Skip to main content
Log in

A Two-State Markov-Based Wireless Error Model for Bluetooth Networks

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data transmission over wireless networks is challenging due to the occurrence of burst errors, and packet loss caused by such errors seriously limits the maximum achievable throughput of wireless networks. To tailor efficient transmission schemes, it is essential to develop a wireless error model that can provide insight into the behavior of wireless transmissions. In this study, we investigate the wireless error model of Bluetooth networks. We study the FHSS feature of Bluetooth using both ordinary hopping kernels and Adaptive Frequency Hopping (AFH) kernels, and design analytical error models accordingly to capture the channel behavior of Bluetooth networks. We evaluate the proposed models by comparing the analytical results to the simulation results obtained by Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms. The results show that our analytical models can represent the channel behavior of Bluetooth networks in all test cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bluetooth specifications v1.1. http://www.bluetooth.com.

  2. Bamahdi, O. A., & Zummo, S. A. (2006). An adaptive frequency hopping technique with application to Bluetooth-WLAN coexistence. In International conference on networking, international Conference on Systems and International Conference on Mobile Communications and Learning Technologies (pp. 131–135).

  3. Chek M. C.-H., Kwok Y.-K. (2007) Design and evaluation of practical coexistence management schemes for Bluetooth and IEEE 802.11b systems. Computer Networks 51(8): 2086–2103

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, A. M., & Rao, R. R. (1999). Wireless channel models—Coping with complexity (Vol. 15, pp. 271–288). Berlin: Springer

  5. Conti A., Dardari D., Pasolini G., Andrisano O. (2003) Bluetooth and ieee 802.11b coexistence: Analytical performance evaluationin fading channels. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 21(2): 259–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cover T. M., Thomas J. A. (1991) Elements of information theory. Wiley, London

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Elliott E. O. (1963) Estimates of error rates for codes on burst-error channels. Bell System Technical Journal 42: 1977–1997

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gilbert E. (1960) Capacity of a burst-noise channel. Bell System Technical Journal 39: 1253–1266

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Golmie, N. (2000). Modeling and simulation of MAC protocols for wireless devices: Coexistence performance evaluation. In OPNETWORK Conference. IEEE.

  10. Golmie N. (2004) Bluetooth dynamic scheduling and interference mitigation. Mobile Networks and Applications 9(1): 21–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Golmie, N., Chevrollier, N., & Elbakkouri, I. (2001). Interference aware Bluetooth packet scheduling. In IEEE GLOBECOM (pp. 2857–2863).

  12. Golmie N., Chevrollier N., Rebala O. (2003) Bluetooth and WLAN coexistence: Challenges and solutions. IEEE Wireless Communications Magazine 10(6): 22–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. IEEE 802.11, the working group setting the standards for wireless LANs. http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/.

  14. IEEE 802.15 WPAN task group 2 (TG2). http://www.ieee802.org/15/pub/TG2.html.

  15. IEEE 802.15.4 WPAN-LR task group. http://www.ieee802.org/15/pub/TG4.html.

  16. Kanal L., Sastry A. (1978) Models for channels with memory and their applications to error control. IEEE Proceedings 66(7): 724–744

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Khayam, S. A., & Radha, H. (2006). Constant-complexity models for wireless channels. In IEEE Infocom.

  18. Krishnamoorthy, S., Robert, M., Srikanteswara, S., Anderson, M. V. C., & Reed, J. (2002). Channel frame error rate for bluetooth in the presence of microwave ovens. In IEEE VTC Fall.

  19. Lansford J., Stephens A., Nevo R. (2001) Wi-fi (802.11b) and bluetooth: Enabling coexistence. IEEE Network 15(5): 20–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Popovski P., Yomo H., Prasad R. (2006) Strategies for adaptive frequency hopping in the unlicensed bands. IEEE Wireless Communications 13(6): 60–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rondeay T. W., D’Souza M. F., Sweeney D. G. (2004) Residential microwave oven interference on Bluetooth data performance. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics 50(3): 856–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Treister, B., Gan, H. B., Chen, K., Chen, H. K., & Eliezer, A. B. O. (2001). Adaptive frequency hopping non-collaborative coexistence mechanism. Technical report, IEEE 802.15-01/252r0.

  23. Zorzi, M., Rao, R. R., & Milstein L. B. (1995). On the accuracy of a first-order markov model for data block transmissionon fading channels. In IEEE International Conference on Universal Personal Communications (pp. 211–215).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ling-Jyh Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, LJ., Hung, HH. A Two-State Markov-Based Wireless Error Model for Bluetooth Networks. Wireless Pers Commun 58, 657–668 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-009-9899-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-009-9899-5

Keywords

Navigation