Abstract
The new generation network or the future Internet should treat mobile hosts as first-class objects and allow them to move freely across different networks that use heterogeneous protocols. For this purpose, this paper presents a mobility scheme, designed on the basis of the ID/locator split concept. The scheme provides mobility support from the identity layer, a shim layer inserted between the transport and network layers in the new generation network architecture. Mobility functions are independent of network layer protocols, thus they support mobility across heterogeneous network protocols. These functions are distributed in both end hosts and edge routers so that the scheme provides seamless mobility by reducing handover delay and consequent interruption in communication sessions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Saltzer, J. (1993). On the naming and binding of network destinations, RFC 1498.
AKARI. Architecture Design Project for New Generation Network, from http://akari-project.nict.go.jp.
Kafle V. P., Inoue M. (2010) HIMALIS: Heterogeneity inclusion and mobility adaptation through locator ID separation in new generation networks. IEICE Transactions on Communications E 93(B(3): 478–489
Kafle V. P., Otsuki H., Inoue M. (2010) An ID/locator split architecture for future networks. IEEE Communications Magazine 48(2): 138–144
Kafle V. P., Inoue M. (2010) Locator ID separation for mobility management in the new generation network. Journal of Wireless Mobile Networks, Ubiquitous Computing, and Dependable Applications 1(2/3): 3–15
Kafle, V. P., & Inoue, M. (2010). Mobility management in HIMALIS architecture. Proceedings of Workshop on Mobile IPv6 and Network-based Localized Mobility Management (MobiWorld’10). Las Vegas, USA.
Perkins, C. (2002). IP mobility support for IPv4, RFC 3344.
Johnson, D., Perkins, C., & Arkko, J. (2004). Mobility support in IPv6, RFC 3775.
Gundavelli, S. et al. (2008). Proxy mobile IPv6, RFC 5213.
Moskowitz, R., & Nikander, P. (2006). Host indentity protocol architecture, RFC 4423.
Moskowitz, R., Nikander, P., Jokela, P., & Henderson, T. (2008). Host identity protocol, RFC 5201.
Ishiyama M., Kunishi M., Uehara K., Esaki H., Teraoka F. (2001) LINA: A new approach to mobility support in wide area networks. IEICE Transactions on Communications E 84(B(8): 2076–2086
Farinacci, D., Fuller, V., Meyer, D., & Lewis, D. (2010). Locator/ID separation protocol (LISP), Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-lisp-07.
Farinacci, D., Fuller, V., Lewis, D., & Meyer, D. (2010). LISP mobile node, Internet-Draft, draft-meyer-lisp-mn-03.
Devarapalli, V. et al. (2005). Network mobility (NEMO) basic support protocol, RFC 3969.
Yan Z., Zhou H., You I. (2010) N-NEMO: A comprehensive network mobility solution in proxy mobile IPv6 network. Journal of Wireless Mobile Networks, Ubiquitous Computing, and Dependable Applications 1(2/3): 52–70
PlanetLab, from http://www.planet-lab.org/.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This paper was partially presented at the 2nd International Workshop on Mobile IPv6 and Network-based Localized Mobility Management (MobiWorld 2010), Las Vegas, USA, January 2010.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kafle, V.P., Inoue, M. ID/Locator Split-Based Mobility Scheme for Heterogeneous New Generation Network. Wireless Pers Commun 61, 753–764 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-011-0430-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-011-0430-4