Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of Channel Estimation Error on the Performance of Relay Selection in Cognitive Radio Networks

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Channel estimation error, which adversely affects the performance of any wireless communication system, is inevitably available in receivers. However, its impact on the bit error rate (BER) performance of relay selection in underlay cognitive networks has not been investigated analytically. This paper fills in this literature gap by firstly proposing an exact single-integral form BER formula for general network topology. Based on this proposal, we further analyze the diversity gain to have insights into asymptotic performance and system design. Secondly, we derive a closed-form approximate BER formula, which has been shown highly accurate, for a typical network topology where relays are closely positioned for reduced simulation time. Various results demonstrate that the channel estimation error significantly degrades the performance of the relay selection in underlay cognitive networks and completely destroys its diversity gain. In addition, increasing the number of involved relays drastically remedies its impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The effect of channel estimation error on relay selection in underlay cognitive networks was studied for the AF relays in [16, 17]. The literature related to the AF relays should not be further surveyed since this paper concentrates the DF relays in underlay cognitive networks.

  2. It is worth emphasizing that multiple works investigate the impact of the channel estimation error on the BER performance of underlay cognitive networks (e.g., [2527]). Nevertheless, the issue of the relay selection which makes the theoretical analysis complicated has not been discussed in any work.

  3. \({h}\sim {{\mathcal {CN}}}\left( a,p \right) \) stands for a circular symmetric complex Gaussian random variable with mean a and variance p.

  4. The BER of other modulation schemes such as M-ary Phase Shift Keying (M-PSK) can be analyzed in the same manner.

  5. For notation simplicity without any confusion, we also denote \({\vartheta }_{X,L} = {\vartheta }_{3}\). Generally, \({{\vartheta }_{1}}\ne {{\vartheta }_{2}}\ne {{\vartheta }_{3}}\ne {{\vartheta }_{4}}\) and so, this case is considered in the current paper.

  6. The computer program shows that the high-SNR approximate BER matches with the single-integral form BER at very low values, which are not convenient to be displayed together with high BERs (i.e., the BERs for W = 1) on the same graph. Therefore, we limit to plot BERs up to \({{10}^{-10}}\).

References

  1. FCC. (2002) Spectrum policy task force report, ET Docket 02–135.

  2. Goldsmith, A., Jafar, S. A., Maric, I., & Srinivasa, S. (2009). Breaking spectrum gridlock with cognitive radios: An information theoretic perspective. Proceedings of the IEEE, 97(5), 894–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee, J., Wang, H., Andrews, J. G., & Hong, D. (2011). Outage probability of cognitive relay networks with interference constraints. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communication, 10(2), 390–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hong, J. P., Hong, B., Ban, T. W., & Choi, W. (2012). On the cooperative diversity gain in underlay cognitive radio systems. IEEE Transactions on Communication, 60(1), 209–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yan, Z., Zhang, X., & Wang, W. (2011). Exact outage performance of cognitive relay networks with maximum transmit power limits. IEEE Communication Letters, 15(12), 1317–1319.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang, X., Yan, Z., Gao, Y., & Wang, W. (2013). On the study of outage performance for cognitive relay networks (CRN) with the Nth best-relay selection in Rayleigh-fading channels. IEEE Wireless Communication Letters, 2(1), 110–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Guimaraes, F. R. V., da Costa, D. B., Tsiftsis, T. A., Cavalcante, C. C., & Karagiannidis, G. K. (2014). Multi-user and multi-relay cognitive radio networks under spectrum sharing constraints. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 63(1), 433–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liping, L., Zhang, P., Zhang, G., & Qin, J. (2011). Outage performance for cognitive relay networks with underlay spectrum sharing. IEEE Communication Letters, 15(7), 710–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Si, J., Li, Z., Huang, H., Chen, J., & Gao, R. (2012). Capacity analysis of cognitive relay networks with the PU’s interference. IEEE Communication Letters, 16(12), 2020–2023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bao, V. N. Q., & Duong, T. Q. (2012). Exact outage probability of cognitive underlay DF relay networks with best relay selection. IEICE Transactions on Communications, E95–B(6), 2169–2173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tourki, K., Qaraqe, K. A., & Alouini, M. S. (2013). Outage analysis for underlay cognitive networks using incremental regenerative relaying. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 62(2), 721–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Si, J., Li, Z., Chen, X., Hao, B. J., & Liu, Z. J. (2011). On the performance of cognitive relay networks under primary user’s outage constraint. IEEE Communication Letters, 15(4), 422–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Laneman, J. N., Tse, D. N. C., & Wornell, G. W. (2004). Cooperative diversity in wireless networks: Efficient protocols and outage behavior. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 50(12), 3062–3080.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Nosratinia, A., Hunter, T. E., & Hedayat, A. (2004). Cooperative communication in wireless networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 42(10), 74–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bletsas, A., Khisti, A., Reed, D. P., & Lippman, A. (2006). Simple cooperative diversity method based on network path selection. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 24(3), 659–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen, J., Si, J., Li, Z., & Huang, H. (2012). On the performance of spectrum sharing cognitive relay networks with imperfect CSI. IEEE Communication Letters, 16, 1002–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhong, B., Zhang, Z., Zhang, X., Wang, J., & Long, K. (2013). Partial relay selection with fixed-gain relays and outdated CSI in underlay cognitive networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 62(9), 4696–4701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ding, H., Ge, J., da Costa, D. B., & Jiang, Z. (2011). Asymptotic analysis of cooperative diversity systems with relay selection in a spectrum-sharing scenario. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 60, 457–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Prasad, B., Roy, S. D. & Kundu, S. (2014). Outage performance of cognitive relay network with imperfect channel estimation under proactive DF relaying. In Proceedings of IEEE NCC (pp. 1–6). Kanpur, India.

  20. Zhang, X., Xing, J., Yan, Z., Gao, Y., & Wang, W. (2013). Outage performance study of cognitive relay networks with imperfect channel knowledge. IEEE Communication Letters, 17(1), 27–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Giang, N. H., Bao, V. N. Q. & Le, H. N. (2013). Cognitive underlay communications with imperfect CSI: Network design and performance analysis. In Proceedings of IEEE ATC (pp. 18–22). HoChiMinh City, Vietnam.

  22. Thanh, T. L., Bao, V. N. Q. & An B. (2013). On the performance of outage probability in underlay cognitive radio with imperfect CSI. In Proceedings of IEEE ATC (pp. 125–130). HoChiMinh City, Vietnam.

  23. Wu, Q., Zhang, Z., & Wang, J. (2013). Outage analysis of cognitive relay networks with relay selection under imperfect CSI environment. IEEE Communication Letters, 17(7), 1297–1300.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Mokari, N., Parsaeefard, S., Saeedi, H., & Azmi, P. (2014). Cooperative secure resource allocation in cognitive radio networks with guaranteed secrecy rate for primary users. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 13(2), 1058–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Suraweera, H. A., Smith, P. J., & Shafi, M. (2010). Capacity limits and performance analysis of cognitive radio with imperfect channel knowledge. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 59, 1811–1822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bao, V. N. Q., Duong, T. Q., & Chintha, T. (2013). On the performance of cognitive underlay multihop networks with imperfect channel state information. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 61(12), 4864–4873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Khuong, H. V., & Sofotasios, P. C. (2013). Exact bit-error-rate analysis of underlay decode-and-forward multi-hop cognitive networks with estimation errors. IET Communications, 7(18), 2122–2132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ahmed, N., Khojastepour, M., & Aazhang, B. (2004). Outage minimization and optimal power control for the fading relay channel. In Proceedings of IEEE Information Theory Workshop (pp. 458–462). San Antonio, TX, USA.

  29. Amin, O., Ikki, S. S., & Uysal, M. (2011). On the performance analysis of multirelay cooperative diversity systems with channel estimation errors. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 60(5), 2050–2059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cho, K., & Yoon, D. (2002). On the general BER expression of one- and two-dimensional amplitude modulations. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 50(7), 1074–1080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Simon, M. K., & Alouini, M.-S. (2005). Digital communication over fading channels (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Duong, T. Q., da Costa, D. B., Elkashlan, M., & Bao, V. N. Q. (2012). Cognitive amplify-and-forward relay networks over Nakagami-m fading. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 61(5), 2368–2374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Li, D. (2014). Cognitive relay networks: Opportunistic or uncoded decode-and-forward relaying? IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 63(3), 1486–1491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gopalakrishna, A. & Ha, D. B. (2013). Capacity analysis of cognitive radio relay networks with interference power constraints in fading channels. In Proceedings of IEEE international conference on computing, management and telecommunications (pp. 111–116). HoChiMinh City, Vietnam.

  35. Hussain, S. I., Abdallah, M. M., Alouini, M.-S., Hasna, M., Qaraqe K. (2012). Best relay selection using SNR and interference quotient for underlay cognitive networks. In Proceedings of IEEE international conference on communications (pp. 4176–4180). Ottawa, Canada.

  36. Kim, J. B., & Kim, D. (2012). Outage probability and achievable diversity order of opportunistic relaying in cognitive secondary radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 60(9), 2456–2466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Akyildiz, I. F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., & Cayirci, E. (2002). A survey on sensor networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 40(8), 102–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gradshteyn, I. S., & Ryzhik, I. M. (2000). Table of integrals, series and products (6th ed.). New York: Academic.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Chiani, M., Dardari, D., & Simon, M. K. (2003). New exponential bounds and approximations for the computation of error probability in fading channels. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2(4), 840–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is funded by Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) under grant number 102.04-2014.42.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khuong Ho-Van.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ho-Van, K., Doan-Nguyen, K. & Ho-Ngoc, H. Impact of Channel Estimation Error on the Performance of Relay Selection in Cognitive Radio Networks. Wireless Pers Commun 84, 2513–2536 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-015-2717-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-015-2717-3

Keywords

Navigation