Skip to main content
Log in

Capacity and Complexity Trade-offs in MIMO Analog–Digital Combining Systems

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Analog–digital combining is an alternative solution to decrease the hardware complexity of an all-digital combining system. We analyze the analog weights from the perspectives of maximizing analog signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and effective channel capacity \({(\tilde{C})}\). We propose simple sub-optimal algorithms to calculate receive analog weights in both open loop (OL) and closed loop (CL) systems, and compare the proposed schemes with an all-digital combining system, in terms of \({\tilde{C}}\). For both criteria, a small number of additional antennas is required to achieve the same mean capacity as an all-digital combining system in an urban micro model, e.g., 1 additional antenna in selection diversity and combining is required to achieve the same capacity as in a 2 ×  4 all-digital CL system at low SNR. The additional number of antennas is smaller in CL than in OL. The effective channel capacity based on the SNR maximization criterion is similar to that based on the \({\tilde{C}}\) maximization criterion, but the computational complexity the analog weights calculation is lower for the SNR maximization criterion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Winters J. H. (1987) On the capacity of radio communication systems with diversity in a Rayleigh fading environment. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 5(5): 871–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Foschini G. J., Gans M. J. (1998) On limits of wireless communications in a fading environment when using ultiple antennas. Wireless Personal Communications 6(3): 311–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sandhu, S., & Ho, M. (2003). Analog combining of multiple receive antennas with OFDM. IEEE international conference on communications (Vol. 5, pp. 3428–3432).

  4. Donovan, D. (2007). Managing cost issues in femtocell home base station design. Part 1. RF Design Line, http://www.rfdesignline.com/howto/201806254. Document accessed: Feb 2009.

  5. Analog-to-digital converter ICs, In: Analog Devices Solutions Bulletins, Vol. 7, Issue no. 3, http://www.analog.com/static/imported-files/solutions_bulletins/SB_V7ADC_4-07.pdf. Document accessed Feb. 2009.

  6. Arnold, H. (2008). SiGe semiconductor: RF front-ends enable wireless multimedia. EE Times Europe, http://eetimes.eu/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=206100348. Document accessed: Feb 2009.

  7. Heath, R. W. Jr., Sandhu, S., & Paulraj, A. (2001). Antenna selection for spatial multiplexing systems based on minimum error rate. Proceedings of IEEE international control conference (Vol. 7, pp. 2276–2280).

  8. Molisch A. F., Win M. Z., Choi Y. -S., Winters J. H. (2005) Capacity of MIMO systems with antenna selection. IEEE Transaction on Wireless Commununication 4(4): 1759–1772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bölcskei, H., Gesbert, D., Papadias C. B., & van der Veen, A.-J. (Eds.). (2006) Beamforming techniques. In space-time wireless systems: From array processing to MIMO communications (pp. 23–43). Cambridge: Cambridge Press.

  10. Brunner, C., Hammerschmidt, J. S., Seeger, A., & Nossek, J. A. (2000). Space-time eigenrake and downlink eigenbeamformer: Exploiting long-term and short-term channel properties in WCDMA. Proceedings of IEEE global telecommunication on conference, San Francisco, CA (Vol. 1, pp. 138–142).

  11. Paulraj A., Nabar R., Gore D. (2003) Introduction to space-time wireless communications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  12. Monzingo R. A., Miller T. W. (1980) Introduction to adaptive arrays. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  13. Strang G. (2003) Introduction to linear algebra. Wellesley Cambridge, Wellesley

    Google Scholar 

  14. Villard, G. (2001–2002). Compuatation of the inverse and determinant of a matrix. Algorithms Project’s Seminar, 29–32.

  15. Salo, J., Galdo, G. D., Salmi, J., Kyösti, P., Milojevic, P., Laselva, D., & Schneider, C. (2005). MATLAB implementation of the 3GPP spatial channel model (3GPP TR 25.996), On-line, http://www.tkk.fi/Units/Radio/scm/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xin Zhou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhou, X., Winters, J.H., Eggers, P.C.F. et al. Capacity and Complexity Trade-offs in MIMO Analog–Digital Combining Systems. Wireless Pers Commun 54, 685–698 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-009-9775-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-009-9775-3

Keywords

Navigation