Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental Evaluation of Vibration Response Based Bridge Damage Detection Using Wireless Sensor Networks

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increasing use of wireless sensor networks (WSNs) provide opportunity for developing low cost smart systems for structural health monitoring such as bridges. Using WSN, a large number of sensors can be deployed for damage detection. In literature we find many simulation studies to study the parameters for bridge monitoring and damage detection. There are very few works that are deployed in real world scenarios. In this paper a set of commercially available Mica2 motes equipped with accelerometer are deployed on two bridge models in the laboratory to collect the vibration response from the bridge models. The vibration response data collected on intact model is compared with the damaged model. The thresholds are established using the histogram approach on the collected vibration data for intact bridge model. The results show the proper characterization of damage detection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yan, A.-M., Kerschen, Gaëtan, De Boe, Pascal, & Golinval, J.-C. (2005). Structural damage diagnosis under varying environmental conditionspart i: A linear analysis. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 19(4), 847–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yan, A.-M., Kerschen, Gaëtan, De Boe, P., & Golinval, J.-C. (2005). Structural damage diagnosis under varying environmental conditionspart ii: Local pca for non-linear cases. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 19(4), 865–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aygün, Bengi, & Gungor, Vehbi Cagri. (2011). Wireless sensor networks for structure health monitoring: Recent advances and future research directions. Sensor Review, 31(3), 261–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yick, Jennifer, Mukherjee, Biswanath, & Ghosal, Dipak. (2008). Wireless sensor network survey. Computer Networks, 52(12), 2292–2330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chintalapudi, K., Paek, J., Gnawali, O., Fu, T. S., Dantu, K., Caffrey, J., Govindan, R., Johnson, E., & Masri, S. (2006). Structural damage detection and localization using netshm. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Information processing in sensor networks (pp. 475–482). ACM.

  6. Rice, J. A., Mechitov, K. A., Spencer, B. F., Jr., & Agha, G. A. (2010). Autonomous smart sensor network for full-scale structural health monitoring. In SPIE smart structures and materials+ nondestructive evaluation and health monitoring (pp. 764726–764726). International Society for Optics and Photonics.

  7. Bocca, M., Cosar, E. I., Salminen, J., & Eriksson, L. M. (2009). A reconfigurable wireless sensor network for structural health monitoring. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on structural health monitoring of intelligent infrastructure (pp. 22–24).

  8. Bischoff, R., Meyer, J., Enochsson, O., Feltrin, G., & Elfgren, L. (2009). Event-based strain monitoring on a railway bridge with a wireless sensor network. In 4th international conference on structural health monitoring of intelligent infrastructure, SHMII-4.

  9. Jang, Shinae, Jo, Hongki, Cho, Soojin, Mechitov, Kirill, Rice, Jennifer A., Sim, Sung-Han, et al. (2010). Structural health monitoring of a cable-stayed bridge using smart sensor technology: Deployment and evaluation. Smart Structures and Systems, 6(5–6), 439–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nagayama, Tomonori, Moinzadeh, Parya, Mechitov, Kirill, Ushita, Mitsushi, Makihata, Noritoshi, Leiri, Masataka, et al. (2010). Reliable multi-hop communication for structural health monitoring. Smart Structures and Systems, 6(5–6), 481–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hackmann, G., Guo, W., Yan, G., Lu, C., & Dyke, S. (2010). Cyber-physical codesign of distributed structural health monitoring with wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM/IEEE international conference on cyber-physical systems (pp. 119–128). ACM.

  12. MTS310 Sensor Module, Memsic, Inc. http://www.memsic.com/wireless-sensor-networks/MTS310, April 2014.

  13. Gay, David, Levis, Philip, Von Behren, Robert, Welsh, Matt, Brewer, Eric, & Culler, David. (2003). The nesc language: A holistic approach to networked embedded systems. Acm Sigplan Notices, 38(5), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is partially supported by Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro, Pakistan and the Transportation and Crowd Management Center of Research Excellence (TCMCORE) at Umm Al-Qura University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. We also thank the Science and Technology Unit at Umm Al-Qura University for their continued logistic support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bhawani Shanker Chowdhry.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chowdhry, B.S., Shaikh, F.K., Ali, S. et al. Experimental Evaluation of Vibration Response Based Bridge Damage Detection Using Wireless Sensor Networks. Wireless Pers Commun 85, 499–510 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-015-2751-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-015-2751-1

Keywords

Navigation