Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

An event-driven energy-efficient routing protocol for water quality sensor networks

  • Published:
Wireless Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to the limited resources of water quality sensor networks, how to design a routing protocol which can prolong the network life cycle is one of a research hotspots. In this paper, according to the event level and the node energy of the sensor networks, the nodes’ types are defined, which can help to determine the cluster node. Then, an event driven routing protocol (EDRP) is proposed, which considers the event information and the remaining energy of the whole network. Simulation results show that, compared with distributed energy-efficient clustering algorithm, EDRP can reduce the overall energy consumption of the network by 138–172%, based on different kinds of events. Besides, EDRP can effectively prolong the life cycle and greatly increase the amount of data transmission of the network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pan, Y., & Liu, G. (2019). Characteristics and applications of wireless sensor networks. Electronic Technology & Software Engineering, 2019(4), 2095–5650.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Guevara, J., Barrero, F., Vargas, E., Becerra, J., & Toral, S. (2012). Environmental wireless sensor network for road traffic applications. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 6(2), 177–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang, C., Guo, S., & Yang, Y. (2016). An optimization framework for mobile data collection in energy-harvesting wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 15(12), 2969–2986.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Martinez, K., Hart, J. K., & Ong, R. (2004). Environmental sensor networks. IEEE Computer Society, 37(8), 50–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yahya, A., Islam, S., Akhunzada, A., Ahmed, G., Shamshirband, S., & Lloret, J. (2018). Towards efficient sink mobility in underwater wireless sensor networks. Energies, 11, 1471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Al-Jaoufi, M. A. A., Liu, Y., & Zhang, Z. J. (2018). An active defense model with low power consumption and deviation for wireless sensor networks utilizing evolutionary game theory. Energies, 11, 1281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shehadeh, H. A., Idris, M. Y. I., Ahmedy, I., Ramli, R., & Noor, N. M. (2018). The multi-objective optimization algorithm based on sperm fertilization procedure (MOSFP) method for solving wireless sensor networks optimization problems in smart grid applications. Energies, 11, 97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, Y. (2018). Routing technology overview of wireless sensor networks. Computer Knowledge and Technology, 14(23), 50–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jia, H., Fan, X., & Lv, Y. (2018). Energy efficient clustering routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. Transducer and Microsystem Technologies, 37(8), 116–119.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shen, B., Zhang, S., & Zhong, Y. (2006). Clustering routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. Journal of Software, 2006(7), 1588–1600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Habibi, J., Ghrayeb, A., & Aghdam, A. G. (2013). Energy-efficient cooperative routing in wireless sensor networks: A mixed-integer optimization framework and explicit solution. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 61(8), 3424–3437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sharma, D., & Bhondekar, A. P. (2018). Traffic and energy aware routing for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. IEEE Communications Letters, 22(8), 1558–2558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lai, X. , & Wang, H. (2018). RNOB: Receiver negotiation opportunity broadcast protocol for trustworthy data dissemination in wireless sensor networks. In Special section on internet-of-things (IOT) big data trust management (pp. 2169–3536). IEEE.

  14. Qing, L., Zhu, Q., & Wang, M. (2006). Design of a distributed energy-efficient clustering algorithm for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Computer Communications, 29(12), 2230–2237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu, J., & Hu, Y. (2014). A balanced and energy-efficient clustering algorithm for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. In 2014 6th conference on Wireless communications and signal processing (WCSP), Hefei (pp. 1–6). IEEE.

  16. Fang, W., & Hu, Y. (2018). Improved DEEC algorithm in wireless sensor networks. Journal of Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, 39(01), 66–70.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, X., & Dong, B. (2017). A reactive routing algorithms based on energy efficiency. Journal of Northeast Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 49(03), 68–72.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Che, W., Ou, L., Wang, H., & Li, J. (2002). Rainwater runoff quality and its main influencing factors in Beijing urban area. Technologies and Equipment for Enviro.poll.cont., 2002(01), 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bouraoui, M., & Meddeb, A. (2015). Optimal number of cluster heads for random topology WSNs using the stable election protocol. In Global summit on computer & information technology (GSCIT), Sousse (pp.1–5). IEEE.

  20. Deng, S. (2018). Research on optimizing cluster head selection and balancing network energy based on LEACH protocol (pp. 32–38). Shanghai: Shanghai Normal University.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Su, S., & Zhang, H. (2017). Adaptive clustering scheme for WSNs based on optimal cluster head node number. Control Engineering, 24(05), 1671–7848.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cheng, L. (2015). Research on cluster head election strategy and routing algorithm based on LEACH protocol in WSN (pp. 35–41). Hangzhou: Hangzhou University of Electronic Science and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant Nos. 61802010 and 61703008; and the Funds for basic scientific research of BTBU in 2019, Grant No. PXM2019_014213_000007.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Computer and Information Engineering, Beijing Technology and Business University, Haidian District, Beijing, 100048, China

    Xiaoyi Wang, Gongxue Cheng, Qian Sun, Jiping Xu, Huiyan Zhang, Jiabin Yu & Li Wang

Authors
  1. Xiaoyi Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gongxue Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qian Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jiping Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Huiyan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jiabin Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Li Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qian Sun.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, X., Cheng, G., Sun, Q. et al. An event-driven energy-efficient routing protocol for water quality sensor networks. Wireless Netw 26, 5855–5866 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-020-02320-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-020-02320-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation