Skip to main content
Log in

Threshold Based Censoring of Cognitive Radios in Rician Fading Channel

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes about the performance analysis and comparison between hard decision (majority rule) logic and soft decision (maximal ratio combining) logic approaches using cooperative spectrum sensing (CSS) with censoring scheme. We have considered both sensing channel (S-channel) and reporting channel (R-channel) are affected by Rician fading. Radio links present in the channel gets heavily faded and the information received at the fusion center (FC) becomes erroneous because of fading effect present in the channel. Threshold based censoring scheme is used to eliminate the heavily faded cognitive radios (CRs) in R-channel. Two fusion rules namely, majority logic and maximal ratio combining (MRC) are considered individually at the fusion center to estimate the performance of CSS by censoring of R-channel links. The performance is evaluated in terms of missed detection probability (\(Q_{m}\)) and total error probability (\(Q_{m} + Q_{f}\)) in both majority logic and MRC logic. Comparison table between perfect and imperfect channels is provided to know which fusion rule (MRC, majority) performs better under Rician fading. Simulations are performed under both perfect and imperfect channels by varying the network parameters like probability of false alarm (\(P_{f}\)), S-channel SNR, R-channel SNR, Rician fading parameter (K) and number of CR users (N).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akyildiz, I. F., et al. (2011). Emerging cognitive radio applications: A survey. IEEE Communication Magazines, 49(3), 74–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Federal Communication Commission. (2002). Spectrum policy task force. Rep. ET Docket no. 02-135.

  3. Haykin, S. (2005). Cognitive radio: Brain-empowered wireless communications. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 23(2), 201–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ghasemi, A., & Sousa, E. S. (2007). Opportunistic spectrum access in fading channels through collaborative sensing. Journal of Communications, 2(2), 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee, W.-Y., Chowdhury, K. R., & Vuran, M. C. (2009). Spectrum sensing algorithms for cognitive radio networks. In Y. Xiao & F. Hu (Eds.), Cognitive radio networks. Taylor & Francis Group.

  6. Cabric, D., Tkachenko, A., & Brodersen, R. W. (2006). Experimental study of spectrum sensing based on energy detection and network cooperation. In International Workshop on Technology and Policy for Accessing Spectrum, August 2006.

  7. Marcum, J. (1960). A statistical theory of target detection by pulsed radar. IRE Transactions on Information Theory, 6(2), 59–267.

  8. Digham, F. F., Alouini, M.-S., & Simon, M. K. (2003). On the energy detection of unknown signals over fading channels. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC’03) (pp. 3575–3579).

  9. Urkowitz, H. (1967). Energy detection of unknown deterministic signals. Proceedings of IEEE, 55(4), 523–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Akyildiz, I. F., Lo, B. F., & Balakrishnan, R. (2011). Cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks: A survey. Physical Communication Journal, 4(1), 40–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cabric, D., Mishra, S., & Brodersen, R. (2004). Implementation issues in spectrum sensing for cognitive radios. In Proceedings of Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers (Vol. 1, pp. 772–776).

  12. Duan, J., & Li, Y. (2010). Performance analysis of cooperative spectrum sensing in different fading channels. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Engineering and Technology (ICCET) (pp. 64–68).

  13. Niu, R., Chen, B., & Varshney, P. K. (2003). Decision fusion rules in wireless sensor networks using fading statistics. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS’03).

  14. Pandharipande, A., & Linnartz, J. P. M. G. (2007). Performance analysis of primary user detection in a multiple antenna cognitive radio. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC’07) (pp. 6482–6486).

  15. Ghasemi, A., & Sousa, E. S. (2005). Collaborative spectrum sensing for opportunistic access in fading environments. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DySPAN) (pp. 131–136). Baltimore.

  16. Ma, J., Zhao, G., & Li, Y. (2008). Soft combination and detection for cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communication, 7(11), 4502–4507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sun, C., Zhang, W., & Letaief, K. B. (2007). Cooperative spectrum sensing for cognitive radios under bandwidth constraints. In IEEE Wireless Communication and Networking Conference (WCNC 2007) (pp. 1–5).

  18. Nallagonda, S., Roy, S. D., Kundu, S., Ferrari, G., & Raheli, R. (2013). Cooperative spectrum sensing with censoring of cognitive radios in Rayleigh fading under majority logic fusion. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Communications (pp. 1–5). IIT Delhi.

  19. Nallagonda, S., Roy, S. D., Kundu, S., Ferrari, G., & Raheli, R. (2013). Performance of MRC fusion based cooperative spectrum sensing with censoring of cognitive radios in Rayleigh fading channel. In Proceedings of the Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (pp. 30–35). Sardinia, Italy: Academic Press.

  20. Lunden, J., Koivunen, V., Huttunen, A., & Poor, H. V. (2007). Censoring for collaborative spectrum sensing in cognitive radios. In Proceedings of the 41st Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers, Pacific Grove (pp. 772–776). CA, USA.

  21. Liang, Y. C., Zeng, Y., Peh, E. C. Y., & Hoang, A. T. (2008). Sensing-throughput trade-off for cognitive radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 7(3), 1326–1337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nuttall, A. H. (1975). Some integrals involving the QM function. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 21(1), 95–96.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Gradshteyn, I. S., & Ryzhik, I. M. (1994). Table of integrals, series, and products (5th ed.). London: Academic Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Simon, M. K., & Alouini, M. S. (2004). Digital communication over fading channels (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Ferrari, G., & Pagliari, R. (2006). Decentralized detection in sensor networks with noisy communication links. In F. Devoli, S. Pelezzo & S. Zappetore (Eds.), Distibuted cooperative laboratories: Networking, instrumentation, and measurements (pp. 233–249). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Ahmadi, H. R., &Vosoughi, A. (2008). Impact of channel estimation error on decentralized detection in bandwidth constrained wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of IEEE MILCOM 2008 (pp. 1–7). San Diego, USA.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Ranjeeth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ranjeeth, M., Anuradha, S. Threshold Based Censoring of Cognitive Radios in Rician Fading Channel. Wireless Pers Commun 93, 409–430 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-016-3440-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-016-3440-4

Keywords

Navigation