Abstract
Multi-interface terminal in heterogeneous wireless networks will have network access from diverse access technologies. Multiple attribute for decision making including user preference will increase the complexity of handoff process. Various approaches have been proposed to solve the complexity problem of handoff decision. In this paper, multi attribute decision making algorithms Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, Simple Additive Weighting (SAW), Total Order Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), and Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) methods have been proposed for handoff decision in a WiMAX–WLAN environment to facilitate user with better quality of service. AHP has been used for calculation of weights of decision parameters. Numerical results show that SAW, TOPSIS and GRA provide almost similar performance. SAW is very simple to implement but probability of error is less in GRA because values of decision attribute are directly used for ranking of alternatives. TOPSIS is sensitive to the attribute with high score.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dang, M. S., Prakash, A., Anvekar D. K., Kapoor, D., & Shorey, R. Fuzzy logic based handoff in wireless networks. In IEEE 51st Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC’00) (Vol. 3, pp. 2375–2379). Tokyo, Japan.
Chen, S.-J., Hwang, C. L., & Hwang, F. P. (1992). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. New York: Springer.
Zhang, W. (2004). Handover decision using fuzzy MADM in heterogeneous networks. In Proceedings of IEEE WCNC’04, Atlanta, GA, March 2004.
Song, Q., & Jamalipour, A. (2005). Network selection in an integrated wireless LAN and UMTS environment using mathematical modeling and computing techniques. IEEE Wireless Communications Magazine, 12(3), 42–48.
Stevens-Navarro, E., & Wong, V. (2006). Comparison between vertical handoff decision algorithms for heterogeneous wireless networks. In IEEE 63rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC’06) (Vol. 2, pp. 947–951). Melbourne, Australia, May 2006.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process, planning, priority setting, resource allocation,. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Afsari, A., Mjahed, M., & Yusuff, R. M. (2010). Simple additive weighting approach to personal selection problem. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 1(5), 511–515.
Sgora, A., Gizelis, C. A., & Vergados, D. D. (2011). Network selection in a WiMAX–WiFi environment. Pervasive and Mobile computing, 7(5), 584–594.
Huszak, A., & Imre, S. (2010). Eliminating rank reversal phenomenon in GRA based network selection method. In IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC’10) (pp. 1–6) Budapest, Hungry, May 2010.
WiMAX Forum. (2008). WiMAX system evaluation methodology V2.1. July 2008, pp 230. Available: http://www.wimaxforum.org/technology/documents/.
In, C. S., Jain, R., & Tamimi, A.-K. (2009). Scheduling in IEEE 802.16e mobile WiMAX networks: Key issues and a survey. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 27(2), 156–171.
WiMAX Forum. (2010). Network architecture: Architecture, detailed protocols and procedures WiFi–WiMAX Interworking. WMF-T37-010-R016v01, November 2010, pp. 22–23.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singh, N.P., Singh, B. Vertical handoff decision in 4G wireless networks using multi attribute decision making approach. Wireless Netw 20, 1203–1211 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-013-0670-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-013-0670-1