Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Coverage Aware Scheduling in Wireless Sensor Networks: An Optimal Placement Approach

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Area coverage is an important issue in wireless sensor networks, which reflects how well an area is monitored or tracked by sensors. But, since a sensor network has restricted energy resources, energy efficiency is vital for this area coverage. One of the most efficient solutions to provide energy-aware area coverage is scheduling. That is, without any assumption about sensors’ locations, only a distributed and parallel scheduling method determines which sensors should be on and which ones should be off in each decision period. The ultimate objective is to maximize network lifetime and keeping a target level of area coverage. A major part of the algorithms proposed in this field, schedule a sensor node activity based on its neighbors’ information. Such information includes the distances of a node from its neighbors, the number of its active neighbors, etc. Indeed, message exchange is essential in the implementation of these algorithms which causes to increased energy consumption. In this paper, we propose a distributed scheduling algorithm, at which, each node itself decides to make its sensor on or off based on its location information and the node density over the target area. For this purpose, we first compute the minimum number of nodes that are enough to cover the target area. Then we obtain the best locations for theses nodes. Based on these computed location the area is partitioned into some sub-area, each one coverable by only one sensor. Then in each sub-area, a local scheduling procedure schedules the activation order of sensor. Simulation results show that the proposed algorithm, called CAOP, can maximize the network lifetime while maintaining complete area coverage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rault, T., Bouabdallah, A., & Challa, Y. (2014). Energy efficiency in wireless sensor networks: A top-down survey. Computer Networks, 67, 104–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rizvi, S., Qureshi, H. K., Ali Khayam, S., Rakocevic, V., & Rajarajan, M. (2012). An energy efficient topology control algorithm for connected area coverage in wireless sensor networks. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 35(2), 597–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang, Z. L., Li, D., Huang, T. P., & Cui, L. (2013). Leveraging data fusion to improve barrier coverage in wireless sensor networks. The Journal of China Universities of Posts and Telecommunications (Elsevier), 20(1), 26–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang, S., Dai, F., Cardei, M., Wu, J., & Patterson, F. (2006). On connected multiple point coverage in wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Wireless Information Networks, 13, 289–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Abdesslem, F. B., Phillips, A., & Henderson T. (2009). Energy efficient mobile sensing with SenseLess. In The 1st ACM Workshop on Networking, Systems, and Applications for Mobile Handhelds, Barcelona, Spain (pp. 61–62).

  6. Wu, T. T., & Ssu, K. F. (2005). Determining active sensor nodes for complete coverage without location information. International Journal of Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing, 1, 38–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, G., Cao, G., Berman, P., & Porta, T. F. L. (2007). Bidding protocols for deploying mobile sensors. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 6(5), 515–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, C., Chuang, C. L., Lin, T. S., Lee, C., & Jiang, J. A. (2010). A coverage-guaranteed algorithm to improve network lifetime of wireless sensor networks. Eurosensor XXIV Conference (Elsevier), 5, 192–195.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ye, F., Zhong, G., Cheng, J., Lu, S., & Zhang, L. (2003). PEAS: A robust energy conserving protocol for long-lived sensor networks. In The 23rd international conference on distributed computing systems (ICDCS), USA (pp. 28–37).

  10. Keskin, M. E., Altınel, I. K., Aras, N., & Ersoy, C. (2014). Wireless sensor network lifetime maximization by optimal sensor deployment, activity scheduling, data routing and sink mobility. Ad Hoc Networks (Elsevier), 17, 18–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Alonso, J. M., Voigt, T., & Varshney, A. (2013). Bounds on the lifetime of WSNs. In IEEE 9th international conference on distributed computing in sensor systems (DCoSS 2013) (pp. 367–373).

  12. Noori, M., & Ardakani, M. (2011). Lifetime analysis of random event-driven clustered wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 10(10), 1448–1458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bai, H., Chen, X., Li, B., & Han, D. (2007). A location-free algorithm of energy-efficient connected coverage for high density wireless sensor networks. Discrete Event Dynamic Systems (Springer), 17(1), 1–21.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, L. J., & Wang, H. C. (2011). Energy saving with node sleep and power control mechanisms for wireless sensor networks. The Journal of China Universities of Posts and Telecommunications (Elsevier), 18, 49–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pan, L., & Li, J. (2010). K-nearest neighbor based missing data estimation algorithm in wireless sensor networks. Wireless Sensor Network, 2(2), 115–122.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, C. F., & Lee, C. C. (2010). The optimization of sensor relocation in wireless mobile sensor networks. Computer Communications (Elsevier), 33, 828–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ölveczky, P. C., & Thorvaldsen, S. (2007). Formal modeling and analysis of the OGDC wireless sensor network algorithm in real-time Maude (FMOODS). In The 9th IFIP WG 6.1 international conference on Formal methods for open object-based distributed systems (Springer) (pp. 122–140).

  18. Banimelhem, O., Mowafi, M., & Aljoby, W. (2013). Genetic algorithm based node deployment in hybrid wireless sensor networks. Communications and Network, 5(4), 273–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, X., & Wang, S. (2011). Hierarchical deployment optimization for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 10(7), 1028–1041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Network simulator. www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns

  21. Mahjria, I., Dhraiefa, A., Mabroukia, I., Belghitha, A., & Drirab, K. (2014). The coverage configuration protocol under at-dist localization. In The 5th international conference on ambient systems, networks and technologies (ANT-2014), Procedia Computer Science (Vol. 32, pp. 141–148).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shahram Jamali.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jamali, S., Hatami, M. Coverage Aware Scheduling in Wireless Sensor Networks: An Optimal Placement Approach. Wireless Pers Commun 85, 1689–1699 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-015-2862-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-015-2862-8

Keywords

Navigation