Skip to main content
Log in

Research on Coverage Probability in Ultra-Dense 5G Heterogeneous Cellular Networks Based on Poisson Clustered Process

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The cellular networks in 5G are tending to be heterogeneous and ultra-dense networks. The methods used in traditional hexagonal grid model are no more adaptive to the 5G heterogeneous cellular networks today, which are too idealized and inaccurate. A popular approach for analyzing heterogeneous cellular networks is using Poisson point process (PPP), which assumes that the deployment of base stations (BSs) is completely space random (CSR) and from which we can get a lower bound of the probability of coverage probability. However, geographical and human factors should be taken into account in reality. The BSs or mobile users may be clustered in crowded areas such as enterprises and shopping malls so that the space distribution based on PPP will be inaccurate. This motivates us to find a new approach to settle it. In this paper, we focus on using Poisson clustered process (PCP) to model ultra-dense 5G heterogeneous cellular networks which include macrocells, picocells and femtocells. First of all, a model of the locations of BSs based on Poisson clustered process (PCP) has been proposed, and the formation of clusters of the BSs has been discussed. Then the probability model of coverage and its three special cases using SINR have been derived, and the proposed model obeys to the cell selection mechanism based on instantaneous SINR. Finally, according to the proposed model, comparison and analysis of coverage probability using hexagonal grid model, PCP and PPP are done respectively. The numerical results show that using PCP can get higher coverage probability than using PPP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cisco. (2015). Cisco visual networking index: Forecast and methodology, 2014–2019 white paper.

  2. Ericsson (2011). More than 50 billion connected devices, ericsson white paper.

  3. You, X. H., Pan, Z. H. W., Gao, X. Q., Cao, S. M., & Wu, H. Q. (2014). The 5G mobile communication: the development trends and its emerging key techniques. Science China Information Sciences, 44(5), 551–563. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Liu, J., Nishiyama, H., Kato, N., & Guo, J. (2016). On the outage probability of device-to-device-communication-enabled multichannel cellular networks: an rss-threshold-based perspective. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 34(1), 163–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Björnson, E., Larsson, E. G., & Debbah, M. (2016). Massive MIMO for maximal spectral efficiency: How many users and pilots should be allocated? IEEE Transaction on Wireless Communications, 15(2), 1293–1308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Haenggi, M. (2012). Stochastic geometry for wireless networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Haenggi, M., Andrews, J. G., Baccelli, F., et al. (2009). Stochastic geometry and random graphs for the analysis and design of wireless networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 27(7), 1029–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cardieri, P. (2010). Modeling interference in wireless ad hoc networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 12(4), 551–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Elsawy, H., Hossain, E., & Haenggi, M. (2013). Stochastic geometry for modeling, analysis, and design of multi-tier and cognitive cellular wireless networks: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 15(3), 996–1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wyner, A. D. (1994). Shannon-theoretic approach to a Gaussian cellular multiple-access channel. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 40(6), 1713–1727.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Shamai, S., & Wyner, A. D. (1997). Information-theoretic considerations for symmetric, cellular, multiple-access fading channels—parts I & II. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 43(11), 1877–1911.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Somekh, O., & Shamai, S. (2000). Shannon-theoretic approach to a Gaussian cellular multi-access channel with fading. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 46(4), 1401–1425.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Mhatre, V. P., & Rosenberg, C. P. (2006). Impact of network load on forward link inter-cell interference in cellular data networks. IEEE Transaction on Wireless Communication, 5(12), 3651–3661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Charoen, P. & Ohtsuki, T. (2011). Codebook based interference mitigation with base station cooperation in multi-cell cellular network. In Proceeding of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall), San Francisco, CA (pp. 1–5).

  15. Nocetti, F. G., Stojmenovic, I., & Zhang, J. Y. (2002). Addressing and routing in hexagonal networks with applications for tracking mobile users and connection rerouting in cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 13(9), 963–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Guo, P., Wang, J., Li, B., & Lee, S. (2014). A variable threshold-value authentication architecture for wireless mesh networks. Journal of Internet Technology, 15(6), 929–936.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Xie, S., & Wang, Y. (2014). Construction of tree network with limited delivery latency in homogeneous wireless sensor networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 78(1), 231–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Andrews, J. G., Baccelli, F., & Ganti, R. K. (2011). A tractable approach to coverage and rate in cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 59(11), 3122–3124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dhillon, H. S., Ganti, R. K., Baccelli, F., & Andrews, J. G. (2012). Modeling and analysis of K-tier downlink heterogeneous cellular networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 30(3), 550–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vu T. T., Decreusefond, L. & Martins, P. (2012). An analytical model for evaluating outage and handover probability of cellular wireless networks. In Proceeding of 2012 International Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications (WPMC), Taipei (pp. 643–647).

  21. Busson, A., Chelius, G., & Gorce, J. M. (2009). Interference modeling in CSMA multi-hop wireless networks (pp. 237–242). Rennes, France: HAL-INRIA.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Busson, A. & Chelius, G. (2009). Point processes for interference modeling in CSMA/CA ad hoc networks. In ACM International Workshop on PERFORMANCE Evaluation of Wireless Ad Hoc, Sensor, and Ubiquitous Networks, Pe-Wasun 2009, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain, (pp. 33–40).

  23. Haenggi, M. (2011). Mean interference in hard-core wireless networks. IEEE Communications Letters, 15(8), 792–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Na, Deng, Zhou, W., & Haenggi, M. (2015). The ginibre point process as a model for wireless networks with repulsion. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 14(1), 107–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee, C. H., & Haenggi, M. (2012). Interference and outage in poisson cognitive networks. IEEE Transaction on Wireless Communication, 11(4), 1392–1401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ganti, R. K., & Haenggi, M. (2007). Interference and outage in clustered wireless ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 55(9), 4067–4086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chun, Y. J. & Hasna, M. O. (2014). Analysis of heterogeneous cellular networks interference with biased cell association using Poisson cluster processes. In International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence, Busan (pp. 319–324).

  28. Chiu, S. N., Stoyan, D., Kendall, W., & Mecke, J. (2013). Stochastic geometry and its applications (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Peng, J., Hong, P., & Xue, K. (2015). Energy-aware cellular deployment strategy under coverage performance constraints. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 14(1), 69–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Haenggi, M., & Ganti, R. K. (2009). Interference in large wireless networks. Foundations and Trends ® in Networking, 3(2), 127–248.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Stoyan, D., Kendall, W. S., & Mecke, J. (1995). Stochastic geometry and its applications (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61572074), A Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center on Atmospheric Environment and Equipment Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhong-gui Ma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Ly., Ma, Zg., Xue, Y. et al. Research on Coverage Probability in Ultra-Dense 5G Heterogeneous Cellular Networks Based on Poisson Clustered Process. Wireless Pers Commun 95, 2915–2930 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-3970-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-3970-4

Keywords

Navigation