Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Energy minimization by dynamic base station switching in heterogeneous cellular network

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Wireless Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

5G communication technologies are expected to provide high rate and low delay services. To meet the requirements, more base stations (BS), including macrocell BS (MacBS) and microcell BS (MicBS), have to be deployed. In this dense multi-tier heterogeneous networks, the user quality of service (QoS) can be significantly improved by shortening communication distance between base stations and users. However, the network energy consumptions of base stations have been growing quickly. How to save energy consumption in these dense layered network has become a problem we have to face. In this paper, we proposed a microcell BS (MicBS) switch algorithm to reduce the network energy consumption. The BS energy consumption is associated with traffic load, which is denoted as the number of users a BS serves. Considering the time-varying traffic load, we proposed a metric named coverage ratio to characterize how many users can enjoy the services. When the coverage ratio exceeds the upper threshold, a switch off algorithm is activated. MicBSs whose energy costs are higher than their economic profit will be switched off one by one. On the contrary, if this metric is below the lower threshold, a switch on algorithm is activated. A group of inactive MicBSs surrounded by multiple unserved users will be switched on simultaneously. After the switching operations, the network coverage ratio is expected to fall between the upper and lower bounds. Simulation results show that the coverage ratio is kept with the desired level. Compared to some existing algorithms, the proposed algorithm shows more flexible switching operation and more effective energy saving.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Note that the maximum transmission power of MacBS shown in the table is 100W. In the simulations, we have tried several power levels, such as 20W, 40W. According to the rules of 3GPP organization, wireless base stations are divided into four categories, namely macro base station, micro base station, pico base station and femto base station. The recommended power levels of single carrier transmission for based stations are above 10W. The typical power level of outdoor base station is about 43dBm (20W). However it depends on the coverage range and carrier frequency. For instance, to extend the coverage of base station or work at the higher transmission power is needed; while in the 5G applications, with the higher carrier frequency and high transmission rate requirement, the transmission power is also increased. China Mobile, for example, requires 64 channels with a maximum transmission power of 320 Watts for its 2.6GHz RF module to support high downlink speeds.

References

  1. Zhang, H., Liu, H., Cheng, J., & Leung, V. C. M. (2018). Downlink energy efficiency of power allocation and wireless backhaul bandwidth allocation in heterogeneous small cell networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 66(4), 1705–1716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu, Z., Gao, L., Liu, Y., Guan, X., Ma, K., & Wang, Y. (2020). Efficient QoS support for robust resource allocation in blockchain-based femtocell networks. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 16(11), 7070–7080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Auer, G., Blume, O., Giannini, V., Godor, I., Imran, M., Jading, Y., Katranaras, E., Olsson, M., Sabella, D., & Skillermark , P. et al. (2010). D2.3: energy efficiency analysis of the reference systems, areas of improvements and target breakdown. INFSO-ICTB247733 EARTH (Energy Aware Radio Network Technoledge), pp. 39–49.

  4. Xu, Y., Xie, H., Wu, Q., Huang, C., & Yuen, C. (2022). Robust max-min energy efficiency for RIS-aided hetnets with distortion noises. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 70(2), 1457–1471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xu, Y., Gui, G., Gacanin, H., & Adachi, F. (2021). A survey on resource allocation for 5G heterogeneous networks: Current research, future trends, and challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 23(2), 668–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu, Z., Liang, C., Yuan, Y., Chan, K., & Guan, X. (2021). Resource allocation based on user pairing and subcarrier matching for downlink non-orthogonal multiple access networks. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatic Sinica, 8(3), 670–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhao, C., Han, J., Ding, X., & Yang, F. (2020) A novel approach of dynamic base station switching strategy based on markov decision process for interference alignment in VANETs, Wireless Networks, pp. 1–18.

  8. Lassila, P., Gebrehiwot, E. M., & Aalto, S. (2019). Optimal energy-aware load balancing and base station switch-off control in 5G hetnets. Computer Networks, 159, 10–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Xu, Y., Xie, H., Liang, C., & Yu, F. R. (2021). Robust secure energy efficiency optimization in SWIPT-aided heterogeneous networks with a non-linear energy harvesting model. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8(19), 14 908-14 919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wu, J., Zhang, Y., Zukerman, M., & Yung, E. K. (2015). Energy-efficient base-stations sleep-mode techniques in green cellular networks: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, 17(2), 803–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Peng, J., Hong, P., & Xue, K. (2014). Stochastic analysis of optimal base station energy saving in cellular networks with sleep mode. IEEE Communications Letters, 18(4), 612–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, Z., Zhu, H., Yuan, Y., Yang, Y., & Chan, K. Y. (2020). Optimization of base station density and user transmission power in multi-tier heterogeneous cellular systems. Computer Communications, 161, 334–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee, S. H., & Sohn, I. (2015). Affinity propagation for energy-efficient BS operations in green cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 14(8), 4534–4545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ben Rached, N., Ghazzai, H., Kadri, A., & Alouini, M. (2018). A time-varied probabilistic on/off switching algorithm for cellular networks. IEEE Communications Letters, 22(3), 634–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim, J., Lee, H., & Chong, S. (2018). Traffic-aware energy-saving base station sleeping and clustering in cooperative networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 17(2), 1173–1186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Beitelmal, T., Szyszkowicz, S. S., Gonzlez, D. G., & Yanikomeroglu, H. (2018). Sector and site switch-off regular patterns for energy saving in cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 17(5), 2932–2945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Panahi, F. H., Panahi, F. H., Hattab, G., Ohtsuki, T., & Cabric, D. (2018). Green heterogeneous networks via an intelligent sleep/wake-up mechanism and D2D communications. IEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking, 2(4), 915–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yu, N., Miao, Y., Mu, L., Du, H., Huang, H., & Jia, X. (2016). Minimizing energy cost by dynamic switching on/off base stations in cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 15(11), 7457–7469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Amine, A.E., Chaiban, J.P., Hassan, H.A.H., Dini, P., Nuaymi, L., & Achkar, R. (2022). Energy optimization with multi-sleeping control in 5g heterogeneous networks using reinforcement learning, IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, early access, https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSM.2022.3157650.

  20. Oh, E., Son, K., & Krishnamachari, B. (2013). Dynamic base station switching-on/off strategies for green cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 12(5), 2126–2136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ajmone Marsan, M., Chiaraviglio, L., Ciullo, D., & Meo, M. (2009) Optimal energy savings in cellular access networks, in 2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops, pp. 1–5.

  22. Dahal, M. S., Shrestha, J. N., & Shakya, S. R. (2018). Energy saving technique and measurement in green wireless communication. Energy, 159, 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tabassum, H., Siddique, U., Hossain, E., & Hossain, M. J. (2014). Downlink performance of cellular systems with base station sleeping, user association, and scheduling. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 13(10), 5752–5767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu, Z., Xie, Y., Chan, K., & Guan, X. (2019). Chance-constrained optimization in d2d-based vehicular communication network. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 68(5), 5045–5058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ignacio, G., Bo, Y., Shuai, Z., & Yu, C. (2021). Optimization of base station on-off switching with a machine learning approach, in ICC 2021-IEEE International Conference on Communications, pp. 1–6.

  26. Marcin, H., Adrian, K., Pawel, K., & Koudouridis, G. P. (2020). A reinforcement learning approach for base station on/off switching in heterogeneous m-mimo networks, in 2020 IEEE 21st International Symposium on A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM), pp. 170–172.

  27. Haenggi, M. (2012). Stochastic geometry for wireless networks. Cambridge: Cambridge Press.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Yuanai, X., Zhixin, L., Yan, C. K., & Xinping, G. (2020). Energy-spectral efficiency optimization in vehicular communications: Joint clustering and pricing-based robust power control approach. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 69(11), 13 673-13 685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Andrews, J. G., Baccelli, F., & Ganti, R. K. (2011). A tractable approach to coverage and rate in cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 59(11), 3122–3134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant 62273298, 61873223, the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province under grant F2019203095, Provincial Key Laboratory Performance Subsidy Project under grant 22567612H.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhixin Liu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Y., Liu, Z., Zhu, H. et al. Energy minimization by dynamic base station switching in heterogeneous cellular network. Wireless Netw 29, 669–684 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-022-03167-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-022-03167-7

Keywords

Navigation