Skip to main content
Log in

Reduced-Dimensional PARAFAC-Based Algorithm for Joint Angle and Doppler Frequency Estimation in Monostatic MIMO Radar

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, the problem of joint direction of arrival (DOA) and Doppler frequency estimation using parallel factor (PARAFAC) analysis in the monostatic multiple-input multiple-output radar is investigated and a reduced-dimensional PARAFAC (RD-PARAFAC) algorithm is proposed. In order to overcome the shortcoming of the heavy computational load in conventional PARAFAC algorithm, we firstly utilize a RD transformation by employing the property of uniform linear arrays, which can remove the redundant entries of steering matrix. By means of the reduced-dimensional transformation, the proposed algorithm can reduce the computational complexity, save memory capacity significantly and has very close joint DOA and Doppler frequency estimation performance when compared with conventional PARAFAC algorithm. Meanwhile, it outperforms the estimation of signal parameters via rotational invariance technique and the propagator method. Furthermore, our algorithm needs no spectral peak searching or pair matching. The complexity analysis and the Cramer-Rao Bound of the DOA and frequency estimation is derived. Simulations are provided to verify its effectiveness and superiority.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Li, J., Stoica, P., Xu, L., et al. (2007). On parameter identifiability of MIMO radar. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 14(12), 968–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Li, J., & Stoica, P. (2007). MIMO radar with colocated antennas. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 24(5), 106–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fishler, E., Haimovich, A., Blum, R. S., et al. (2006). Spatial diversity in radars models and detection performance. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 54(3), 823–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bekkerman, I., & Tabrikian, J. (2006). Target detection and localization using MIMO radars and sonars. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 54(10), 3873–3883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li, X., Zhang, Z., Mao, W. X. et al. (2010). A study of frequency diversity MIMO radar beamforming. In IEEE 10th international conference (ICSP2010), Beijing, China, pp. 352–356.

  6. Sharma, R. (2010). Analysis of MIMO radar ambiguity functions and implications on clear region. In IEEE international radar conference, Washington DC, USA, pp. 544–548.

  7. Li, J., Liao, G., & Griffiths, H. (2011). Bistatic MIMO radar space-time adaptive processing. In 2011 IEEE international radar conference, Westin Crown Center in Kansas City, Missouri, pp. 498–502.

  8. Yan, H., Li, J., & Liao, G. (2008). Multitarget identification and localization using bistatic MIMO radar systems. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2008, 1–8.

  9. Wilcox, D., Sellathurai, M., & Ratnarajah, T. (2007). A comparison of MIMO and phased array radar with the application of MUSIC. In Conference record of the forty-first asilomar conference on signals, systems and computers, pp. 1529–1533.

  10. Zhang, X., Xu, L., Xu, L., et al. (2010). Direction of departure (DOD) and direction of arrival (DOA) estimation in MIMO radar with reduced-dimensional MUSIC. IEEE Communication Letters, 14(12), 1161–1163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gao, X., Zhang, X., Feng, G., Wang, Z. et al. (2009). On the MUSIC-derived approaches of angle estimation for bistatic MIMO radar. In International conference on wireless networks and information systems, pp. 343–346.

  12. Chen, D., Chen, B., & Qian, G. (2008). Angle estimation using ESPRIT in MIMO radar. IEEE Electronics Letters, 44(12), 770–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen, J., Gu, H., & Su, W. (2008). Angle estimation using ESPRIT without pairing in MIMO radar. IEEE Electronics Letter, 44(24), 1422–1423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, X., et al. (2012). Reduced-complexity Capon for direction of arrival estimation in a monostatic multiple-input multiple-output radar. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 6(8), 796–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang, X., Wu, H., Li, J., et al. (2012). Computationally efficient DOD and DOA estimation for bistatic MIMO radar with propagator method. International Journal of Electronics, 99(9), 1207–1221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nion, D., & Sidiropoulos, N. D. (2009). A PARAFAC-based technique for detection and localization of multiple targets in a MIMO radar system. In IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing, pp. 2077–2080.

  17. Zhang, X., Xu, Z., Xu, L., et al. (2011). Trilinear decomposition-based transmit angle and receive angle estimation for multiple-input multiple-output radar. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 5(6), 626–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, X., Gao, X., Feng, G., et al. (2009). Blind joint DOA and DOD estimation and identifiability results for MIMO radar with different transmit/receive array manifolds. Progress in Electromagnetics Research B, 18, 101–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schmidt, R. O. (1986). Multiple emmitter location and signal parameter specetral estimation. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 34(3), 276–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Roy, R., & Kailath, T. (1989). ESPRIT-estimation of signal parameters via rotational in variance techniques. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 37(7), 984–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tayem, N., & Kwon, H. M. (2005). L-shape 2-dimensional arrival angle estimation with propagator method. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 53(5), 1622–1630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tayem, N., & Kwon, H. M. (2005). Angle estimation with propagator method for correlated sources under unknownsymmetric toeplitz noise. In Canadian conference on electrical and computer engineering, pp. 316–319.

  23. Lemma, N., van der Veen, A. J., & Deprettere, E. F. (2003). Analysis of joint angle-frequency estimation using ESPRIT. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 51(5), 1264–1283.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Cao, Y. (2010). Joint estimation of angle and Doppler frequency for bistatic MIMO radar. Electronics Letters, 46(2), 170–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang, X., & Zongze, X. (2010). Improved joint direction of arrival and frequency estimation using propagator method. In IEEE 2010 2nd international conference on information science and engineering (ICISE), pp. 2139–2142.

  26. Pham, T. D., & Mocks, J. (1992). Beyond principal component analysis: A trilinear decomposition model and least squares estimation. Psychometrika, 57(2), 203–215.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Wu, H., Yu, R., & Oguma, K. (2001). Trilinear component analysis in modern analytical chemistry. Analytical Sciences/Supplements, 17(4), 1483–1486.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wise, B. M., Gallagher, N. B., Butler, S. W., et al. (1999). A comparison of principal component analysis, multiway principal component analysis, trilinear decomposition and parallel factor analysis for fault detection in a semiconductor etch process. Journal of Chemometrics, 13, 379–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Henrion, R., & Andersson, C. A. (1999). A new criterion for simple-structure core transformations in N-way principal components analysis. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 47, 189–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nion, D., & Sidiropoulos, N. D. (2009). Adaptive algorithms to track the PARAFAC decomposition of a third-order tensor. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 57, 2299–2310.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Li, J., & Zhang, X. (2012). Joint estimation of angle and Doppler frequency in bistatic MIMO radar based on quadrilinear decomposition. Acta Aeronauticaet Astronautica Sinica, 33(8), 1474–1482.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kruskal, J. B. (1977). Three-way arrays: Rank and uniqueness of trilinear decompositions, with application to arithmetic complexity and statistics. Linear Algebra and its Applications, 18(2), 95–138.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Bro, R., Sidiropoulos, N. D., & Giannakis, G. B. (1999). A fast least squares algorithm for separating trilinear mixtures. In Proceedings of international workshop independent component analysis blind signal separation (ICA), pp. 289–294.

  34. Stoica, P., & Nehorai, A. (1990). Performance study of conditional and unconditional direction-of-arrival estimation. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 38(10), 1783–1795.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by China NSF Grants (61371169, 61301108, 61471191, 61471192, 61271327), Jiangsu Planned Projects for Postdoctoral Research Funds (1201039C), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2012M521099,2013M541661), Open project of Key Laboratory of modern acoustic of Ministry of Education (Nanjing University), the Aeronautical Science Foundation of China(20120152001), Qing Lan Project, priority academic program development of Jiangsu high education institutions and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (NS2013024, kfjj130114, kfjj130115).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renzheng Cao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cao, R., Zhang, X. & Wang, C. Reduced-Dimensional PARAFAC-Based Algorithm for Joint Angle and Doppler Frequency Estimation in Monostatic MIMO Radar. Wireless Pers Commun 80, 1231–1249 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-014-2084-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-014-2084-5

Keywords

Navigation