstrated that the performance of conventional random beamforming (RBF) approaches that of ideal eigen beamforming when the number of users is large in a cell by exploiting multi-user diversity. However, if the number of users decreases, such as femto or pico cell in the 3GPP Long Term Evolution-Advanced standard, the performance degradation occurs in the RBF scheme due to the lack of multi-user diversity. In this paper, we present a novel precoder based on singular value decomposition (SVD) using feedback of weight values in an RBF environment. For achieving performance improvement in the femto cell environment, we generate a precoding matrix appropriate to user channel by controlling the feedback values with an equivalent feedback quantity. In the simulation results, we verify the outstanding performance of the proposed scheme for a small number of users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. To maximize link capacity, we allocate the total power to the first beam. Here, we define this allocation as the MSPA. In general, for a small number of users, such as 3GPP LTE-A, the interference between beamforming vectors of a selected user becomes large. Thus, it has been demonstrated that a better performance can be achieved by allocating the total transmit power to a single beam than other power allocation schemes [4, 7].

  2. If so many users are taken into account, the tendency would be changed. However, in this paper, the proposed scheme is not designed for such large number of users.

References

  1. Telatar, I. E. (1999). Capacity of multi-antenna Gaussian channels. European Transactions on Telecommunications, 10, 585–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Viswananth, P. & Tse, D. (2003). Sum capacity of the vector Gaussian broadcast channel and uplink-downlink duality. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 49, 1912–1921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yu, W. & Cioffi, J. (2004). Sum capacity og Gaussian vector broadcast channels. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 50, 1875–1892.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Sharif, M. & Hassibi, B. (2005). On the capacity of MIMO broadcast channels with partial side information. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 51(2), 506–522.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim, E. Y. & Chun, J. (2005). Random beamforming in MIMO systems exploiting efficient multi-user diversity. Proceedings of the IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, 1, 202–205.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chung, J., Hwang, C.-S., Kim, K. & Kim, Y. K. (2003). A random beamforming technique in MIMO systems exploiting multiuser diversity. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 21, 848–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kountouris, M., Gesbert, D., & Salzer, T. (2008). Enhanced multiuser random beamforming: Dealing with the not so large number of users case. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 26(8), 1536–1545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Love, D. J., Heath, R., Lau, V. K. N., Gesbert, D., Rao, B. D., & Andrews, M. (2008). An overview of limited feedback in wireless communication systems. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 26(8), 1341–1365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim, S. J., Kim, H. J., Park, C. S., & Lee, K. B. (2006). On the performance of multiuser MIMO systems in WCDMA/HSDPA: Beamforming, feedback and user diversity. IEICE Transactions on Communications, E98-B(8), 2161–2169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang, K., Andrews, J. G., & Heath, R. W. Jr. (2009). Performance of orthogonal beamforming for SDMA with limited feedabck. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 58(1), 152–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Son, H. & Lee, S. (2011). Iterative best beam selection for random unitary beamforming. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 59(4), 968–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Park, J., Son, H. & Lee, S. (2009). Throughput and QoS improvement via fixed relay station cooperated beam-forming. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 8(5), 2004–2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Technical Report, “3GPP TS 36.814 V1.5.0. Dec. 2009.

  14. Yoo, T., & Goldsmith, A. (2006). On the optimality of multiantenna broadcast scheduling using zero-forcing beamforming. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 24(3), 528–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Horn, R. A. & Johnson, C. R. (1999). Matrix Analysis. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gersho, A. (1977). Quantization. IEEE Communications Society Magazine, 15(5), 16–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Haykin, S. (2002). Adaptive filter theory, 4th ed.. Englewood Cliffs M.J.: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jakes, W. C. (1994). Microwave mobile communications, IEEE ed. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Park, J., Lee, H. & Le, S. (2011). Beamforming matrix transformation for random beamforming. IEEE VTC Spring, pp. 1–5, May 2011.

  20. Viswananth, P., Tse, D., & Nakajima, N. (2002). Opportunistic beamforming using dumb antennas. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 48(6), 1277–1294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chae, H., Kim, Y., Yang, J. H., Ihm, B.-C. & Kim, D. K. (2008). Multimode random beamforming for multiuser downlink MIMO system with limited feedback. Proceedings of the IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, 1, 837–841.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Samsung Electronics, Downlink MIMO for EUTRA, Feb. 2006. 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 44/R1-060335.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the MKE (The Ministry of Knowledge Economy), Korea, under the ITRC (Information Technology Research Center) support program supervised by the NIPA (National IT Industry Promotion Agency)" (NIPA-2012-H0301-12-1001). This research was supported by the MKE (The Ministry of Knowledge Economy), Korea, under the “ITRC (Information Technology Research Center)” support program supervised by the NIPA (National IT Industry Promotion Agency)" (NIPA-2012-H0301-12-1008). This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2010-0011995).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanghoon Lee.

Appendix: Derivation of the closed form for w k,1 and w k,2 for two transmit antennas

Appendix: Derivation of the closed form for w k,1 and w k,2 for two transmit antennas

For deriving a closed form solution from Eq. (13), the intermediate equations are the following:

$$ \widetilde{v}_{k,11} = v_{b,11} $$
(17)
$$ \left(1+\left| {\frac{{C_{k}}^{2}}{(D_{k}-\widetilde{\lambda}_{k,1})^{2}} } \right|\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}} = v_{b,11} $$
(18)
$$ \frac{ \left| { {C_{k}}^{2}} \right|}{v_{b,11}^{-2} - 1} = (D_{k}-\widetilde{\lambda}_{k,1})^{2}. $$
(19)

Assume \(a_{k} = h_{k,11}^{\ast}h_{k,11}+h_{k,21}^{\ast}h_{k,21}, \) \(b_{k} = h_{k,11}^{\ast}h_{k,12}+h_{k,21}^{\ast}h_{k,22}, \,c_{k} = h_{k,11}h_{k,12}^{\ast}+h_{k,21}h_{k,22}^{\ast}\) and \(d_{k} = h_{k,12}^{\ast}h_{k,12}+h_{k,22}^{\ast}h_{k,22}. \) Then, we can rewrite Eq. (19) as

$$ Qw_{k,1}w_{k,2} = A_{k} - D_{k} - \sqrt{(A_{k} + D_{k})^{2} - 4(A_{k}D_{k}-B_{k}C_{k})} $$
(20)
$$ Qw_{k,1}w_{k,2} = a_{k}w_{k,1}^{2} - d_{k}w_{k,2}^{2} - \sqrt{a_{k}^{2}w_{k,1}^{4} + d_{k}^{2}w_{k,2}^{4} - 2(a_{k}d_{k} - 2b_{k}c_{k})w_{k,1}^{2}w_{k,2}^{2}} $$
(21)

where \(Q = \left(\frac{4\left| { {c_{k}}^{2} } \right|}{v_{b,11}^{-2} - 1}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}. \) Here, Q is a positive real value because w k,1,  w k,2 and \(\left| { {c_{k}}^{2} } \right|\) are positive real values and v −2 b,11  > 1. Then, we can rewrite Eq. (21) as

$$ 2Qa_{k}w_{k,1}^{2} - 2Qd_{k}w_{k,2}^{2} + (4b_{k}c_{k} - Q^{2})w_{k,1}w_{k,2} = 0. $$
(22)

For obtaining a closed form of w k,1, use \(w_{k,2} = \sqrt{P - w_{k,1}^{2}}\) from Eq. (12). Then,

$$ w_{k,1}^{4}\{(Q^{2} - 4b_{k}c_{k})^{2} + (2Qa_{k} + 2Qd_{k})^{2}\}\\ + w_{k,1}^{2}\{P(Q^{2} - 4b_{k}c_{k})^{2} + 4PQd_{k}(2Qa_{k} + 2Qd_{k})\} - 4P^{2}Q^{2}d_{k}^{2} = 0 $$
(23)
$$ \hat{a_{k}}w_{k,1}^{4} + \hat{b_{k}}w_{k,1}^{2} + \hat{c_{k}} = 0 $$
(24)

where \(\hat{a_{k}} = (Q^{2} - 4b_{k}c_{k})^{2} + (2Qa_{k} + 2Qd_{k})^{2}, \,\hat{b_{k}} = P(Q^{2} - 4b_{k}c_{k})^{2} + 4PQd_{k}(2Qa_{k} + 2Qd_{k})\) and \(\hat{c_{k}} = -4P^{2}Q^{2}d_{k}^{2}. \) Then, we can solve Eq. (24) by using the square root of quadratic formula or quartic formula as

$$ w_{k,1} = \sqrt{\frac{-\hat{b_{k}}+\sqrt{\hat{b_{k}}^{2} - 4\hat{a_{k}}\hat{c_{k}}}}{2\hat{a_{k}}}} \quad \hbox{and} \; w_{k,2} = \sqrt{P - w_{k,1}} $$
(25)

where w k,1 and w k,2 are positive real values.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, H., Park, J., Son, H. et al. Effective channel control random beamforming for single user MIMO systems. Wireless Netw 19, 175–186 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-012-0458-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-012-0458-8

Keywords

Navigation