Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Use of BIM technology and impact on productivity in construction project management

  • Published:
Wireless Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Building information modelling is a illustration of the physical and functional characteristics of a technology which connects project information databases in every fields. Use of building information modelling technology represents one of the most progressive approach in construction project management. Construction project management is a difficult process depends on many factors. Human resources are one of them. Project results depends on productivity of human resources. There are some questions about productivity of employees and managers. Productivity of employees depends on many processes and factors. Progressive technology can be one of them. BIM technology presents probably affective tool for productivity. This research discussed issue of use of BIM technology and analyses BIM effect on productivity in construction project management. Main aim of research was set like analyze of use BIM technology in construction industry and effect of this on productivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Knapčíková, L., et al. (2018). Advanced materials based on the Recycled Polyvinyl Butyral (PVB). In MMS Conference 2017. EAI, Ghent (pp. 1–9).

  2. Knapčíková, L., et al. (2016). Material recycling of some automobile plastics waste. Przemysl Chemiczny, 95(9), 1716–1720.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mesároš, P., Behúnová, A., Mandičák, T., & Behún, M. (2019). Impact of enterprise information systems on selected key performance indicators in construction project management—an empirical study. Wireless Networks. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-019-02048-w.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Krajníková, K., Smetanková, J., & Behúnová, A. (2019). Green buildings and building information modelling. Strojárstvo Extra, 23(9), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Koľveková, G., et al. (2019). Regional tourism clustering based on the three Ps of the sustainability services marketing matrix: An example of central and eastern European countries. Sustainability, 11(2), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Behún, M., et al. (2018). The impact of the manufacturing industry on the economic cycle of European Union countries. Journal of Competitiveness, 10(1), 23–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ahmadian, F. F. A., Rashidi, T. H., Akbarnezhad, A., & Waller, A. S. T. (2017). BIM-enabled sustainability assessment of material supply decisions. Engineering Constructustion Architect Management, 24, 668–695. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-12-2015-0193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jung, Y., & Joo, M. (2011). Building information modelling (BIM) framework for practical implementation. Automatization in Construction, 20(2), 126–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.09.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Howard, R., & Björk, B. C. (2008). Building information modelling—experts’ views on standardization and industry deployment. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 22(2), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2007.03.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Karshenas, S., & Niknam, M. (2013). Ontology-based building information modeling. In 2013 ASCE international workshop on computing in civil engineering, IWCCE 2013, Los Angeles, CA (pp. 476–483).

  11. Bradley, A., Haijiang Li, H., Lark, R., & Dunn, S. (2016). BIM for infrastructure: An overall review and constructor perspective. Automatization in Constriction, 71, 139–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Olawumi, T. O., Chan, D. W. M., & Wong, J. K. W. (2017). Evolution in the intellectual structure of BIM research: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 23(8), 1060–1081. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2017.1374301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Alsayyar, B., & Jrade, A. (2015). Integrating building information modeling (BIM) with sustainable universal design strategies to evaluate the costs and benefits of building projects. In Proceedings of the 5th international/11th construction specialty conference (pp. 1–10).

  14. Olawumia, T. O., Chana, D. W. M., Wongb, J. K. W., & Chana, A. P. C. (2018). Barriers to the integration of BIM and sustainability practices in construction projects: A Delphi survey of international experts. Journal of Building Engineering, 20, 60–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gilkinson, N., Raju, P., Kiviniemi, A., Chapman, C., Raju, P., & Chapman, C. (2015). Building information modelling: the tide is turning. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Structures and Buildings, 168, 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1680/stbu.12.00045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Olatunji, S. O., Olawumi, T. O., & Awodele, O. A. (2017). Achieving value for money (VFM) in construction projects. Journal of Civil and Environmental Research-International Institute for Science, Technology and Education (IISTE), 9, 54–64.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Olawumi, T. O., & Chan, D. W. M. (2018). Identifying and prioritizing the benefits of integrating BIM and sustainability practices in construction projects: A Delphi survey of international experts. Sustainable Cities and Society, 40, 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.03.033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shashank, K., Hazra, Sutapa, & Nath Pal, K. (2014). Analysis of key factors affecting the variation of labour productivity in construction projects. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 4(5), 152–160.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Neely, A., Adams, C., & Kenerley, M. (2002). The performance prism: The scorecard for measuring and management business success. London: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Furneaux, C., et al. (2000). Australian Construction Industry KPIs. ResearchGate.

  21. Sibiya, M., Aigbavboa, C., & Thwala, W. (2014). Construction projects’ key performance indicators: A case of the South Africa construction industry.

  22. Karslon, K. (2019). 12 Business metric that every company should know. Retrieved November 3, 2019, from https://www.scoro.com/blog/12-business-metrics.

  23. Gerber, B. (2018). 12 Key financial performance indicators you should be tracking. Retrieved November 3, 2019, from https://www.accountingdepartment.com/blog/12-key-performance-indicators-you-should-be-tracking.

  24. Wiliams, A. (2017). 11 Key business performance metrics for metrics better operations. Retrieved November 3, 2019, from https://alistemarketing.com/blog/business-performance-metrics.

  25. Jackson, T. (2018). 18 Key performance indicator (KPI) examples defined. Retrieved November 3, 2019, from https://www.clearpointstrategy.com/18-key-performance-indicators/.

  26. Taber, K. (2017). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science. Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under the contract no. APVV-17-0549. The paper presents a partial research results of project VEGA 1/088/17 “Research and application of knowledge-based systems for modeling cost and economic parameters in Building Information Modeling”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annamária Behúnová.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mesároš, P., Mandičák, T. & Behúnová, A. Use of BIM technology and impact on productivity in construction project management. Wireless Netw 28, 855–862 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-020-02302-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-020-02302-6

Keywords

Navigation