Abstract
When a group of Mobile Users (MUs) equipped with multi-mode or multi-home terminals, like passengers on board a bus or a train or a car, moves from one wireless network (WN) to another WN within a heterogeneous wireless network (HWN) environment, request vertical handoffs simultaneously, a group vertical handoff (GVHO) occurs. In literature, the prevailing research work is mainly concerned for forced GVHO with network aspects like signal strength and bandwidth etc. while in reality the user initiated GVHO with the user aspects like price, power consumption and velocity etc. along with their respective user preferences is more important for performing vertical handoffs in HWNs. In user initiated GVHO, selection of the mutually best WN-MU pair which can maximise network revenue of constituent WN as well as user satisfaction of MU in a group while minimising the simultaneous selection of a WN by multiple MU of the group is a challenging problem. This paper proposes a GVHO decision model based on non-cooperative game which utilizes multiple handoff decision attributes and their respective user preferences calculated dynamically on real-time basis as the game strategies to select the best available WNs by group MUs at NASH equilibrium for vertical handoffs. The performance of the proposed model is evaluated in terms of number of GVHOs, price of anarchy and price of stability for both group of MUs and WNs. The simulation results show that the proposed model results in minimum number of GVHOs as compared to existing GVHO models and maximisation of user satisfaction and network revenue.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Goyal, P., Lobiyal, D. K., & Katti, C. P. (2018). Dynamic user preference based network selection for vertical handoff in heterogeneous wireless networks. Wireless Personal Communications,98(1), 725–742.
Goyal, P., Lobiyal, D. K., & Katti, C. P. (2017). Vertical handoff in heterogeneous wireless networks: A tutorial. In International Conference on Computing, Communication and Automation (ICCCA2017) (pp. 551–556).
Goyal, P., & Saxena, S. (2008). A dynamic decision model for vertical handoffs across heterogeneous wireless networks. In World academy of science, engineering and technology (Vol. 31, No. July, pp. 677–682).
Wang, L., & Kuo, G.-S. G. S. (2013). Mathematical modeling for network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks—A tutorial. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials,15(1), 271–292.
Cai, X., & Liu, F. (2008). Network selection for group handover in multi-access networks. In IEEE international conference on communications (pp. 2164–2168).
Lei, S., Hui, T., & Zheng, H. (2010). Group vertical handover in heterogeneous radio access networks. In IEEE vehicular technology conference (pp. 1–5).
Sun, L., Tian, H., & Zhang, P. (2012). Decision-making models for group vertical handover in vehicular communications. Telecommunication Systems,50(4), 257–266.
Walid, A., El Kamili, M., Kobbane, A., Mabrouk, A., Sabir, E., & El Koutbi, M. (2014). A decentralized network selection algorithm for group vertical handover in heterogeneous networks. IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, WCNC,3, 2817–2821.
Taleb, T., Mohammed, E. K., Walid, A., Kobbane, A., Mabrouk, A., & Sabir, E. (2015). Group vertical handoff management in heterogeneous networks. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing,2015, 421–430.
Sastry, P. S., Phansalkar, V. V., & Thathachar, M. A. L. (1994). Decentralized learning of Nash equilibria in multi-person stochastic games with incomplete information. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics,24(5), 769–777.
Ghahfarokhi, B. S., & Movahhedinia, N. (2013). A personalized QoE-aware handover decision based on distributed reinforcement learning. Wireless Networks,19(8), 1807–1828.
Busetti, F. (2003). Simulated annealing overview. In World Wide Web. www.geocities.com/. (no. 1, pp. 1–10).
Mahardhika, G., Ismail, M., & Nordin, R. (2015). Vertical handover decision algorithm using multicriteria metrics in heterogeneous wireless network. SAC,2015, 720–721.
Qental, N. C., & da Silva Gonҫalves, P. A. (2014). A policy for group handover. International Journal on Advances in Networks and Services,7(3–4), 183–193.
Nash, J. (1951). Non-cooperative games. The Annals of Mathematics,54(2), 286.
Goyal, P., Lobiyal, D. K., & Katti, C. P. (2018). Game theory for vertical handoff decisions in heterogeneous wireless networks: A tutorial. In S. Bhattacharyya, T. Gandhi, K. Sharma, & P. Dutta (Eds.), Advanced computational and communication paradigms (1st ed.). Sikkim: Springer.
Lemke, C. E., & Howson, J. T. (1964). Equilibrium points of bimatrix games. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics,12(2), 413–423.
Buttler, J., & Akchurina, N. (2013). Nash equilibria in normal games via optimization methods. In 2013 European control conference (ECC).
Petty, M. D. (2012). Calculating and using confidence intervals for model validation. In Proceedings of a meeting fall on simulation interoperability work (2012 Fall SIW) (pp. 10–14).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goyal, P., Lobiyal, D.K. & Katti, C.P. Dynamic user preference based group vertical handoffs in heterogeneous wireless networks: a non-cooperative game approach. Wireless Netw 26, 775–789 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-018-1826-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-018-1826-9