Skip to main content
Log in

The Performance Analysis of the Multicast Extension Support for Proxy MIPv6

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mobile multicast is based on the traditional multicast protocols and the mobility support protocols to provide the multicast services for the mobile subscribers. Several mobile multicast methods were proposed in the past few years, but most of them are based on Mobile IPv6 and its variants which require the mobile node to support the mobility function. Recently, Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) was proposed to provide the mobility support for the mobile node with or without mobility function, and the previous studies have shown that PMIPv6 can improve the performance in term of the handover performance and protocol cost. However, PMIPv6 mainly concerns on the mobility support for unicast routing and little considers the multicast routing. In this paper, we propose two multicast methods called the MAG (Mobile Access Gateway)-based method and LMA (Local Mobility Anchor)-based method based on the different multicast delivery transmission path to extend PMIPv6, and analyze their performance under the different scenarios. The analytical results show that the LMA-based method is suitable for the higher speed, bigger domain size, and larger network topology scenarios, whereas the MAG-based method is suitable for the lower speed, smaller domain size and smaller network topology scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Romdhani I., Kellil M., Lach H.Y. et al (2004) IP mobile multicast: Challenges and solutions. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 6(1): 18–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Johnson, D., Perkins, C., & Arkko, J. (2004). Mobility support in IPv6. RFC 3775. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3775.txt. Accessed 7 Nov 2011.

  3. Koodli, R. et al. (2005). Fast handover for mobile IPv6. RFC 4068. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4068.txt. Accessed 7 Nov 2011.

  4. Soliman, H., Castelluccia, C., El Malki, K., & Bellier, L. (2005). Hierarchical mobile IPv6 mobility management (HMIPv6). RFC 4140. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4140.txt. Accessed 7 Nov 2011.

  5. Xia, F., & Sarikaya, B. (2007). FMIPv6 extension for multicast handover. draft-xia-mipshop-fmip-multicast-01. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xia-mipshop-fmip-multicast-01. Accessed 7 Nov 2011.

  6. Georgios A., Leoleis G. A. (2006) Seamless multicast mobility support using fast MIPv6 extensions. Computer Communications 29(18): 3745–3765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kwon, D. H. et al. (2006). Design and implementation of an efficient multicast support scheme for FMIPv6. In Proceeding of IEEE INFOCOMM 2006, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain.

  8. Schmidt, T. C., & Waehlisch, M. (2005). Seamless multicast handover in a hierarchical mobile IPv6 environment (M-HMIPv6). Draft-schmidt-waehlisch-mhmipv6-04. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-schmidt-waehlisch-mhmipv6-04. Accessed 7 Nov 2011.

  9. Zhang, H. K., Guan, J. F. et al. (2007). Mobile IPv6 multicast with dynamic multicast agent. Draft-zhang-mipshop-multicast-dma-03. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-mipshop-multicast-dma-03. Accessed 7 Nov 2011.

  10. Schmidt, T. C., Waehlisch, M., & Fairhurst, G. (2010). Multicast mobility in mobile IP Version 6 (MIPv6): Problem statement and brief survey. RFC 5757. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5757.txt. Accessed 7 Nov 2011.

  11. Li, X., Guan, J. F., Zhang, H. K. et al. (2009). The implementation and performance analysis of mobile multicast in WLAN environments. In Proceeding of CyberC 2009 (pp. 95–101).

  12. Gundavelli, S., Leung, K., Devarapalli, V. et al. (2008). Proxy mobile IPv6. RFC 5213.

  13. Guan J.F., Zhou H.C., Yan Z.W. et al (2011) Implementation and analysis of proxy MIPv6. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing 11(4): 477–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fu, X. M., & Lei, J. (2007). Evaluating the benefits of introducing PMIPv6 for localized mobility management. Technical Report, No. IFI-TB-2007-02.

  15. Zhou H. C., Zhang H. K., Qin Y. J. (2007) A fast handover scheme of PMIPv6 and performance analysis. Journal of Internet Technology 8(4): 535–543

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kong, K. S., Lee, W., Han, Y. H. et al. (2008). Handover latency analysis of a network-based localized mobility management protocol. In Proceeding of IEEE ICC’08 (pp. 5838–5843).

  17. Bernardos C. J., Gramaglia M., Contreras L. M., Calderon M., Soto I. (2010) Network-based localized IP mobility management: Proxy mobile IPv6 and current trends in standardization. Journal of Wireless Mobile Networks Ubiquitous Computing and Dependable Applications 1(2/3): 16–35

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yan Z. W., Zhou H. C., You I. (2010) N-NEMO: A comprehensive network mobility solution in proxy mobile IPv6 network. Journal of Wireless Mobile Networks Ubiquitous Computing and Dependable Applications 1(2/3): 52–70

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang, H. K., Guan, J. F. et al. (2008). Multicast routing in proxy mobile IPv6. Draft-zhang-netlmm-pmipv6-mcast-00. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-netlmm-pmipv6-mcast-00. Accessed 7 Nov 2011.

  20. Zhao, Y. K., & Seite, P. (2009). The solution for PMIPv6 multicast service. Draft-zhao-multimob pmip6-solution-03. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhao-multimob-pmip6-solution-03. Accessed 7 Nov 2011.

  21. Asaeda, H., Seite, P., & Xia, J. (2009). PMIPv6 extensions for multicast. Draft-asaeda-multimob-pmip6-extension-02. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-asaeda-multimob-pmip6-extension-02. Accessed 7 Nov 2011.

  22. Schmidt, T. C., Waehlisch, M., & Krishnan, S. (2010). Base deployment for multicast listener support in PMIPv6 domains. Draft-ietf-multimob-pmipv6-base-solution-05. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-multimob-pmipv6-base-solution-05. Accessed 7 Nov 2011.

  23. Hui, M., Chen, G., & Deng, H. (2010). Fast handover for multicast in proxy mobile IPv6. Draft-hui-multimob-fast-handover-02. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hui-multimob-fast-handover-02. Accessed 7 Nov 2011.

  24. Jeon, S., & Kim, Y. (2010). Mobile multicasting support in proxy mobile IPv6. Draft-sijeon-multimob-mms-pmip6-02. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sijeon-multimob-mms-pmip6-02. Accessed 7 Nov 2011.

  25. Krishnan, S., Sarikaya, B., & Schmidt, T. C. (2009). Proxy mobile IPv6 basic multicast support solution. Draft-krishnan-multimob-pmip6basicmcast-solution-00. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-krishnan-multimob-pmip6basicmcast-solution-00. Accessed 7 Nov 2011.

  26. Li, Y., Chen W., Su, L., et al. (2009). Proxy mobile IPv6 based multicast listener mobility architecture. In Proceeding of WCNC 2009 (pp. 2085–2090).

  27. Kim, Y.-T., & Han, S.-J. (2009). Proxy mobile IP extension for mobile multimedia multicast services. In Proceeding of CCNC 2009 (pp. 308–312).

  28. Gohar, M., Koh, S. J., Um, T.-W., et al. (2010). Seamless multicast handover in PMIPv6-based wireless networks. In Proceeding of ICACT 2010 (pp. 502–507).

  29. Guan, J. F., Qin, Y. J., Gao, S., et al. (2009). The performance analysis of multicast in proxy mobile IPv6. In Proceeding of ICCTA 2009 (pp. 719–723).

  30. Guan, J. F., Zhou, H. C., Zhang, H. K., et al. (2010). Multicast extension support for proxy MIPv6. In Proceeding of CCNC 2010 (pp. 818–822).

  31. Kong K. S., Lee W. J., Han Y. H. et al (2008) Mobility management for All-IP mobile networks: Mobile IPv6 vs proxy mobile IPv6. IEEE Wireless Communications 15(2): 36–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Guan, J. F., Gao, S., Zhang, H. K., et al. (2009). The analysis and simulation of multicast join delay. In Proceeding of IC-NIDC2009 (pp. 217–221).

  33. Calhoun, P., Loughney, J., Guttman, E., et al. (2003). Diameter base protocol. RFC 3588.

  34. Schmidt, T. C., & Wahlisch, M. (2005). Analysis of handover frequencies for predictive, reactive and proxy schemes and their implications on IPv6 and multicast mobility. In Proceeding of ICN 2005, LNCS 3421 (pp. 1039–1046).

  35. Pack S., Kwon T., Choi Y. et al (2009) An adaptive network mobility support protocol in hierarchical mobile IPv6 networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 58(7): 3627–3639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lee J.-H., Ernst T., Chung T.-M. (2010) Cost analysis of IP mobility management protocols for consumer mobile devices. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics 56(2): 1010–1017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Baumann, F. V., & Niemegeers, I. G. (1994). An evaluation of location management procedures. In Proceedings of IEEE UPC1994 (pp. 359–364).

  38. Lee, J. H., Chung, T. M., & Gundavelli, S. (2008). A comparative signaling cost analysis of hierarchical mobile IPv6 and proxy mobile IPv6. In Proceeding of IEEE PIMRC2008 (pp. 1–6).

  39. Makaya C., Pierre S. (2008) An analytical framework for performance evaluation of IPv6-based mobility management protocols. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 7(3): 972–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianfeng Guan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guan, J., Zhou, H., Xu, C. et al. The Performance Analysis of the Multicast Extension Support for Proxy MIPv6. Wireless Pers Commun 61, 657–677 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-011-0425-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-011-0425-1

Keywords

Navigation