Skip to main content
Log in

Power Allocation in Cooperative Communication System Based on Stackelberg Game

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cooperative communication has great potential to improve the wireless channel capacity by exploiting the antennas on wireless devices for spatial diversity. The performance in cooperative communication depends on careful resource allocation such as relay selection and power control. In this paper, the network is expanded and more than one source is used. What is proposed is a distributed buyer/seller game theoretic framework over multiuser cooperative communication networks in order to stimulate cooperation and improve the system performance. A two-level Stackelberg game is employed to jointly consider the benefits of the source node and the relay nodes in which the source node is modeled as a buyer and the relay nodes are modeled as sellers, respectively. In this work we proposed coded method in which relays amplify and code Source data and send it to destination at the same time and then signal detection occur in destination, but in the codeless network relays send source data separately to destination. So, here coded and codeless networks are compared and contrasted. The stimulation results revealed that the proposed coded method performed better than the codeless ones; furthermore, the research shows that relays near the sources can play a significant role in increasing source node’s utility, so every source would like to buy more power from these preferred relays. Also, the proposed algorithm enforces truthful power demands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Proakis, J. G. (2001). Digital communication (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Su, W., Sadek, A. K., & Liu, K. J. R. (2009). Cooperative communications and networking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Laneman, J. N., Tse, D. N. C., & Wornell, G. W. (2004). Cooperative diversity in wireless networks: Efficient protocols and outage behavior. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 50, 3062–3080.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Laneman, J. (2002). Cooperative diversity in wireless networks: Algorithms and architectures. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.

  5. Himsoon, T., Pairat, W. P., Han, Z., & Liu, K. J. R. (2007). Lifetime maximization via cooperative nodes and relay deployment in wireless networks. IEEE Journal of Selected Area in, Communications, 25, 306–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Janzamin, M., Pakravan, M. and Sedghi, H. (2010). A game-theoretic approach for power allocation in bidirectional cooperative communication. In IEEE WCNC (pp. 1–6).

  7. Wang, H., Gao, L., Gan, X., Wang, X. and Hossain, E.(2010). Cooperative spectrum sharing in cognitive radio networks: a game-theoretic approach. In IEEE ICC (pp. 1–5).

  8. Fudenberg, D., & Tirole, J. (1993). Game theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Osborne, M. J., & Rubinstein, A. (1994). A course in game theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Luo, M., Xin, X. and Song,Y. P. (2011). Relay node selection and game theory based power allocation in the cooperative networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE mechanic automation and control engineering (pp. 7555–7558).

  11. Ng, C. Y., Lok, T. M., & Wong, T. F. (2010). Pricing games for distributed cooperative transmission. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 59, 3393–3406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ghasemi, A., Faez, K. and Dehghan, M. (2006). A new pricing function for power control game in wireless data networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE vehicular technology conference (pp. 1–5).

  13. Chen, L., Libman, L., & Leneutre, J. (2011). Conflicts and incentives in wireless cooperative relaying: A distributed market pricing framework. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 22, 758–772.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Ren, S., & van der Schaar, M. (2011). Pricing and distributed power control in wireless relay networks. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 59, 2913–2926.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, B., Han, Z., & Liu, K. J. R. (2009). Distributed relay selection and power control for multiuser cooperative communication networks using Stackelberg game. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 8, 975–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Shahzadi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mahdavi Lenji, A., Shahzadi, A. Power Allocation in Cooperative Communication System Based on Stackelberg Game. Wireless Pers Commun 84, 123–135 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-015-2597-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-015-2597-6

Keywords

Navigation