Skip to main content
Log in

Cross-Layer Design of 2D Queuing Model for Multi-hop Wireless Networks

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on cross-layer design, a modified 2-dimensional queuing model (2DQM) is proposed in this paper to tackle the problem of end-to-end quality of service (QoS) metric calculation. This model exploits the traffic arrival process, multi-rate transmission in the physical layer and error recovery technology with the protocol of truncated automatic repeat request in the data link layer. Based on this model, QoS metrics of wireless links can be evaluated hop by hop. The model can be used in more realistic scenarios of multi-hop wireless networks, although the computational complexity of 2DQM is slightly higher compared with existing 1-dimensional queuing model. Simulation results indicate that the proposed model can estimate the end-to-end packet loss-rate and average delay more accurately than existing models, and a model based QoS routing algorithm can find routes with better QoS performance (with lower end-to-end packet loss-rate and delay).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rutagemwa, H., Willink, T. J., & Li, L. (2010). Modeling and performance analysis of multihop cooperative wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 59(6), 3057–3069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng, M., Ye, Q., & Cai, L. (2012). Cross-layer schemes for reducing delay in multihop wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications. doi:10.1109/TWC.2012.121412.120635.

  3. Gomez, G., Gonzalez, J. P., Aguayo-Torres, M. C., & Munoz, J. T. E. (2010). QoS modeling for end-to-end performance evaluation over networks with wireless access. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, doi:10.1155/2010/831707.

  4. Wang, Y., Vuran, M. C., & Goddard, S. (2012). Cross-layer analysis of the end-to-end delay distribution in wireless sensor networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 20(1), 305–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu, T., & Liao, W. (2009). Interference-aware QoS routing for multi-rate multi-radio multi-channel IEEE 802.11 wireless mesh networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 8(1), 166–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Namanya, A. P., & Pagna-Disso, J. (2013). Performance modelling and analysis of the delay aware routing metric in Cognitive Radio Ad Hoc networks. In Proceedings of 6th joint IFIP wireless and mobile networking conference (WMNC 2013). Dubai, United Arab Emirates. April 23–25, 2013.

  7. Arockiam, L., & Newton, P. C. (2012). Mathematical modeling and simulation study of delay-sensitive algorithm to enhance quality of service in mobile networks. International Journal of Future Generation Communication and Networking, 5(3), 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Le, L., & Hossain, E. (2008). Tandem queue models with applications to Qos routing in multihop wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 7(8), 1025–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ramis, J., & Femenias, G. (2013). Cross-layer QoS-constrained optimization of adaptive multi-rate wireless systems using infrastructure-based cooperative ARQ. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 12(5), 2424–2435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. McAuley, A., & Kant, L., Sinkar, K., et al. (2012). Understanding the delay and loss tradeoffs in large wireless military networks using queuing analysis and MAC models. In Proceedings of the IEEE Military Communications Conference (MILCOM 2012). Orlando, FL, United states. November 1–1, 2012.

  11. Liu, Q., Shengli Zhou, S., & Giannakis, G. B. (2005). Queuing with adaptive modulation and coding over wireless links: Cross-layer analysis and design. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 4(3), 1142–1153.

  12. Liu, Q., Shengli Zhou, S., & Giannakis, G. B. (2004). Cross-layer combining of adaptive modulation and coding with truncated ARQ over wireless links. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 3(5), 1746–1755.

  13. Guillem, F., Janume, R., & Loren, C. (2009). Using two-dimensional Markov models and the effective-capacity approach for cross-layer design in AMC/ARQ-based wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 58(8), 4192–4203.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zheng, K., Wang, Y., Lei, L., & Wang, W. (2010). Cross-layer queuing analysis on multihop relaying networks with adaptive modulation and coding. IET Communications, 4(3), 295–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ahmad, S. J., Reddy, V. S. K., Damodaram, A., et al. (2012). Efficient path estimation routing protocol for QoS in long distance MANETs. In International conference on intelligent systems design and applications (ISDA 2012) (pp. 178–183). Kochi, India. November 27–29, 2012.

  16. Alwan, H., & Agarwal, A. (2013). Multi-objective QoS routing for wireless sensor networks. In International conference on computing, networking and communications (ICNC 2013) (pp. 1074–1079). San Diego, CA, United States, January 28–31 2013.

  17. Uthra, R. A., & Raja, S. V. K. (2012). QoS routing in wireless sensor networks—A survey. ACM Computing Surveys. doi:10.1145/2379776.2379785.

  18. Wang, W., Liu, X., & Krishnaswamy, D. (2009). Robust routing and scheduling in wireless mesh networks under dynamic traffic conditions. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 8(6), 1705–1717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Feng, W., Liu, J., Cao, J., et al. (2013). Interference-aware cooperative QoS routing in multi-hop wireless networks. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 39(6), 1650–1666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Narayan, D. G., Nivedita, R., & Kiran, S., et al. (2012). Congestion adaptive multipath routing protocol for multi-radio Wireless Mesh Networks. In International conference on radar, communication and computing (ICRCC 2012) (pp. 72–76). Tiruvannamalai, Tamilnadu, India, December 21–22 2012.

  21. Xu, Y., Deng, J. D., & Nowostawski, M. (2013). Quality of service for video streaming over multi-hop wireless networks: Admission control approach based on analytical capacity estimation. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 8th international conference on intelligent sensors, sensor networks and information processing: Sensing the future (ISSNIP 2013) (pp. 345–350). Melbourne, VIC, Australia, April 2–5, 2013.

  22. Nishioka, J., & Yagyu, T. (2012). Availability constrained traffic control for AMC-enabled wireless mobile backhaul networks. In 2012 World Telecommunications Congress (WTC 2012). Miyazaki, Japan, March 5–6, 2012.

  23. Petreska, N. (2013). Towards new routing solutions for wireless industrial networks. In IEEE 14th international symposium on a world of wireless, mobile and multimedia networks (WoWMoM 2013). Madrid, Spain, June 4–7 2013.

  24. Baromand, S., Nekouie, M. A., & Navaie, K. (2012). A decentralized control strategy for joint resource allocation and routing in node-based wireless data networks. In International congress on ultra modern telecommunications and control systems and workshops (ICUMT 2012) (pp. 71–75). St. Petersburg, Russia, October 3–5, 2012.

  25. Li, B., & Kim, K. I. (2012). A novel routing protocol for (m, k)-firm-based real-time streams in wireless sensor networks. In IEEE wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC 2012) (pp. 1715–1719). Paris, France, April 1–4 2012.

  26. Little’s Theorem, http://cnx.org/content/m10747/latest/.

  27. Fall, K., & Varadhan, K. (2005). The NS manual (formerly NS Notes and Documentation). The VINT project, 47.

  28. Razavilar, J., Liu, K. J. R., & Marcus, S. I. (2002). Jointly optimized bit-rate/delay control policy for wireless packet networks with fading channels. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 50(3), 484–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yacoub, M. D., & Bautista, J. E. V. (1999). On higher order statistics of the Nakagami-m distribution. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 48(3), 790–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.61271233, No.60972038); Ministry of Education (China) Ph.D. Programs Foundation (No.20103223110001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuning Dong.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Derivation of the Average Number of Transmissions per Data Packet

Let the maximum number of retransmissions be \(N_r^{\max } \), then the average number of retransmissions per data packet can be expressed by the expectation of the number of transmissions, i.e. \(\bar{{N}}=E(N).\) So we have,

$$\begin{aligned} \bar{{N}}(p_0 ,N_r^{\max } )=(1-p_0 )+2p_0 (1-p_0 )+3p_0^2 (1-p_0 )+\cdots +(N_r^{\max } +1)p_0^{N_r^{\max }}\qquad \end{aligned}$$
(20)

or,

$$\begin{aligned} \bar{{N}}(p_0 ,N_r^{\max } )=1+p_0 +p_0^2 +\cdots +p_0^{N_r^{\max } } =\frac{1-p_0^{N_r^{\max } +1} }{1-p_0 } \end{aligned}$$
(21)

Appendix 2: Computation of Channel State Transition Probability

We derive the channel state transition probability \(P_{d|c}^{(k)} \) in Sect. 4. Suppose there are \(N+1\) states (i.e. State \(0, 1, {\ldots }, N\)) in the channel, and the state transition only happens between adjacent states, while the transition probability between non-adjacent states being zero (e.g. slow fading channel), i.e.

$$\begin{aligned} P_{m,n} =0,\quad |m-n|\ge 2 \end{aligned}$$

Then, the transition probability between adjacent states will be [28],

$$\begin{aligned} \left\{ {\begin{array}{l@{\quad }l} P_{n,n+1} =\frac{N_{n+1} T_f }{\Pr (n)},&{} \textit{if}~ n=0,\ldots ,N-1 \\ P_{n,n-1} =\frac{N_n T_f }{\Pr (n)},&{} \textit{if}~ n=1,\ldots ,N \\ \end{array}} \right. \end{aligned}$$
(22)

Where, \(N_{n}\) is the crossing rate of states under TM \(n\), which can be estimated by [29] (for Nakagami-m fading channels)

$$\begin{aligned} N_n =\sqrt{2\pi \frac{m\gamma _n }{\bar{{\gamma }}}}\frac{f_d }{\Gamma (m)}\left( \frac{m\gamma _n }{\bar{{\gamma }}}\right) ^{m-1}\exp \left( -\frac{m\gamma _n }{\bar{{\gamma }}}\right) \end{aligned}$$
(23)

Where, \(f_{d}\) is the Doppler frequency due to movement, \(\gamma _n \) the SINR threshold of TM \(n\), \(\bar{{\gamma }}\) the average SINR (\(\overline{\textit{SINR}} )\). Then the probability of channel staying at state \(n\) in the next time frame is

$$\begin{aligned} P_{n,n} =\left\{ {\begin{array}{l@{\quad }l} 1-P_{n,n+1} -P_{n,n-1} ,&{}\textit{if}~ 0<n<N \\ 1-P_{0,1} ,&{} \textit{if}~ n=0 \\ 1-P_{N,N-1} ,&{} \textit{if}~ n=N \\ \end{array}} \right. \end{aligned}$$
(24)

\(P_{d|c}^{(k)} \) can now be computed using a FSMC channel model represented by a \((N+1)\times (N+1) \) state transition matrix below,

$$\begin{aligned} P_c =\left[ {\begin{array}{c@{\quad }c@{\quad }c@{\quad }c} P_{0,0 }&{} P_{0,1}&{}\ldots &{} 0 \\ P_{1,0 }&{} P_{1,1}&{} P_{1,2}&{} \vdots \\ 0 &{}\ddots &{} \ddots &{} 0 \\ \vdots &{} P_{N-1,N-2}&{} P_{N-1,N-1} &{}P_{N-1,N} \\ 0&{} \ldots &{} P_{N,N-1} &{}P_{N,N} \\ \end{array}} \right] \end{aligned}$$
(25)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dong, Y., Du, P. Cross-Layer Design of 2D Queuing Model for Multi-hop Wireless Networks. Wireless Pers Commun 77, 1815–1832 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-014-1610-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-014-1610-9

Keywords

Navigation