Skip to main content
Log in

Lessons from SmartCampus: External Experimenting with User-Centric Internet-of-Things Testbed

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Creating Internet-of-Things (IoT) solutions that can be deployed at scale requires adequate experimentation environments. In the area of experimentation, two trends can be observed. First, there is a shift from lab-based, controlled experiments to experimenting “in the wild”: researchers tend to augment the users’ natural environments and observe how people integrate a new solution into their everyday lives. Second, when a substantial investment in setting up an experimentation infrastructure has been made, it makes sense to open it to a wide community of researchers; the concept of Experimentation-as-a-Service (EaaS) is emerging along these lines. SmartCampus, an IoT testbed developed at the University of Surrey, fits the both trends very well. It involves real users in a natural setting, as IoT devices are deployed in the users’ offices. Further, several user-centric experiments conducted in the SmartCampus were driven by external researchers, i.e., people who do not belong to the team that developed the testbed. In this paper we report on lessons learned from such IoT experiments. After a brief overview of SmartCampus and the experiments themselves, we offer a simple experiment stakeholder model, which identifies key actors and interfaces between them. We then focus on issues related to the external experimenters who take advantage of the experimentation “service.” That focus is motivated by our realization that EaaS, while attractive in principle, gives rise to a number of non-trivial challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rogers, Y. (2011). Interaction design gone wild: Striving for wild theory. ACM Interactions, 18(4), 58–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Future Internet Research & Experimentation. http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/fire/

  3. Nati, M., Gluhak, A., Abangar, H., & Headley, W. (2013). SmartCampus: A user-centric testbed for Internet of Things experimentation. In Proceedings of the 16th international symposium on wireless personal multimedia communications, WPMC’13.

  4. Gluhak, A., Krco, S., Nati, M., Pfisterer, D., Mitton, N., & Razafindralambo, T. (2011). A survey on facilities for experimental internet of things research. IEEE Communications Magazine, 49(11), 58–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Werner-Allen, G., Swieskowski, P., & Welsh, M. (2005). Motelab: A wireless sensor network testbed. In Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on information processing in sensor networks, IPSN05.

  6. Handziski, V., Köpke, A., Willig, A., & Wolisz, A. (2006). Twist: A scalable and reconfigurable testbed for wireless indoor experiments with sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on multi-hop ad hoc networks: from theory to reality, REALMAN06 (pp. 63–70).

  7. Chatzigiannakis, I., Fischer, S., Koninis, C., Mylonas, G., & Pfisterer, D. (2010). Wisebed: An open large-scale wireless sensor network testbed. Sensor Applications, Experimentation, and Logistics, LCNS, 29, 68–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dawson-Haggerty, S., Ortiz, J., Jiang, X., Hsu, J., Shankar, S., Culler, D. (2010). Enabling green building applications. In Proceedings of the 6th workshop on hot topics in embedded networked sensor, HotEmnets’10.

  9. Karagiannis, M., Chantzis, K., Nikoletseas, S., & Rolim, J. (2011). Passive target tracking: Application with mobile devices using an indoors WSN future internet testbed. In Proceedings of international conference on distributed computing in sensor systems, DCOSS’11 (Vol. 6, pp. 27–29).

  10. The PlaceLab: A living laboratory. http://alumni.media.mit.edu/emunguia/html/placelab.htm

  11. De Ruyter, B., Van Loenen, E., & Teeven, V. (2007). User centered research in ExperienceLab. In Proceedings of the 2007 European conference on ambient intelligence (Am I’07), (pp. 305–313). Berlin: Springer.

  12. Memsic. http://www.memsic.com/wireless-sensor-networks/TPR2420

  13. REDUCE Project. http://info.ee.surrey.ac.uk/CCSR/REDUCE/

  14. Domaszewicz, J., & Lalis, S. (2013). Soft actuation for home and office. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on intelligent environments, Athens, Greece.

  15. SmartSatander Project. http://www.smartsantander.eu/

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the European Union under Contract Numbers ICT-2009-257992 (SmartSantander) and ICT-610477 (IoT Lab) and by the REDUCE project Grant EP/I000232/1 under the Digital Economy Programme run by Research Councils UK.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michele Nati.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nati, M., Gluhak, A., Domaszewicz, J. et al. Lessons from SmartCampus: External Experimenting with User-Centric Internet-of-Things Testbed. Wireless Pers Commun 93, 709–723 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-014-2223-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-014-2223-z

Keywords

Navigation