Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

5G-ZOOM-Game: small cell zooming using weighted majority cooperative game for energy efficient 5G mobile network

  • Published:
Wireless Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rapid escalation of user traffic and service innovation has made the deployment of small cell base stations essential for eventually decreasing energy consumption in future generation wireless network. An energy efficient small cell zooming strategy is proposed using weighted majority cooperative game for two-tier fifth generation (5G) mobile network. The proposed strategy is referred as ‘5G-ZOOM-Game’. Small cells ‘zoom in’ and ‘zoom out’ dynamically according to the proposed ‘5G-ZOOM-Game’ algorithm. Different frequency sets are assigned to small cells based on adjacency for reducing interference. In the proposed approach femtocells are used as small cells. The proposed algorithm is applied between two adjacent femtocells. Out of two adjacent femtocells, higher majority femtocell is selected based on weighted majority game; this femtocell zooms its coverage area. The utility function of the proposed approach is defined to connect maximum possible number of mobile devices by increasing the higher majority femtocell’s coverage area. Higher majority femtocell is chosen based on the load and minimum distance between mobile device and femtocell base station. Proposed 5G-ZOOM-Game network reduces ~ 35% of power consumption and increases signal-to-interference-plus-noise-ratio (SINR) and spectral efficiency by ~ 30% and ~ 60% respectively than the existing approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agiwal, M., Roy, A., & Saxena, N. (2016). Next generation 5G wireless networks: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials,18(3), 1617–1655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mukherjee, A., Bhattacherjee, S., Pal, S., & De, D. (2013). Femtocell based green power consumption methods for mobile network. Computer Networks,57(1), 162–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hsu, C. C., & Chang, J. M. (2017). Spectrum-energy efficiency optimization for downlink LTE-A for heterogeneous networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing,16(5), 1449–1461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gandotra, P., Jha, R. K., & Jain, S. (2017). Green communication in next generation cellular networks: A survey. IEEE Access,5, 11727–11758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mukherjee, A., Deb, P., & De, D. (2017). Small cell zooming based green congestion control in mobile network. CSI Transactions on ICT,5(1), 35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, H., Zhang, Q., & Zhao, F. (2016). Energy-efficient joint BS and RS sleep scheduling in relay-assisted cellular networks. Computer Networks,100, 45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Trestian, R., Ormond, O., & Muntean, G. M. (2012). Game theory-based network selection: Solutions and challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials,14(4), 1212–1231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Anglano, C., Guazzone, M., & Sereno, M. (2014). Maximizing profit in green cellular networks through collaborative games. Computer Networks,75, 260–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Matsui, T., & Matsui, Y. (2000). A survey of algorithms for calculating power indices of weighted majority games. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan,43(1), 71–86.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Littlestone, N., & Warmuth, M. K. (1994). The weighted majority algorithm. Information and Computation,108(2), 212–261.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Mukherjee, A., & De, D. (2017). User velocity based hand-off prediction in micro-femtocell clustered network. Computers & Electrical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2017.11.023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. De, D., & Mukherjee, A. (2017). Group handoff management in low power microcell-femtocell network. Digital Communications and Networks, 3(1), 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen, J., Wu, Y., Qian, L. P., Peng, H., & Zhou, H. (2017). Energy-efficient content distribution via mobile users cooperations in cellular networks. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications,10(3), 750–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Niu, Z., Wu, Y., Gong, J., & Yang, Z. (2010). Cell zooming for cost-efficient green cellular networks. IEEE Communications Magazine,48(11), 74–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Khamesi, A. R., & Zorzi, M. (2016). Energy and area spectral efficiency of cell zooming in random cellular networks. In global communications conference (GLOBECOM), 2016 IEEE (pp. 1–6). IEEE.

  16. Lateef, H. Y., Shakir, M. Z., Ismail, M., Mohamed, A., & Qaraqe, K. (2015). Towards energy efficient and quality of service aware cell zooming in 5G wireless networks. In vehicular technology conference (VTC Fall), 2015 IEEE 82nd (pp. 1–5). IEEE.

  17. Mishra, S., & Murthy, C. S. R. (2017). Efficient coverage management of pico cells in HetNets via spectrum slicing, cell biasing, and transmit power spreading. Wireless Networks. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-017-1525-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, C. Y., Ko, C. H., Wei, H. Y., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2016). A voting-based femtocell downlink cell-breathing control mechanism. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON),24(1), 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Balasubramaniam, R., Nagaraj, S., Sarkar, M., Paolini, C., & Khaitan, P. (2013). Cell zooming for power efficient base station operation. In 2013 9th international wireless communications and mobile computing conference (IWCMC), (pp. 556–560). IEEE.

  20. Chung, Y. L. (2015). An energy-saving small-cell zooming scheme for two-tier hybrid cellular networks. In 2015 international conference on information networking (ICOIN), (pp. 148–152). IEEE.

  21. Driouch, E., Ajib, W., & Assi, C. (2017). Power control and clustering in heterogeneous cellular networks. Wireless Networks,23(8), 2509–2520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lin, P. C., Casanova, L. F. G., & Lin, Y. C. (2017). Analytical framework for power saving evaluation in two-tier heterogeneous mobile networks. Wireless Networks,23(4), 985–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Samarakoon, S., Bennis, M., Saad, W., & Latva-aho, M. (2016). Dynamic clustering and on/off strategies for wireless small cell networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications,15(3), 2164–2178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu, J., Zhang, Y., Zukerman, M., & Yung, E. K. N. (2015). Energy-efficient base-stations sleep-mode techniques in green cellular networks: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials,17(2), 803–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bouras, C., & Diles, G. (2017). Energy efficiency in sleep mode for 5G femtocells. In wireless days, 2017 (pp. 143–145). IEEE.

  26. Liu, Q., & Shi, J. (2018). Base station sleep and spectrum allocation in heterogeneous ultra-dense networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 98(4), 3611–3627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mukherjee, A., Deb, P., & De, D. (2015). Green deployment strategy of different generation mobile networks based on spectrum analysis. In: 2015 third international conference on computer, communication, control and information technology (C3IT), (pp. 1–6). IEEE.

  28. Mukherjee, A., De, D., & Deb, P. (2016). Interference management in macro-femtocell and micro-femtocell cluster-based long-term evaluation-advanced green mobile network. IET Communications,10(5), 468–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mukherjee, A., & De, D. (2018). Octopus algorithm for wireless personal communications., Wireless Personal Communications Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang, H., Jiang, C., Beaulieu, N. C., Chu, X., Wang, X., & Quek, T. Q. (2015). Resource allocation for cognitive small cell networks: A cooperative bargaining game theoretic approach. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications,14(6), 3481–3493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang, H., Du, J., Cheng, J., Long, K., & Leung, V. C. (2018). Incomplete CSI based resource optimization in SWIPT enabled heterogeneous networks: A non-cooperative game theoretic approach. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications,17(3), 1882–1892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Alvarez, P., Galiotto, C., van de Belt, J., Finn, D., Ahmadi, H., & DaSilva, L. (2015). Simulating dense small cell networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1510.02743.

  33. Pérez-Romero, J., Sallent, O., Ahmadi, H., & Macaluso, I. (2016). On modeling channel selection in LTE-U as a repeated game. In wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC), 2016 IEEE (pp. 1–6). IEEE.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Department of Science and Technology (DST) for DST-FIST, Reference No.: SR/FST/ETI-296/2011.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Subha Ghosh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghosh, S., De, D., Deb, P. et al. 5G-ZOOM-Game: small cell zooming using weighted majority cooperative game for energy efficient 5G mobile network. Wireless Netw 26, 349–372 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-018-1818-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-018-1818-9

Keywords

Navigation