Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

An energy aware event-driven routing protocol for cognitive radio sensor networks

  • Published:
Wireless Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cognitive radio sensor network (CRSN) is an intelligent and reasonable combination of cognitive radio technology and wireless sensor networks. It poses significant challenges to the design of topology maintenance techniques due to dynamic primary-user activities, which in turn decreases the data delivery performance of the network as well as it’s lifetime. This paper aims to provide a solution to the CRSN clustering and routing problem using an energy aware event-driven routing protocol (ERP) for CRSN. Upon detection of an event, the ERP determines eligible nodes for clustering according to local positions of CRSN nodes between the event and the sink and their residual energy levels. Cluster-heads are selected from the eligible nodes according to their residual energy values, available channels, neighbors and distance to the sink. In ERP, cluster formation is based on relative spectrum awareness such that channels with lower primary user appearance probability are selected as common data channels for clusters. For data routing, ERP employs hop-by-hop data forwarding approach through the CHs and primary/secondary gateways towards the sink. Through extensive simulations, we demonstrate that the proposed ERP provides with better network performances compared to those of the state-of-the-art protocols under a dynamic spectrum-aware data transmission environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This is a reasonable assumption since it is predicted that the other nodes will also die out of energy soon after the first node [28, 29]

References

  1. Akyildiz, I. F., Lee, W.-Y., Vuran, M. C., & Mohanty, S. (2006). NeXt generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: A survey. Computer Networks Journal (ELSEVIER), 50, 2127–2159.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Akyildiz, I. F., Lee, W.-Y., & Chowdhury, K. R. (2009). CRAHNs: Cognitive radio ad hoc networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 7(5), 810–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Razzaque, M. A., Miazi, M. N. S., Tabassum, M., & Abdullah-Al-Wadud, M. (2014). An energy-efficient common control channel selection mechanism for cognitive radio ad hoc networks. Annals of Telecommunications, 70, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Akan, O. B., Karli, O. B., & Ergul, O. (2009). Cognitive radio sensor networks. IEEE Network Magazine, 23(4), 34–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shah, G. A., & Akan, O. B. (2013). Spectrum-aware cluster-based routing for cognitive radio sensor networks. In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) (pp. 2885–2889).

  6. Oey, C. H. W., Christian, I., & Moh, S. (2012). Energy- and cognitive-radio-aware routing in cognitive radio sensor networks. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 2012, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sarma, H. K. D., Bhuyan, B., & Dutta, N. (2013). An energy balanced routing protocol for cognitive wireless sensor networks. In World Congress on Engineering & Computer Science, San Francisco, USA.

  8. Heinzelman, W. R., Chandrakasan, A., & Balakrishnan, H. (2000). Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences (pp. 3005–3014).

  9. Lindsey, S., & Raghavendra, C. S. (2002). PEGASIS: Power efficient gathering in sensor information systems. In Proceedings of IEEE Aerospace Conference.

  10. Manjeshwar, A., & Agrawal, D. P. (2001). TEEN: A routing protocol for enhanced efficiency in wireless sensor networks. In Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium. Proceedings 15th International (pp. 2009–2015).

  11. Manjeshwar, A., & Agrawal, D. P. (2002). APTEEN: A hybrid protocol for efficient routing and comprehensive information retrieval in wireless sensor networks. In IPDPS IEEE Computer Society .

  12. Chowdhury, K. R., & Akyildiz, I. F. (2011). CRP: A routing protocol for cognitive radio ad hoc networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 29, 794–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chowdhury, K. R., & Di Felice, M. (2009). SEARCH: A routing protocol for mobile cognitive radio ad-hoc networks. Computer Communications, 32, 1983–1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ding, L., Melodia, T., Batalama, S. N., Matyjas, J. D., & Medley, Michael J. (2010). Cross-layer routing and dynamic spectrum allocation in cognitive radio ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 59, 1969–1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wen, Y.-F., & Liao, W. (2010). On qos routing in wireless ad-hoc cognitive radio networks. In VTC Spring (pp. 1–5). IEEE.

  16. Ozger, M., & Akan, O. B. (2013). Event-driven spectrum-aware clustering in cognitive radio sensor networks. In INFOCOM, 2013 Proceedings IEEE (pp. 1483–1491).

  17. The network simulator version 3 NS-3. http://www.nsnam.org/. Accessed 14 March 2014.

  18. Anitha, R., & Sasikumar, M. (2014). Cluster based routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Innovative Research in Advanced Engineering, 1, 197–204.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yang, J., Li, J. D., Cai, X. L., & Zhu, L. (2012). Scalable cluster-based routing in large wireless sensor networks. Journal of Networks, 7, 1990–1995.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Xing, X., Jing, T., Cheng, W., Huo, Y., & Cheng, X. (2013). Spectrum prediction in cognitive radio networks. Wireless Communications, IEEE, 20(2), 90–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sharma, M., & Sahoo, A. (2010). residual white space distribution-based opportunistic channel access for cognitive radio enabled devices. SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 40(4), 427–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li, X., & Zekavat, S. A. (2008). Traffic pattern prediction and performance investigation for cognitive radio systems. In Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, WCNC. IEEE (pp. 894–899).

  23. Langendoen, K., & Reijers, N. (2003). Distributed localization in wireless sensor networks: A quantitative comparison. Computer Networks, 43, 499–518.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Xiao, B., Chen, L., Xiao, Q., & Li, M. (2010). Reliable anchor-based sensor localization in irregular areas. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 9, 60–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dutta, P., & Culler, D. (2008). Practical asynchronous neighbor discovery and rendezvous for mobile sensing applications. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems (pp. 71–84). ACM.

  26. Hossain, R., Rijul, R. H., Razzaque, M. A., & Sarkar, A. M. J. (2014). Prioritized medium access control in cognitive radio ad hoc networks: Protocol and analysis. Wireless Personal Communications, 79(3), 2383–2408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Farid, Z., Nordin, R., & Ismail, M. (2013). Recent advances in wireless indoor localization techniques and system. Journal of Computer Networks and Communications, 2013, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Razzaque, M. A., Hong, C. S., & Lee, S. (2011). Data-centric multiobjective qos-aware routing protocol for body sensor networks. Sensors, 11, 917–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Alam, M. M.., Razzaque, M. A., Mamun-Or-Rashid, M., & Hong, C. S. (2009). Energy-aware qos provisioning for wireless sensor networks. Journal of Communications and Networks, 11, 390–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to extend their sincere appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for its funding of this research through the Research Group Project No. RGP-VPP-281.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Green Networking Research Group, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Univeristy of Dhaka, Dhaka, 1000, Bangladesh

    Madiha Tabassum, Md. Abdur Razzaque & Md. Nazmus Sakib Miazi

  2. Chair of Pervasive and Mobile Computing, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11543, KSA

    Mohammad Mehedi Hassan, Abdulhameed Alelaiwi & Atif Alamri

Authors
  1. Madiha Tabassum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Md. Abdur Razzaque
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Md. Nazmus Sakib Miazi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mohammad Mehedi Hassan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Abdulhameed Alelaiwi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Atif Alamri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Md. Abdur Razzaque.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tabassum, M., Razzaque, M.A., Miazi, M.N.S. et al. An energy aware event-driven routing protocol for cognitive radio sensor networks. Wireless Netw 22, 1523–1536 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-015-1043-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-015-1043-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation